如果我在Swift中有一个数组，并尝试访问一个越界的索引，有一个不足为奇的运行时错误:
var str = ["Apple", "Banana", "Coconut"]
str[0] // "Apple"
str[3] // EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION
然而，我本以为有了Swift带来的所有可选的链接和安全性，做这样的事情是微不足道的:
let theIndex = 3
if let nonexistent = str[theIndex] { // Bounds check + Lookup
print(nonexistent)
...do other things with nonexistent...
}
而不是:
let theIndex = 3
if (theIndex < str.count) { // Bounds check
let nonexistent = str[theIndex] // Lookup
print(nonexistent)
...do other things with nonexistent...
}
但事实并非如此——我必须使用ol' if语句来检查并确保索引小于str.count。
我尝试添加我自己的下标()实现，但我不确定如何将调用传递给原始实现，或者访问项目(基于索引)而不使用下标符号:
extension Array {
subscript(var index: Int) -> AnyObject? {
if index >= self.count {
NSLog("Womp!")
return nil
}
return ... // What?
}
}
适用于Swift 2
尽管这个问题已经被回答过很多次了，但我想给出一个更符合Swift编程时尚走向的答案，用Crusty的话来说就是:“先考虑协议”。
• What do we want to do?
- Get an Element of an Array given an Index only when it's safe, and nil otherwise
• What should this functionality base it's implementation on?
- Array subscripting
• Where does it get this feature from?
- Its definition of struct Array in the Swift module has it
• Nothing more generic/abstract?
- It adopts protocol CollectionType which ensures it as well
• Nothing more generic/abstract?
- It adopts protocol Indexable as well...
• Yup, sounds like the best we can do. Can we then extend it to have this feature we want?
- But we have very limited types (no Int) and properties (no count) to work with now!
• It will be enough. Swift's stdlib is done pretty well ;)
extension Indexable {
public subscript(safe safeIndex: Index) -> _Element? {
return safeIndex.distanceTo(endIndex) > 0 ? self[safeIndex] : nil
}
}
不正确，但它给出了一个概念
因为数组可以存储nil值，如果数组[index]调用越界，返回nil是没有意义的。
因为我们不知道用户想如何处理越界问题，所以使用自定义操作符没有意义。
相反，使用传统的控制流来展开对象并确保类型安全。
if let index = array.checkIndexForSafety(index:Int)
let item = array[safeIndex: index]
if let index = array.checkIndexForSafety(index:Int)
array[safeIndex: safeIndex] = myObject
extension Array {
@warn_unused_result public func checkIndexForSafety(index: Int) -> SafeIndex? {
if indices.contains(index) {
// wrap index number in object, so can ensure type safety
return SafeIndex(indexNumber: index)
} else {
return nil
}
}
subscript(index:SafeIndex) -> Element {
get {
return self[index.indexNumber]
}
set {
self[index.indexNumber] = newValue
}
}
// second version of same subscript, but with different method signature, allowing user to highlight using safe index
subscript(safeIndex index:SafeIndex) -> Element {
get {
return self[index.indexNumber]
}
set {
self[index.indexNumber] = newValue
}
}
}
public class SafeIndex {
var indexNumber:Int
init(indexNumber:Int){
self.indexNumber = indexNumber
}
}
我知道这是个老问题了。我现在用的是Swift5.1, OP是swift1还是swift2 ?
今天我需要这样的东西，但是我不想仅仅为一个地方添加一个完整的扩展，而想要一些更实用的扩展(更线程安全?)我也不需要防止负标，只需要保护那些可能超过数组末尾的负标:
let fruit = ["Apple", "Banana", "Coconut"]
let a = fruit.dropFirst(2).first // -> "Coconut"
let b = fruit.dropFirst(0).first // -> "Apple"
let c = fruit.dropFirst(10).first // -> nil
对于那些争论具有nil的序列的人，对于空集合返回nil的第一个和最后一个属性该怎么办?
我喜欢这个，因为我可以抓住现有的东西，用它来得到我想要的结果。我也知道dropFirst(n)不是一个完整的集合副本，只是一个切片。然后已经存在的第一个行为接管了我。
适用于Swift 2
尽管这个问题已经被回答过很多次了，但我想给出一个更符合Swift编程时尚走向的答案，用Crusty的话来说就是:“先考虑协议”。
• What do we want to do?
- Get an Element of an Array given an Index only when it's safe, and nil otherwise
• What should this functionality base it's implementation on?
- Array subscripting
• Where does it get this feature from?
- Its definition of struct Array in the Swift module has it
• Nothing more generic/abstract?
- It adopts protocol CollectionType which ensures it as well
• Nothing more generic/abstract?
- It adopts protocol Indexable as well...
• Yup, sounds like the best we can do. Can we then extend it to have this feature we want?
- But we have very limited types (no Int) and properties (no count) to work with now!
• It will be enough. Swift's stdlib is done pretty well ;)
extension Indexable {
public subscript(safe safeIndex: Index) -> _Element? {
return safeIndex.distanceTo(endIndex) > 0 ? self[safeIndex] : nil
}
}
不正确，但它给出了一个概念
