我有一个泛型类在我的项目与派生类。
public class GenericClass<T> : GenericInterface<T>
{
}
public class Test : GenericClass<SomeType>
{
}
是否有任何方法可以查明Type对象是否派生自GenericClass?
t.IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClass<>))
不管用。
我有一个泛型类在我的项目与派生类。
public class GenericClass<T> : GenericInterface<T>
{
}
public class Test : GenericClass<SomeType>
{
}
是否有任何方法可以查明Type对象是否派生自GenericClass?
t.IsSubclassOf(typeof(GenericClass<>))
不管用。
当前回答
这些都可以用linq轻松完成。这将找到泛型基类GenericBaseType的子类的任何类型。
IEnumerable<Type> allTypes = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetTypes();
IEnumerable<Type> mySubclasses = allTypes.Where(t => t.BaseType != null
&& t.BaseType.IsGenericType
&& t.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(GenericBaseType<,>));
其他回答
试试这段代码
static bool IsSubclassOfRawGeneric(Type generic, Type toCheck) {
while (toCheck != null && toCheck != typeof(object)) {
var cur = toCheck.IsGenericType ? toCheck.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : toCheck;
if (generic == cur) {
return true;
}
toCheck = toCheck.BaseType;
}
return false;
}
在fir3rpho3nixx和David Schmitt的出色回答的基础上,我修改了他们的代码,并添加了ShouldInheritOrImplementTypedGenericInterface测试(最后一个)。
/// <summary>
/// Find out if a child type implements or inherits from the parent type.
/// The parent type can be an interface or a concrete class, generic or non-generic.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="child"></param>
/// <param name="parent"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static bool InheritsOrImplements(this Type child, Type parent)
{
var currentChild = parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && child.IsGenericType ? child.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : child;
while (currentChild != typeof(object))
{
if (parent == currentChild || HasAnyInterfaces(parent, currentChild))
return true;
currentChild = currentChild.BaseType != null && parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && currentChild.BaseType.IsGenericType
? currentChild.BaseType.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
: currentChild.BaseType;
if (currentChild == null)
return false;
}
return false;
}
private static bool HasAnyInterfaces(Type parent, Type child)
{
return child.GetInterfaces().Any(childInterface =>
{
var currentInterface = parent.IsGenericTypeDefinition && childInterface.IsGenericType
? childInterface.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
: childInterface;
return currentInterface == parent;
});
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementNonGenericInterface()
{
Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IFooInterface)), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterface()
{
Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooBase)
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclass()
{
Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclassNotCaringAboutGenericTypeParameter()
{
Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<>)), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldNotInheritOrImplementGenericInterfaceByGenericSubclassNotCaringAboutGenericTypeParameter()
{
Assert.That(new GenericFooImplementor<string>().GetType()
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)), Is.False);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementNonGenericClass()
{
Assert.That(typeof(FooImplementor)
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementAnyBaseType()
{
Assert.That(typeof(GenericFooImplementor<>)
.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(FooBase)), Is.True);
}
[Test]
public void ShouldInheritOrImplementTypedGenericInterface()
{
GenericFooImplementor<int> obj = new GenericFooImplementor<int>();
Type t = obj.GetType();
Assert.IsTrue(t.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<int>)));
Assert.IsFalse(t.InheritsOrImplements(typeof(IGenericFooInterface<String>)));
}
你可以试试这个扩展
public static bool IsSubClassOfGenericClass(this Type type, Type genericClass,Type t)
{
return type.IsSubclassOf(genericClass.MakeGenericType(new[] { t }));
}
简单的解决方案:只需创建并添加第二个非泛型接口到泛型类:
public interface IGenericClass
{
}
public class GenericClass<T> : GenericInterface<T>, IGenericClass
{
}
然后用is as IsAssignableFrom等任何你喜欢的方式检查。
if (thing is IGenericClass)
{
// Do work
{
显然,只有当您能够编辑泛型类(OP似乎具有这种能力)时才有可能,但它比使用神秘的扩展方法更优雅、更可读。
这个游戏已经晚了…我对JarodPar的答案也有另一种排列。
下面是Type. issubclassof (Type),由reflector提供:
public virtual bool IsSubclassOf(Type c)
{
Type baseType = this;
if (!(baseType == c))
{
while (baseType != null)
{
if (baseType == c)
{
return true;
}
baseType = baseType.BaseType;
}
return false;
}
return false;
}
由此,我们看到它并没有做任何过于疯狂的事情,并且类似于JaredPar的迭代方法。到目前为止,一切顺利。这是我的版本(免责声明:没有彻底测试,所以如果你发现问题,请告诉我)
public static bool IsExtension(this Type thisType, Type potentialSuperType)
{
//
// protect ya neck
//
if (thisType == null || potentialSuperType == null || thisType == potentialSuperType) return false;
//
// don't need to traverse inheritance for interface extension, so check/do these first
//
if (potentialSuperType.IsInterface)
{
foreach (var interfaceType in thisType.GetInterfaces())
{
var tempType = interfaceType.IsGenericType ? interfaceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : interfaceType;
if (tempType == potentialSuperType)
{
return true;
}
}
}
//
// do the concrete type checks, iterating up the inheritance chain, as in orignal
//
while (thisType != null && thisType != typeof(object))
{
var cur = thisType.IsGenericType ? thisType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() : thisType;
if (potentialSuperType == cur)
{
return true;
}
thisType = thisType.BaseType;
}
return false;
}
基本上这只是System的一个扩展方法。类型-我这样做是为了故意将“thisType”类型限制为具体类型,因为我的直接用法是对类型对象的LINQ查询“where”谓词。我相信所有聪明的人都可以把它归结为一个有效的,通用的静态方法,如果你需要:)代码做了一些事情,答案的代码没有
open's it up to to general "extension" - i'm considering inheritance (think classes) as well as implementation (interfaces); method and parameter names are changed to better reflect this input null-validation (meah) input of same type (a class cannot extend itself) short-circuit execution if Type in question is an interface; because GetInterfaces() returns all implemented interfaces (even ones implemented in super-classes), you can simply loop through that collection not having to climb the inheritance tree
其余部分基本上与JaredPar的代码相同