下面的例子可能会有所帮助，

int main(void)
{
    double **a2d = new double*[5]; 
    /* initializing Number of rows, in this case 5 rows) */
    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
    {
        a2d[i] = new double[3]; /* initializing Number of columns, in this case 3 columns */
    }

    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
    {
        for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++)
        {
            a2d[i][j] = 1; /* Assigning value 1 to all elements */
        }
    }

    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
    {
        for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++)
        {
            cout << a2d[i][j] << endl;  /* Printing all elements to verify all elements have been correctly assigned or not */
        }
    }

    for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
        delete[] a2d[i];

    delete[] a2d;


    return 0;
}

在c++ 11中可以:

auto array = new double[M][N]; 

这样，内存就不会被初始化。要初始化它，可以这样做:

auto array = new double[M][N]();

示例程序(用"g++ -std=c++11"编译):

#include <iostream>
#include <utility>
#include <type_traits>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <cxxabi.h>
using namespace std;

int main()
{
    const auto M = 2;
    const auto N = 2;

    // allocate (no initializatoin)
    auto array = new double[M][N];

    // pollute the memory
    array[0][0] = 2;
    array[1][0] = 3;
    array[0][1] = 4;
    array[1][1] = 5;

    // re-allocate, probably will fetch the same memory block (not portable)
    delete[] array;
    array = new double[M][N];

    // show that memory is not initialized
    for(int r = 0; r < M; r++)
    {
        for(int c = 0; c < N; c++)
            cout << array[r][c] << " ";
        cout << endl;
    }
    cout << endl;

    delete[] array;

    // the proper way to zero-initialize the array
    array = new double[M][N]();

    // show the memory is initialized
    for(int r = 0; r < M; r++)
    {
        for(int c = 0; c < N; c++)
            cout << array[r][c] << " ";
        cout << endl;
    }

    int info;
    cout << abi::__cxa_demangle(typeid(array).name(),0,0,&info) << endl;

    return 0;
}

输出:

2 4 
3 5 

0 0 
0 0 
double (*) [2]

Typedef是你的朋友

在回顾并查看了许多其他答案之后，我发现需要进行更深层次的解释，因为许多其他答案要么存在性能问题，要么迫使您使用不寻常的或繁重的语法来声明数组，或访问数组元素(或以上所有问题)。

首先，这个答案假设您在编译时知道数组的尺寸。如果你这样做，那么这是最好的解决方案，因为它将提供最好的性能，并允许您使用标准数组语法来访问数组元素。

The reason this gives the best performance is because it allocates all of the arrays as a contiguous block of memory meaning that you are likely to have less page misses and better spacial locality. Allocating in a loop may cause the individual arrays to end up scattered on multiple non-contiguous pages through the virtual memory space as the allocation loop could be interrupted ( possibly multiple times ) by other threads or processes, or simply due to the discretion of the allocator filling in small, empty memory blocks it happens to have available.

其他好处是声明语法简单，数组访问语法标准。

在c++中使用new:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv) {

typedef double (array5k_t)[5000];

array5k_t *array5k = new array5k_t[5000];

array5k[4999][4999] = 10;
printf("array5k[4999][4999] == %f\n", array5k[4999][4999]);

return 0;
}

或使用calloc的C样式:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv) {

typedef double (*array5k_t)[5000];

array5k_t array5k = calloc(5000, sizeof(double)*5000);

array5k[4999][4999] = 10;
printf("array5k[4999][4999] == %f\n", array5k[4999][4999]);

return 0;
}

如何分配一个连续的多维数组在GNU c++ ?有一个GNU扩展允许“标准”语法工作。

问题似乎来自操作符new[]。请确保使用operator new:

double (* in)[n][n] = new (double[m][n][n]);  // GNU extension

这就是全部:你得到了一个c兼容的多维数组……

2D数组基本上是一个指针的1D数组，其中每个指针都指向一个1D数组，该数组将保存实际数据。

这里N是行，M是列。

动态分配

int** ary = new int*[N];
  for(int i = 0; i < N; i++)
      ary[i] = new int[M];

fill

for(int i = 0; i < N; i++)
    for(int j = 0; j < M; j++)
      ary[i][j] = i;

打印

for(int i = 0; i < N; i++)
    for(int j = 0; j < M; j++)
      std::cout << ary[i][j] << "\n";

free

for(int i = 0; i < N; i++)
    delete [] ary[i];
delete [] ary;

int **arr = new int* [NoOfRows]
for(int i = 0; i<NoOfRows; i++)
   arr[i] = new int[noOfColumn];

这是在c++中使用new声明2D数组的好方法 这里，NoOfRow显示了你需要多少行 ans noOfColumn显示你需要多少列