请尝试下面的存储过程。我已经核实了。我得到正确的结果，但没有使用groupby。

CREATE DEFINER=`ks_root`@`%` PROCEDURE `first_five_record_per_id`()
BEGIN
DECLARE query_string text;
DECLARE datasource1 varchar(24);
DECLARE done INT DEFAULT 0;
DECLARE tenants varchar(50);
DECLARE cur1 CURSOR FOR SELECT rid FROM demo1;
DECLARE CONTINUE HANDLER FOR NOT FOUND SET done = 1;

    SET @query_string='';

      OPEN cur1;
      read_loop: LOOP

      FETCH cur1 INTO tenants ;

      IF done THEN
        LEAVE read_loop;
      END IF;

      SET @datasource1 = tenants;
      SET @query_string = concat(@query_string,'(select * from demo  where `id` = ''',@datasource1,''' order by rate desc LIMIT 5) UNION ALL ');

       END LOOP; 
      close cur1;

    SET @query_string  = TRIM(TRAILING 'UNION ALL' FROM TRIM(@query_string));  
  select @query_string;
PREPARE stmt FROM @query_string;
EXECUTE stmt;
DEALLOCATE PREPARE stmt;

END

不，你不能任意地限制子查询(你可以在较新的mysql中有限地这样做，但不能每组5个结果)。

这是一个分组最大类型查询，在SQL中执行起来并不简单。在某些情况下，有很多更有效的方法来解决这个问题，但对于一般的top-n，你会想看看Bill对前面一个类似问题的答案。

与此问题的大多数解决方案一样，如果有多行具有相同的速率值，它可以返回超过5行，因此您可能仍然需要大量的后处理来检查这一点。

构建虚拟列(如Oracle中的RowID)

表:

CREATE TABLE `stack` 
(`year` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
`id` varchar(10) DEFAULT NULL,
`rate` float DEFAULT NULL) 
ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4

数据:

insert into stack values(2006,'p01',8);
insert into stack values(2001,'p01',5.9);
insert into stack values(2007,'p01',5.3);
insert into stack values(2009,'p01',4.4);
insert into stack values(2001,'p02',12.5);
insert into stack values(2004,'p02',12.4);
insert into stack values(2005,'p01',2.1);
insert into stack values(2000,'p01',0.8);
insert into stack values(2002,'p02',12.2);
insert into stack values(2002,'p01',3.9);
insert into stack values(2004,'p01',3.5);
insert into stack values(2003,'p02',10.3);
insert into stack values(2000,'p02',8.7);
insert into stack values(2006,'p02',4.6);
insert into stack values(2007,'p02',3.3);
insert into stack values(2003,'p01',7.4);
insert into stack values(2008,'p01',6.8);

SQL是这样的:

select t3.year,t3.id,t3.rate 
from (select t1.*, (select count(*) from stack t2 where t1.rate<=t2.rate and t1.id=t2.id) as rownum from stack t1) t3 
where rownum <=3 order by id,rate DESC;

如果删除t3中的where子句，则如下所示:

GET "TOP N Record"——>在where子句(t3的where子句)中添加rownum <=3;

选择“年份”——>在where子句中增加BETWEEN 2000 AND 2009 (t3的where子句);

对我来说

SUBSTRING_INDEX(group_concat(col_name order by desired_col_order_name), ',', N) 

完美的工作。没有复杂的查询。

例如:每组取top 1

SELECT 
    *
FROM
    yourtable
WHERE
    id IN (SELECT 
            SUBSTRING_INDEX(GROUP_CONCAT(id
                            ORDER BY rate DESC),
                        ',',
                        1) id
        FROM
            yourtable
        GROUP BY year)
ORDER BY rate DESC;

请尝试下面的存储过程。我已经核实了。我得到正确的结果，但没有使用groupby。

CREATE DEFINER=`ks_root`@`%` PROCEDURE `first_five_record_per_id`()
BEGIN
DECLARE query_string text;
DECLARE datasource1 varchar(24);
DECLARE done INT DEFAULT 0;
DECLARE tenants varchar(50);
DECLARE cur1 CURSOR FOR SELECT rid FROM demo1;
DECLARE CONTINUE HANDLER FOR NOT FOUND SET done = 1;

    SET @query_string='';

      OPEN cur1;
      read_loop: LOOP

      FETCH cur1 INTO tenants ;

      IF done THEN
        LEAVE read_loop;
      END IF;

      SET @datasource1 = tenants;
      SET @query_string = concat(@query_string,'(select * from demo  where `id` = ''',@datasource1,''' order by rate desc LIMIT 5) UNION ALL ');

       END LOOP; 
      close cur1;

    SET @query_string  = TRIM(TRAILING 'UNION ALL' FROM TRIM(@query_string));  
  select @query_string;
PREPARE stmt FROM @query_string;
EXECUTE stmt;
DEALLOCATE PREPARE stmt;

END

试试这个:

SELECT h.year, h.id, h.rate 
FROM (SELECT h.year, h.id, h.rate, IF(@lastid = (@lastid:=h.id), @index:=@index+1, @index:=0) indx 
      FROM (SELECT h.year, h.id, h.rate 
            FROM h
            WHERE h.year BETWEEN 2000 AND 2009 AND id IN (SELECT rid FROM table2)
            GROUP BY id, h.year
            ORDER BY id, rate DESC
            ) h, (SELECT @lastid:='', @index:=0) AS a
    ) h 
WHERE h.indx <= 5;