我在C#(ApplicationClass)中使用Excel互操作,并在finally子句中放置了以下代码:

while (System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(excelSheet) != 0) { }
excelSheet = null;
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();

尽管这种方法有效,但即使在我关闭Excel之后,Excel.exe进程仍处于后台。它只在我的应用程序被手动关闭后发布。

我做错了什么,或者是否有其他方法可以确保正确处理互操作对象?


当前回答

只是为了给这里列出的众多解决方案添加另一个解决方案,使用C++/ATL自动化(我想您可以使用类似于VB/C#??的东西)

Excel::_ApplicationPtr pXL = ...
  :
SendMessage ( ( HWND ) m_pXL->GetHwnd ( ), WM_DESTROY, 0, 0 ) ;

这对我来说很有魅力。。。

其他回答

我的解决方案

[DllImport("user32.dll")]
static extern int GetWindowThreadProcessId(int hWnd, out int lpdwProcessId);

private void GenerateExcel()
{
    var excel = new Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Application();
    int id;
    // Find the Excel Process Id (ath the end, you kill him
    GetWindowThreadProcessId(excel.Hwnd, out id);
    Process excelProcess = Process.GetProcessById(id);

try
{
    // Your code
}
finally
{
    excel.Quit();

    // Kill him !
    excelProcess.Kill();
}

更新:添加了C#代码,并链接到Windows作业

我花了一些时间试图解决这个问题,当时XtremeVBTalk是最活跃和响应最快的。这里有一个链接到我的原始文章,“即使应用程序崩溃,也要干净地关闭Excel互操作过程”。下面是文章的摘要,以及复制到本文的代码。

使用Application.Quit()和process.Kill()关闭Interop进程在很大程度上是有效的,但如果应用程序发生灾难性崩溃,则会失败。也就是说,如果应用程序崩溃,Excel进程仍将运行松散。解决方案是让操作系统使用Win32调用通过Windows作业对象处理进程的清理。当主应用程序失效时,相关的进程(即Excel)也将终止。

我发现这是一个干净的解决方案,因为操作系统正在进行真正的清理工作。您所要做的就是注册Excel进程。

Windows作业代码

包装Win32 API调用以注册互操作进程。

public enum JobObjectInfoType
{
    AssociateCompletionPortInformation = 7,
    BasicLimitInformation = 2,
    BasicUIRestrictions = 4,
    EndOfJobTimeInformation = 6,
    ExtendedLimitInformation = 9,
    SecurityLimitInformation = 5,
    GroupInformation = 11
}

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
public struct SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES
{
    public int nLength;
    public IntPtr lpSecurityDescriptor;
    public int bInheritHandle;
}

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
struct JOBOBJECT_BASIC_LIMIT_INFORMATION
{
    public Int64 PerProcessUserTimeLimit;
    public Int64 PerJobUserTimeLimit;
    public Int16 LimitFlags;
    public UInt32 MinimumWorkingSetSize;
    public UInt32 MaximumWorkingSetSize;
    public Int16 ActiveProcessLimit;
    public Int64 Affinity;
    public Int16 PriorityClass;
    public Int16 SchedulingClass;
}

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
struct IO_COUNTERS
{
    public UInt64 ReadOperationCount;
    public UInt64 WriteOperationCount;
    public UInt64 OtherOperationCount;
    public UInt64 ReadTransferCount;
    public UInt64 WriteTransferCount;
    public UInt64 OtherTransferCount;
}

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
struct JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION
{
    public JOBOBJECT_BASIC_LIMIT_INFORMATION BasicLimitInformation;
    public IO_COUNTERS IoInfo;
    public UInt32 ProcessMemoryLimit;
    public UInt32 JobMemoryLimit;
    public UInt32 PeakProcessMemoryUsed;
    public UInt32 PeakJobMemoryUsed;
}

public class Job : IDisposable
{
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Unicode)]
    static extern IntPtr CreateJobObject(object a, string lpName);

    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern bool SetInformationJobObject(IntPtr hJob, JobObjectInfoType infoType, IntPtr lpJobObjectInfo, uint cbJobObjectInfoLength);

    [DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
    static extern bool AssignProcessToJobObject(IntPtr job, IntPtr process);

    private IntPtr m_handle;
    private bool m_disposed = false;

    public Job()
    {
        m_handle = CreateJobObject(null, null);

        JOBOBJECT_BASIC_LIMIT_INFORMATION info = new JOBOBJECT_BASIC_LIMIT_INFORMATION();
        info.LimitFlags = 0x2000;

        JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION extendedInfo = new JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION();
        extendedInfo.BasicLimitInformation = info;

        int length = Marshal.SizeOf(typeof(JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION));
        IntPtr extendedInfoPtr = Marshal.AllocHGlobal(length);
        Marshal.StructureToPtr(extendedInfo, extendedInfoPtr, false);

        if (!SetInformationJobObject(m_handle, JobObjectInfoType.ExtendedLimitInformation, extendedInfoPtr, (uint)length))
            throw new Exception(string.Format("Unable to set information.  Error: {0}", Marshal.GetLastWin32Error()));
    }

    #region IDisposable Members

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }

    #endregion

    private void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (m_disposed)
            return;

        if (disposing) {}

        Close();
        m_disposed = true;
    }

    public void Close()
    {
        Win32.CloseHandle(m_handle);
        m_handle = IntPtr.Zero;
    }

    public bool AddProcess(IntPtr handle)
    {
        return AssignProcessToJobObject(m_handle, handle);
    }

}

关于构造函数代码的注释

在构造函数中,info.LimitFlags=0x2000;被调用。0x2000是JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE枚举值,MSDN将此值定义为:

当作业的最后一个句柄关闭。

获取进程ID(PID)的额外Win32 API调用

    [DllImport("user32.dll", SetLastError = true)]
    public static extern uint GetWindowThreadProcessId(IntPtr hWnd, out uint lpdwProcessId);

使用代码

    Excel.Application app = new Excel.ApplicationClass();
    Job job = new Job();
    uint pid = 0;
    Win32.GetWindowThreadProcessId(new IntPtr(app.Hwnd), out pid);
    job.AddProcess(Process.GetProcessById((int)pid).Handle);

我找到了一个有用的通用模板,它可以帮助实现COM对象的正确处置模式,这些对象在超出范围时需要调用Marshal.ReleaseComObject:

用法:

using (AutoReleaseComObject<Application> excelApplicationWrapper = new AutoReleaseComObject<Application>(new Application()))
{
    try
    {
        using (AutoReleaseComObject<Workbook> workbookWrapper = new AutoReleaseComObject<Workbook>(excelApplicationWrapper.ComObject.Workbooks.Open(namedRangeBase.FullName, false, false, missing, missing, missing, true, missing, missing, true, missing, missing, missing, missing, missing)))
        {
           // do something with your workbook....
        }
    }
    finally
    {
         excelApplicationWrapper.ComObject.Quit();
    } 
}

模板:

public class AutoReleaseComObject<T> : IDisposable
{
    private T m_comObject;
    private bool m_armed = true;
    private bool m_disposed = false;

    public AutoReleaseComObject(T comObject)
    {
        Debug.Assert(comObject != null);
        m_comObject = comObject;
    }

#if DEBUG
    ~AutoReleaseComObject()
    {
        // We should have been disposed using Dispose().
        Debug.WriteLine("Finalize being called, should have been disposed");

        if (this.ComObject != null)
        {
            Debug.WriteLine(string.Format("ComObject was not null:{0}, name:{1}.", this.ComObject, this.ComObjectName));
        }

        //Debug.Assert(false);
    }
#endif

    public T ComObject
    {
        get
        {
            Debug.Assert(!m_disposed);
            return m_comObject;
        }
    }

    private string ComObjectName
    {
        get
        {
            if(this.ComObject is Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Workbook)
            {
                return ((Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.Workbook)this.ComObject).Name;
            }

            return null;
        }
    }

    public void Disarm()
    {
        Debug.Assert(!m_disposed);
        m_armed = false;
    }

    #region IDisposable Members

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
#if DEBUG
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
#endif
    }

    #endregion

    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!m_disposed)
        {
            if (m_armed)
            {
                int refcnt = 0;
                do
                {
                    refcnt = System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject(m_comObject);
                } while (refcnt > 0);

                m_comObject = default(T);
            }

            m_disposed = true;
        }
    }
}

参考:

http://www.deez.info/sengelha/2005/02/11/useful-idisposable-class-3-autoreleasecomobject/

正如一些人可能已经写过的,如何关闭Excel(对象)不仅重要;如何打开它以及项目类型也很重要。

在WPF应用程序中,基本上相同的代码在没有或很少有问题的情况下工作。

我有一个项目,在该项目中,同一个Excel文件针对不同的参数值被处理了多次-例如,基于通用列表中的值对其进行分析。

我将所有与Excel相关的函数放在基类中,将解析器放在一个子类中(不同的解析器使用通用的Excel函数)。我不希望Excel为泛型列表中的每个项再次打开和关闭,所以我只在基类中打开了一次,并在子类中关闭了它。我在将代码移动到桌面应用程序时遇到了问题。我已经尝试了上面提到的许多解决方案。以前已经实现了GC.Collect(),是建议的两倍。

然后我决定将打开Excel的代码移到一个子类中。现在我不再只打开一次,而是创建一个新对象(基类),为每个项目打开Excel并在最后关闭它。有一些性能损失,但根据几个测试,Excel进程关闭时没有问题(在调试模式下),因此临时文件也会被删除。如果我能得到一些更新,我会继续测试并写更多。

底线是:您还必须检查初始化代码,特别是如果您有许多类等。

您需要意识到Excel对您正在运行的文化也非常敏感。

您可能会发现,在调用Excel函数之前,需要将区域性设置为EN-US。这并不适用于所有函数,但适用于其中一些函数。

    CultureInfo en_US = new System.Globalization.CultureInfo("en-US"); 
    System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = en_US;
    string filePathLocal = _applicationObject.ActiveWorkbook.Path;
    System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = orgCulture;

即使您正在使用VSTO,这也适用。

有关详细信息:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;我们;第320369季度