我喜欢下面这些方法来处理带有Flags属性集的枚举:

public static bool AnyOf(this object mask, object flags)
{
    return ((int)mask & (int)flags) != 0;
}
public static bool AllOf(this object mask, object flags)
{
    return ((int)mask & (int)flags) == (int)flags;
}
public static object SetOn(this object mask, object flags)
{
    return (int)mask | (int)flags;
}
etc.

使用示例:

var options = SomeOptions.OptionA;
options = options.SetOn(OptionB);
options = options.SetOn(OptionC);

if (options.AnyOf(SomeOptions.OptionA | SomeOptions.OptionB))
{
etc.

原始方法来自本文:http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/masksandflags.aspx?display=Print 我只是把它们转换成扩展方法。

但它们的一个问题是对象类型的参数，这意味着所有对象最终都被这些方法扩展，而理想情况下，它们应该只应用于枚举。

更新 根据评论，你可以绕过“签名污染”，以牺牲性能为代价，如下所示:

public static bool AnyOf(this Enum mask, object flags)
{
    return (Convert.ToInt642(mask) & (int)flags) != 0;
}

一些方便的字符串助手:

用法:

我讨厌不需要的空格尾随或引导字符串，因为字符串可以采取空值，这可能是棘手的，所以我使用这个:

public bool IsGroup { get { return !this.GroupName.IsNullOrTrimEmpty(); } }

这是另一个扩展方法，我使用一个新的验证框架，我正在试验。你可以看到regex扩展，帮助清理凌乱的regex:

public static bool IsRequiredWithLengthLessThanOrEqualNoSpecial(this String str, int length)
{
    return !str.IsNullOrTrimEmpty() &&
        str.RegexMatch(
            @"^[- \r\n\\\.!:*,@$%&""?\(\)\w']{1,{0}}$".RegexReplace(@"\{0\}", length.ToString()),
            RegexOptions.Multiline) == str;
}

来源:

public static class StringHelpers
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Same as String.IsNullOrEmpty except that
    /// it captures the Empty state for whitespace
    /// strings by Trimming first.
    /// </summary>
    public static bool IsNullOrTrimEmpty(this String helper)
    {
        if (helper == null)
            return true;
        else
            return String.Empty == helper.Trim();
    }

    public static int TrimLength(this String helper)
    {
        return helper.Trim().Length;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Returns the matched string from the regex pattern. The
    /// groupName is for named group match values in the form (?<name>group).
    /// </summary>
    public static string RegexMatch(this String helper, string pattern, RegexOptions options, string groupName)
    {
        if (groupName.IsNullOrTrimEmpty())
            return Regex.Match(helper, pattern, options).Value;
        else
            return Regex.Match(helper, pattern, options).Groups[groupName].Value;
    }

    public static string RegexMatch(this String helper, string pattern)
    {
        return RegexMatch(helper, pattern, RegexOptions.None, null);
    }

    public static string RegexMatch(this String helper, string pattern, RegexOptions options)
    {
        return RegexMatch(helper, pattern, options, null);
    }

    public static string RegexMatch(this String helper, string pattern, string groupName)
    {
        return RegexMatch(helper, pattern, RegexOptions.None, groupName);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Returns true if there is a match from the regex pattern
    /// </summary>
    public static bool IsRegexMatch(this String helper, string pattern, RegexOptions options)
    {
        return helper.RegexMatch(pattern, options).Length > 0;
    }

    public static bool IsRegexMatch(this String helper, string pattern)
    {
        return helper.IsRegexMatch(pattern, RegexOptions.None);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Returns a string where matching patterns are replaced by the replacement string.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="pattern">The regex pattern for matching the items to be replaced</param>
    /// <param name="replacement">The string to replace matching items</param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static string RegexReplace(this String helper, string pattern, string replacement, RegexOptions options)
    {
        return Regex.Replace(helper, pattern, replacement, options);
    }

    public static string RegexReplace(this String helper, string pattern, string replacement)
    {
        return Regex.Replace(helper, pattern, replacement, RegexOptions.None);
    }
}

我喜欢做很多正则表达式，所以我认为这些比添加using语句和额外的代码来处理命名组更容易。

我使用以下扩展来扩展所有的集合(也许有人发现这些有用):

/// <summary>
/// Collection Helper
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Use IEnumerable by default, but when altering or getting item at index use IList.
/// </remarks>
public static class CollectionHelper
{

    #region Alter;

    /// <summary>
    /// Swap item to another place
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="IndexA">Index a</param>
    /// <param name="IndexB">Index b</param>
    /// <returns>New collection</returns>
    public static IList<T> Swap<T>(this IList<T> @this, Int32 IndexA, Int32 IndexB)
    {
        T Temp = @this[IndexA];
        @this[IndexA] = @this[IndexB];
        @this[IndexB] = Temp;
        return @this;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Swap item to the left
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Index">Index</param>
    /// <returns>New collection</returns>
    public static IList<T> SwapLeft<T>(this IList<T> @this, Int32 Index)
    {
        return @this.Swap(Index, Index - 1);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Swap item to the right
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Index">Index</param>
    /// <returns>New collection</returns>
    public static IList<T> SwapRight<T>(this IList<T> @this, Int32 Index)
    {
        return @this.Swap(Index, Index + 1);
    }

    #endregion Alter;

    #region Action;

    /// <summary>
    /// Execute action at specified index
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Index">Index</param>
    /// <param name="ActionAt">Action to execute</param>
    /// <returns>New collection</returns>
    public static IList<T> ActionAt<T>(this IList<T> @this, Int32 Index, Action<T> ActionAt)
    {
        ActionAt(@this[Index]);
        return @this;
    }

    #endregion Action;

    #region Randomize;

    /// <summary>
    /// Take random items
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Count">Number of items to take</param>
    /// <returns>New collection</returns>
    public static IEnumerable<T> TakeRandom<T>(this IEnumerable<T> @this, Int32 Count)
    {
        return @this.Shuffle().Take(Count);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Take random item
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <returns>Item</returns>
    public static T TakeRandom<T>(this IEnumerable<T> @this)
    {
        return @this.TakeRandom(1).Single();
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Shuffle list
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <returns>New collection</returns>
    public static IEnumerable<T> Shuffle<T>(this IEnumerable<T> @this)
    {
        return @this.OrderBy(Item => Guid.NewGuid());
    }

    #endregion Randomize;

    #region Navigate;

    /// <summary>
    /// Get next item in collection and give first item, when last item is selected;
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Index">Index in collection</param>
    /// <returns>Next item</returns>
    public static T Next<T>(this IList<T> @this, ref Int32 Index)
    {
        Index = ++Index >= 0 && Index < @this.Count ? Index : 0;
        return @this[Index];
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Get previous item in collection and give last item, when first item is selected;
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Index">Index in collection</param>
    /// <returns>Previous item</returns>
    public static T Previous<T>(this IList<T> @this, ref Int32 Index)
    {
        Index = --Index >= 0 && Index < @this.Count ? Index : @this.Count - 1;
        return @this[Index];
    }

    #endregion Navigate;

    #region Clone;

    /// <summary>
    /// 
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Collection type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <returns>Cloned collection</returns>
    public static IEnumerable<T> Clone<T>(this IEnumerable<T> @this) where T : ICloneable
    {
        return @this.Select(Item => (T)Item.Clone());
    }

    #endregion Clone;

    #region String;

    /// <summary>
    /// Joins multiple string with Separator
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="this">Collection</param>
    /// <param name="Separator">Separator</param>
    /// <returns>Joined string</returns>
    public static String Join(this IEnumerable<String> @this, String Separator = "")
    {
        return String.Join(Separator, @this);
    }

    #endregion String;

}

我创建了一个扩展方法来在下拉菜单中选择一个项目。

下面是代码

 public static class Utilities
{
    public enum DropDownListSelectionType
    {
        ByValue,
        ByText
    }

    public static void SelectItem(this  System.Web.UI.WebControls.DropDownList drp, string selectedValue, DropDownListSelectionType type)
    {
        drp.ClearSelection();
        System.Web.UI.WebControls.ListItem li;
        if (type == DropDownListSelectionType.ByValue)
            li = drp.Items.FindByValue(selectedValue.Trim());
        else
            li = drp.Items.FindByText(selectedValue.Trim());
        if (li != null)
            li.Selected = true;
    }}

此方法可以由以下代码行调用，以按文本进行选择

DropDownList1.SelectItem("ABCD", Utilities.DropDownListSelectionType.ByText);

或者按值选择

DropDownList1.SelectItem("11", Utilities.DropDownListSelectionType.ByValue);

上面的代码不选择任何东西，如果它不能找到传递进来的文本/值。

没有检查整个线程，所以它可能已经在这里，但是:

public static class FluentOrderingExtensions
    public class FluentOrderer<T> : IEnumerable<T>
    {
        internal List<Comparison<T>> Comparers = new List<Comparison<T>>();

        internal IEnumerable<T> Source;

        public FluentOrderer(IEnumerable<T> source)
        {
            Source = source;
        }

        #region Implementation of IEnumerable

        public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
        {
            var workingArray = Source.ToArray();
            Array.Sort(workingArray, IterativeComparison);

            foreach(var element in workingArray) yield return element;
        }

        private int IterativeComparison(T a, T b)
        {
            foreach (var comparer in Comparers)
            {
                var result = comparer(a,b);
                if(result != 0) return result;
            }
            return 0;
        }

        IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
        {
            return GetEnumerator();
        }

        #endregion
    }

    public static FluentOrderer<T> OrderFluentlyBy<T,TResult>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T,TResult> predicate) 
        where TResult : IComparable<TResult>
    {
        var result = new FluentOrderer<T>(source);
        result.Comparers.Add((a,b)=>predicate(a).CompareTo(predicate(b)));
        return result;
    }

    public static FluentOrderer<T> OrderFluentlyByDescending<T,TResult>(this IEnumerable<T> source, Func<T,TResult> predicate) 
        where TResult : IComparable<TResult>
    {
        var result = new FluentOrderer<T>(source);
        result.Comparers.Add((a,b)=>predicate(a).CompareTo(predicate(b)) * -1);
        return result;
    }

    public static FluentOrderer<T> ThenBy<T, TResult>(this FluentOrderer<T> source, Func<T, TResult> predicate)
        where TResult : IComparable<TResult>
    {
        source.Comparers.Add((a, b) => predicate(a).CompareTo(predicate(b)));
        return source;
    }

    public static FluentOrderer<T> ThenByDescending<T, TResult>(this FluentOrderer<T> source, Func<T, TResult> predicate)
        where TResult : IComparable<TResult>
    {
        source.Comparers.Add((a, b) => predicate(a).CompareTo(predicate(b)) * -1);
        return source;
    }
}

用法:

var myFluentlyOrderedList = GetABunchOfComplexObjects()
    .OrderFluentlyBy(x=>x.PropertyA)
    .ThenByDescending(x=>x.PropertyB)
    .ThenBy(x=>x.SomeMethod())
    .ThenBy(x=>SomeOtherMethodAppliedTo(x))
    .ToList();

．.． 当然，假设所有的谓词都返回与自身icomcomparable的类型。如果使用像MergeSort这样的稳定排序，而不是。net内置的快速排序，它会更好地工作，但它提供了类似于SQL的可读多字段排序能力(无论如何，它是方法链所能获得的最接近的功能)。您可以通过定义重载来接受比较lambda，而不是基于谓词创建它，从而扩展它以容纳非IComparable的成员。

EDIT: A little explanation, since the commenter got some upticks: this set of methods improves upon the basic OrderBy() functionality by allowing you to sort based on multiple fields in descending order of importance. A real-world example would be sorting a list of invoices by customer, then by invoice number (or invoice date). Other methods of getting the data in this order either wouldn't work (OrderBy() uses an unstable sort, so it cannot be chained) or would be inefficient and not look like it does what you're trying to do.

灵感来自弦。IsNullOrEmpty

要验证给定的List为空或空

public static bool IsNullOrEmpty<TSource>(this List<TSource> src)
{            
    return (src == null || src.Count == 0);
}

这个是验证给定的两个文件和属性

public static bool Compare(this FileInfo f1, FileInfo f2, string propertyName)
{
    try
    {
        PropertyInfo p1 = f1.GetType().GetProperty(propertyName);
        PropertyInfo p2 = f2.GetType().GetProperty(propertyName);

        if (p1.GetValue(f1, null) == p2.GetValue(f1, null))
            return true;
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        return false;
    }
    return false;
}

像这样使用它

FileInfo fo = new FileInfo("c:\\netlog.txt");
FileInfo f1 = new FileInfo("c:\\regkey.txt");

fo.compare(f1, "CreationTime");