我找到一个库套接字。IO来测试异步逻辑。使用LinkedBlockingQueue看起来简单。这里有一个例子:

    @Test(timeout = TIMEOUT)
public void message() throws URISyntaxException, InterruptedException {
    final BlockingQueue<Object> values = new LinkedBlockingQueue<Object>();

    socket = client();
    socket.on(Socket.EVENT_CONNECT, new Emitter.Listener() {
        @Override
        public void call(Object... objects) {
            socket.send("foo", "bar");
        }
    }).on(Socket.EVENT_MESSAGE, new Emitter.Listener() {
        @Override
        public void call(Object... args) {
            values.offer(args);
        }
    });
    socket.connect();

    assertThat((Object[])values.take(), is(new Object[] {"hello client"}));
    assertThat((Object[])values.take(), is(new Object[] {"foo", "bar"}));
    socket.disconnect();
}

使用LinkedBlockingQueue使用API来阻塞直到得到结果，就像同步方式一样。并设置超时，以避免假设有太多时间等待结果。

我更喜欢使用等待和通知。它简单明了。

@Test
public void test() throws Throwable {
    final boolean[] asyncExecuted = {false};
    final Throwable[] asyncThrowable= {null};

    // do anything async
    new Thread(new Runnable() {
        @Override
        public void run() {
            try {
                // Put your test here.
                fail(); 
            }
            // lets inform the test thread that there is an error.
            catch (Throwable throwable){
                asyncThrowable[0] = throwable;
            }
            // ensure to release asyncExecuted in case of error.
            finally {
                synchronized (asyncExecuted){
                    asyncExecuted[0] = true;
                    asyncExecuted.notify();
                }
            }
        }
    }).start();

    // Waiting for the test is complete
    synchronized (asyncExecuted){
        while(!asyncExecuted[0]){
            asyncExecuted.wait();
        }
    }

    // get any async error, including exceptions and assertationErrors
    if(asyncThrowable[0] != null){
        throw asyncThrowable[0];
    }
}

基本上，我们需要创建一个最终的数组引用，在匿名内部类中使用。我宁愿创建一个布尔[]，因为如果我们需要wait()，我可以设置一个值来控制。当一切都完成后，我们只需释放asyncExecuted。

如果你想测试逻辑，不要异步测试。

例如，测试这段代码，它对异步方法的结果起作用。

public class Example {
    private Dependency dependency;

    public Example(Dependency dependency) {
        this.dependency = dependency;            
    }

    public CompletableFuture<String> someAsyncMethod(){
        return dependency.asyncMethod()
                .handle((r,ex) -> {
                    if(ex != null) {
                        return "got exception";
                    } else {
                        return r.toString();
                    }
                });
    }
}

public class Dependency {
    public CompletableFuture<Integer> asyncMethod() {
        // do some async stuff       
    }
}

在测试中模拟使用同步实现的依赖关系。单元测试是完全同步的，运行时间为150毫秒。

public class DependencyTest {
    private Example sut;
    private Dependency dependency;

    public void setup() {
        dependency = Mockito.mock(Dependency.class);;
        sut = new Example(dependency);
    }

    @Test public void success() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
        when(dependency.asyncMethod()).thenReturn(CompletableFuture.completedFuture(5));

        // When
        CompletableFuture<String> result = sut.someAsyncMethod();

        // Then
        assertThat(result.isCompletedExceptionally(), is(equalTo(false)));
        String value = result.get();
        assertThat(value, is(equalTo("5")));
    }

    @Test public void failed() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
        // Given
        CompletableFuture<Integer> c = new CompletableFuture<Integer>();
        c.completeExceptionally(new RuntimeException("failed"));
        when(dependency.asyncMethod()).thenReturn(c);

        // When
        CompletableFuture<String> result = sut.someAsyncMethod();

        // Then
        assertThat(result.isCompletedExceptionally(), is(equalTo(false)));
        String value = result.get();
        assertThat(value, is(equalTo("got exception")));
    }
}

你不测试异步行为，但你可以测试逻辑是否正确。

我找到一个库套接字。IO来测试异步逻辑。使用LinkedBlockingQueue看起来简单。这里有一个例子:

    @Test(timeout = TIMEOUT)
public void message() throws URISyntaxException, InterruptedException {
    final BlockingQueue<Object> values = new LinkedBlockingQueue<Object>();

    socket = client();
    socket.on(Socket.EVENT_CONNECT, new Emitter.Listener() {
        @Override
        public void call(Object... objects) {
            socket.send("foo", "bar");
        }
    }).on(Socket.EVENT_MESSAGE, new Emitter.Listener() {
        @Override
        public void call(Object... args) {
            values.offer(args);
        }
    });
    socket.connect();

    assertThat((Object[])values.take(), is(new Object[] {"hello client"}));
    assertThat((Object[])values.take(), is(new Object[] {"foo", "bar"}));
    socket.disconnect();
}

使用LinkedBlockingQueue使用API来阻塞直到得到结果，就像同步方式一样。并设置超时，以避免假设有太多时间等待结果。

这里有很多答案，但一个简单的答案是创建一个完整的CompletableFuture并使用它:

CompletableFuture.completedFuture("donzo")

所以在我的测试中:

this.exactly(2).of(mockEventHubClientWrapper).sendASync(with(any(LinkedList.class)));
this.will(returnValue(new CompletableFuture<>().completedFuture("donzo")));

我只是确保所有这些东西都会被调用。如果你使用下面的代码，这个技巧是有效的:

CompletableFuture.allOf(calls.toArray(new CompletableFuture[0])).join();

它将压缩通过它，因为所有的CompletableFutures都完成了!

JUnit 5有断言。assertTimeout(Duration, Executable)/ asserttimeoutpreempemptive()(请阅读每个的Javadoc以了解差异)和Mockito有verify(mock, timeout(毫秒).times(x))。

Assertions.assertTimeout(Duration.ofMillis(1000), () -> 
    myReactiveService.doSth().subscribe()
);

And:

Mockito.verify(myReactiveService, 
    timeout(1000).times(0)).doSth(); // cannot use never() here

管道中的超时可能是不确定的/脆弱的。所以要小心。