我们有2个不同的术语(Call-by-Value/Call-by-Reference)但至少有3(!)不同的方式处理上述数据,当将其转移到一个方法:

我们的数据是复制的,复制加到一个方法. 复制的变化不会在外面传播.(想想一个 int 在 Java 或 C++ 或 C#.) 一个指标(记忆地址)我们的数据加到方法而不是. 我们的数据的变化加到外面传播. 我们也可以指向一些新的例子,让我们的原始数据危害。

在 OO 世界中, #1 是 Call-by-Value 和 #2 是 Call-by-Reference. 但是,由于我们只有两个条件为三个选项,没有两个条件之间的明确定义,由于选项 #3 。

“为什么Java开发人员会坚持自己的术语?”

“有没有解决这个混乱的办法?”

最终,不管我们称之为什么,因为只要我们彼此理解,没有混乱。

Java 按值传输参考。

因此,你不能改变通过的参考。

一个简单的测试,以检查一个语言是否支持通过参考,只是写一个传统的交换。

一个传统的交换方法或函数采取两个论点,并交换它们,以便转换到函数的变量在函数之外发生变化。

(非Java) 基本交换功能结构

swap(Type arg1, Type arg2) {
    Type temp = arg1;
    arg1 = arg2;
    arg2 = temp;
}

如果你能在你的语言中写出这样的方法/函数,那么

Type var1 = ...;
Type var2 = ...;
swap(var1,var2);

事实上,它交换了 var1 和 var2 变量的值,语言支持 pass-by-reference. 但 Java 不允许这样的东西,因为它支持只通过值,而不是指标或参考。

public void foo(Object param)
{
  // some code in foo...
}

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  foo(obj);
}

它是相同的......

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  Object param = obj;

  // some code in foo...
}

不要考虑在这个讨论中不相关的站点。

你会遇到的最常见的运营商之一是简单的任务运营商“="......它将其右上的值归分为其左上的运营商: int cadence = 0; int speed = 0; int gear = 1; 这个运营商也可以用于对象归分对象参考。

很明显,这个运营商如何以两种不同的方式行动:分配值和分配参考;最后,当它是一个对象......第一,当它不是一个对象,即当它是一个原始的。

真相在代码中,让我们尝试一下:

public class AssignmentEvaluation
{
  static public class MyInteger
  {
    public int value = 0;
  }

  static public void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println("Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width\n");

    MyInteger height = new MyInteger();
    MyInteger width  = new MyInteger();

    System.out.println("[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values");

    height.value = 9;
    width.value  = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things! \n");

    System.out.println("[2] Assign to height's value the width's value");

    height.value = width.value;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things yet! \n");

    System.out.println("[4] Assign to height the width object");

    height = width;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are the same thing now! \n");

    System.out.println("[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value");

    height = new MyInteger();
    height.value = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things again! \n");
  }
}

这就是我跑步的结果:

Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width

[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things! 

[2] Assign to height's value the width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things yet! 

[4] Assign to height the width object
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 9, we are the same thing now! 

[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 9, we are different things again! 

我们不能那么确定,因为在 [6] 对象是相同的,然后我们将一个新的对象归分给其中一个,然后,对象有不同的价值! 他们现在如何区分,如果他们是相同的? 他们应该在这里也是相同的!!!

此操作员也可以用于对象分配对象参考。

经过全面的讨论,我认为现在是时候将所有严重的结果聚集在一起。

/**
 * 
 * @author Sam Ginrich
 * 
 * All Rights Reserved!
 * 
 */
public class JavaIsPassByValue
{

    static class SomeClass
    {
        int someValue;

        public SomeClass(int someValue)
        {
            this.someValue = someValue;
        }
    }

    static void passReferenceByValue(SomeClass someObject)
    {
        if (someObject == null)
        {
            throw new NullPointerException(
                    "This Object Reference was passed by Value,\r\n   that's why you don't get a value from it.");
        }
        someObject.someValue = 49;
    }

    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
        SomeClass someObject = new SomeClass(27);
        System.out.println("Here is the original value: " + someObject.someValue);

        passReferenceByValue(someObject);
        System.out.println(
                "\nAs ´Java is pass by value´,\r\n   everything without exception is passed by value\r\n   and so an object's attribute cannot change: "
                    + someObject.someValue);

        System.out.println();
        passReferenceByValue(null);
    }

) )

从输出中可以很容易地看到,在Java中,一切都通过价值,如此简单!

Here is the original value: 27

As ´Java is pass by value´,
   everything without exception is passed by value
   and so an object´s attribute cannot change: 49

'Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException: This Object Reference was passed by value,
   that´s why you don´t get a value from it. 
    at JavaIsPassByValue.passReferenceByValue(JavaIsPassByValue.java:26)
    at JavaIsPassByValue.main(JavaIsPassByValue.java:43)

对于简单性和言语性 其通过值参考:

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Dog aDog = new Dog("Max");
    Dog oldDog = aDog;

    // we pass the object to foo
    foo(aDog);
    // aDog variable is still pointing to the "Max" dog when foo(...) returns
    aDog.getName().equals("Max"); // true
    aDog.getName().equals("Fifi"); // false
    aDog == oldDog; // true
}

public static void foo(Dog d) {
    d.getName().equals("Max"); // true
    // change d inside of foo() to point to a new Dog instance "Fifi"
    d = new Dog("Fifi");
    d.getName().equals("Fifi"); // true
}