public void foo(Object param)
{
  // some code in foo...
}

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  foo(obj);
}

它是相同的......

public void bar()
{
  Object obj = new Object();

  Object param = obj;

  // some code in foo...
}

不要考虑在这个讨论中不相关的站点。

你会遇到的最常见的运营商之一是简单的任务运营商“="......它将其右上的值归分为其左上的运营商: int cadence = 0; int speed = 0; int gear = 1; 这个运营商也可以用于对象归分对象参考。

很明显,这个运营商如何以两种不同的方式行动:分配值和分配参考;最后,当它是一个对象......第一,当它不是一个对象,即当它是一个原始的。

真相在代码中,让我们尝试一下:

public class AssignmentEvaluation
{
  static public class MyInteger
  {
    public int value = 0;
  }

  static public void main(String[] args)
  {
    System.out.println("Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width\n");

    MyInteger height = new MyInteger();
    MyInteger width  = new MyInteger();

    System.out.println("[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values");

    height.value = 9;
    width.value  = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things! \n");

    System.out.println("[2] Assign to height's value the width's value");

    height.value = width.value;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things yet! \n");

    System.out.println("[4] Assign to height the width object");

    height = width;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", are we the same thing now? \n");

    System.out.println("[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value");

    height.value = 9;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are the same thing now! \n");

    System.out.println("[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value");

    height = new MyInteger();
    height.value = 1;

    System.out.println("->  height is " + height.value + " and width is " + width.value + ", we are different things again! \n");
  }
}

这就是我跑步的结果:

Assignment operator evaluation using two MyInteger objects named height and width

[1] Assign distinct integers to height and width values
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things! 

[2] Assign to height's value the width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[3] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 1, we are different things yet! 

[4] Assign to height the width object
->  height is 1 and width is 1, are we the same thing now? 

[5] Assign to height's value an integer other than width's value
->  height is 9 and width is 9, we are the same thing now! 

[6] Assign to height a new MyInteger and an integer other than width's value
->  height is 1 and width is 9, we are different things again! 

我们不能那么确定,因为在 [6] 对象是相同的,然后我们将一个新的对象归分给其中一个,然后,对象有不同的价值! 他们现在如何区分,如果他们是相同的? 他们应该在这里也是相同的!!!

此操作员也可以用于对象分配对象参考。

Java 使用 pass-by-value,但效果不同的是你是否使用原始或参考类型。

当你将原始类型作为论点转移到一种方法时,它将获得原始类型的副本,而方法块内的任何变化都不会改变原始变量。

当您将参考类型作为一个论点转移到一个方法时,它仍然得到一个副本,但它是对对象的参考的副本(换句话说,您正在获得记忆地址的副本在对象所在地),因此对象中的任何变化在方法的区块内将影响原始对象在区块外。

只需显示对比,请比较以下 C++ 和 Java 剪辑:

在 C++ 中: 注意: 坏代码 - 记忆泄漏! 但它证明了这一点。

void cppMethod(int val, int &ref, Dog obj, Dog &objRef, Dog *objPtr, Dog *&objPtrRef)
{
    val = 7; // Modifies the copy
    ref = 7; // Modifies the original variable
    obj.SetName("obj"); // Modifies the copy of Dog passed
    objRef.SetName("objRef"); // Modifies the original Dog passed
    objPtr->SetName("objPtr"); // Modifies the original Dog pointed to 
                               // by the copy of the pointer passed.
    objPtr = new Dog("newObjPtr");  // Modifies the copy of the pointer, 
                                   // leaving the original object alone.
    objPtrRef->SetName("objRefPtr"); // Modifies the original Dog pointed to 
                                    // by the original pointer passed. 
    objPtrRef = new Dog("newObjPtrRef"); // Modifies the original pointer passed
}

int main()
{
    int a = 0;
    int b = 0;
    Dog d0 = Dog("d0");
    Dog d1 = Dog("d1");
    Dog *d2 = new Dog("d2");
    Dog *d3 = new Dog("d3");
    cppMethod(a, b, d0, d1, d2, d3);
    // a is still set to 0
    // b is now set to 7
    // d0 still have name "d0"
    // d1 now has name "objRef"
    // d2 now has name "objPtr"
    // d3 now has name "newObjPtrRef"
}

在Java,

public static void javaMethod(int val, Dog objPtr)
{
   val = 7; // Modifies the copy
   objPtr.SetName("objPtr") // Modifies the original Dog pointed to 
                            // by the copy of the pointer passed.
   objPtr = new Dog("newObjPtr");  // Modifies the copy of the pointer, 
                                  // leaving the original object alone.
}

public static void main()
{
    int a = 0;
    Dog d0 = new Dog("d0");
    javaMethod(a, d0);
    // a is still set to 0
    // d0 now has name "objPtr"
}

Java 只有兩種通過: 根據內置類型的價值,並根據對象類型的指標的價值。

斯科特·斯坦奇菲尔德先生写了一个很好的答案. 这里是你要确认的课堂,他是什么意思:

public class Dog {

    String dog ;
    static int x_static;
    int y_not_static;

    public String getName()
    {
        return this.dog;
    }

    public Dog(String dog)
    {
        this.dog = dog;
    }

    public void setName(String name)
    {
        this.dog = name;
    }

    public static void foo(Dog someDog)
    {
        x_static = 1;
        // y_not_static = 2;  // not possible !!
        someDog.setName("Max");     // AAA
        someDog = new Dog("Fifi");  // BBB
        someDog.setName("Rowlf");   // CCC
    }

    public static void main(String args[])
    {
        Dog myDog = new Dog("Rover");
        foo(myDog);
        System.out.println(myDog.getName());
    }
}

因此,我们从主()一个名叫Rover的狗,然后我们将一个新的地址给我们通过的指标,但最终,狗的名字不是Rover,也不是Fifi,也许不是Rowlf,但Max。

Java 总是通过值的论点,而不是参考。

让我们用一个例子来解释这一点:

public class Main {

     public static void main(String[] args) {
          Foo f = new Foo("f");
          changeReference(f); // It won't change the reference!
          modifyReference(f); // It will modify the object that the reference variable "f" refers to!
     }

     public static void changeReference(Foo a) {
          Foo b = new Foo("b");
          a = b;
     }

     public static void modifyReference(Foo c) {
          c.setAttribute("c");
     }

}

我将在步骤中解释这一点:

宣布一个参考名为Foo类型,并将其分配给一个新的Foo类型对象与属性“f”。Foo f =新Foo(“f”);从方法侧,一个Foo类型的参考名称A被宣布,它最初被分配为零。

我希望你现在明白如何通过对象作为论点在Java工作:)

我从一本关于Java认证的书中取了这个代码和解释,并做了一些小变化,我认为这是一个很好的图像,通过对象的价值。在下面的代码中,重新分配g不会重新分配f!在条()方法的结尾,创建了两个Foo对象,一个是由当地变量f和一个是由当地(论点)变量g提到的。

package test.abc;

public class TestObject {

    /**
     * @param args
     */
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        bar();
    }

    static void bar() {
        Foo f = new Foo();
        System.out.println("Object reference for f: " + f);
        f.setName("James");
        doStuff(f);
        System.out.println(f.getName());
        //Can change the state of an object variable in f, but can't change the object reference for f.
        //You still have 2 foo objects.
        System.out.println("Object reference for f: " + f);
        }

    static void doStuff(Foo g) {
            g.setName("Boo");
            g = new Foo();
            System.out.println("Object reference for g: " + g);
        }
}


package test.abc;

public class Foo {
    public String name = "";

    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }

    public void setName(String name) {
        this.name = name;
    }

}

对象参考 f: test.abc.Foo@62f72617