我试图创建一个通用扩展，使用'TryParse'来检查字符串是否为给定类型:
public static bool Is<T>(this string input)
{
T notUsed;
return T.TryParse(input, out notUsed);
}
这将无法编译，因为它无法解析符号TryParse
据我所知，“TryParse”不是任何接口的一部分。
这有可能吗?
更新:
使用以下我想出的答案:
public static bool Is<T>(this string input)
{
try
{
TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(typeof(T)).ConvertFromString(input);
}
catch
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
它工作得很好，但我认为以这种方式使用异常对我来说不合适。
更新2:
修改为传递类型而不是使用泛型:
public static bool Is(this string input, Type targetType)
{
try
{
TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(targetType).ConvertFromString(input);
return true;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
这是另一个选择。
我编写了一个类，可以轻松注册任意数量的TryParse处理程序。它让我这样做:
var tp = new TryParser();
tp.Register<int>(int.TryParse);
tp.Register<decimal>(decimal.TryParse);
tp.Register<double>(double.TryParse);
int x;
if (tp.TryParse("42", out x))
{
Console.WriteLine(x);
};
我将42打印到控制台。
这个类是:
public class TryParser
{
public delegate bool TryParseDelegate<T>(string s, out T result);
private Dictionary<Type, Delegate> _tryParsers = new Dictionary<Type, Delegate>();
public void Register<T>(TryParseDelegate<T> d)
{
_tryParsers[typeof(T)] = d;
}
public bool Deregister<T>()
{
return _tryParsers.Remove(typeof(T));
}
public bool TryParse<T>(string s, out T result)
{
if (!_tryParsers.ContainsKey(typeof(T)))
{
throw new ArgumentException("Does not contain parser for " + typeof(T).FullName + ".");
}
var d = (TryParseDelegate<T>)_tryParsers[typeof(T)];
return d(s, out result);
}
}
我把一堆想法放在一起，最终得到了一个非常简短的解决方案。
这是一个字符串的扩展方法
enter code here
我在数值类型上使用与TryParse方法相同的足迹
/// <summary>
/// string.TryParse()
///
/// This generic extension method will take a string
/// make sure it is not null or empty
/// make sure it represents some type of number e.g. "123" not "abc"
/// It then calls the appropriate converter for the type of T
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of the desired retrunValue e.g. int, float, byte, decimal...</typeparam>
/// <param name="targetText">The text to be converted</param>
/// <param name="returnValue">a populated value of the type T or the default(T) value which is likely to be 0</param>
/// <returns>true if the string was successfully parsed and converted otherwise false</returns>
/// <example>
/// float testValue = 0;
/// if ( "1234".TryParse<float>( out testValue ) )
/// {
/// doSomethingGood();
/// }
/// else
/// {
/// handleTheBadness();
/// }
/// </example>
public static bool TryParse<T>(this string targetText, out T returnValue )
{
bool returnStatus = false;
returnValue = default(T);
//
// make sure the string is not null or empty and likely a number...
// call whatever you like here or just leave it out - I would
// at least make sure the string was not null or empty
//
if ( ValidatedInputAnyWayYouLike(targetText) )
{
//
// try to catch anything that blows up in the conversion process...
//
try
{
var type = typeof(T);
var converter = TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(type);
if (converter != null && converter.IsValid(targetText))
{
returnValue = (T)converter.ConvertFromString(targetText);
returnStatus = true;
}
}
catch
{
// just swallow the exception and return the default values for failure
}
}
return (returnStatus);
}
'''
我使用Charlie Brown的答案作为Json.NET的JObject扩展方法。
public static class JObjectExtension
{
public delegate bool TryParseHandler<T>(string value, out T result);
public static bool TryParsePropertyAs<T>(
this JObject jObject,
string propertyName,
TryParseHandler<T> parser,
out T value)
{
value = default;
if (!jObject.TryGetValue(propertyName, out var jToken)) return false;
if (!parser(jToken.Value<string>(), out T result)) return false;
value = result;
return true;
}
}
