我试图创建一个通用扩展，使用'TryParse'来检查字符串是否为给定类型:
public static bool Is<T>(this string input)
{
T notUsed;
return T.TryParse(input, out notUsed);
}
这将无法编译，因为它无法解析符号TryParse
据我所知，“TryParse”不是任何接口的一部分。
这有可能吗?
更新:
使用以下我想出的答案:
public static bool Is<T>(this string input)
{
try
{
TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(typeof(T)).ConvertFromString(input);
}
catch
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
它工作得很好，但我认为以这种方式使用异常对我来说不合适。
更新2:
修改为传递类型而不是使用泛型:
public static bool Is(this string input, Type targetType)
{
try
{
TypeDescriptor.GetConverter(targetType).ConvertFromString(input);
return true;
}
catch
{
return false;
}
}
我设法弄到了这样的东西
var result = "44".TryParse<int>();
Console.WriteLine( "type={0}, value={1}, valid={2}",
result.Value.GetType(), result.Value, result.IsValid );
这是我的代码
public static class TryParseGeneric
{
//extend int
public static dynamic TryParse<T>( this string input )
{
dynamic runner = new StaticMembersDynamicWrapper( typeof( T ) );
T value;
bool isValid = runner.TryParse( input, out value );
return new { IsValid = isValid, Value = value };
}
}
public class StaticMembersDynamicWrapper : DynamicObject
{
private readonly Type _type;
public StaticMembersDynamicWrapper( Type type ) { _type = type; }
// Handle static properties
public override bool TryGetMember( GetMemberBinder binder, out object result )
{
PropertyInfo prop = _type.GetProperty( binder.Name, BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy | BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Public );
if ( prop == null )
{
result = null;
return false;
}
result = prop.GetValue( null, null );
return true;
}
// Handle static methods
public override bool TryInvokeMember( InvokeMemberBinder binder, object [] args, out object result )
{
var methods = _type
.GetMethods( BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy | BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Public ).Where( methodInfo => methodInfo.Name == binder.Name );
var method = methods.FirstOrDefault();
if ( method == null )
{
result = null;
return false;
}
result = method.Invoke( null, args );
return true;
}
}
StaticMembersDynamicWrapper改编自David Ebbo的文章(它抛出了一个ambiguous uousmatchexception)
利用上面的信息，这就是我开发的东西。它将直接转换对象是可能的，否则它将把对象转换为字符串并调用所需对象类型的TryParse方法。
我将每个方法都缓存在字典中，以减少方法获取负载。
可以测试对象是否可以直接转换为目标类型，这将进一步减少字符串转换部分。但我先不讲这个。
/// <summary>
/// Used to store TryParse converter methods
/// </summary>
private static readonly Dictionary<Type, MethodInfo> TypeConverters = new Dictionary<Type, MethodInfo>();
/// <summary>
/// Attempt to parse the input object to the output type
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">output type</typeparam>
/// <param name="obj">input object</param>
/// <param name="result">output result on success, default(T) on failure</param>
/// <returns>Success</returns>
public static bool TryParse<T>([CanBeNull] object obj, out T result)
{
result = default(T);
try
{
switch (obj)
{
// don't waste time on null objects
case null: return false;
// if the object is already of type T, just return the value
case T val:
result = val;
return true;
}
// convert the object into type T via string conversion
var input = ((obj as string) ?? obj.ToString()).Trim();
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(input)) return false;
var type = typeof (T);
Debug.WriteLine($"Info: {nameof(TryParse)}<{type.Name}>({obj.GetType().Name}=\"{input}\")");
if (! TypeConverters.TryGetValue(type, out var method))
{
// get the TryParse method for this type
method = type.GetMethod("TryParse",
new[]
{
typeof (string),
Type.GetType($"{type.FullName}&")
});
if (method is null)
Debug.WriteLine($"FAILED: Cannot get method for {type.Name}.TryParse()");
// store it so we don't have to do this again
TypeConverters.Add(type, method);
}
// have to keep a reference to parameters if you want to get the returned ref value
var parameters = new object[] {input, null};
if ((bool?) method?.Invoke(null, parameters) == true)
{
result = (T) parameters[1];
return true;
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Debug.WriteLine(ex);
}
return false;
}
