在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
当前回答
这是我的两分钱
static class Program
{
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
bool createdNew;
using (new Mutex(true, "MyApp", out createdNew))
{
if (createdNew) {
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
var mainClass = new SynGesturesLogic();
Application.ApplicationExit += mainClass.tray_exit;
Application.Run();
}
else
{
var current = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
foreach (var process in Process.GetProcessesByName(current.ProcessName).Where(process => process.Id != current.Id))
{
NativeMethods.SetForegroundWindow(process.MainWindowHandle);
break;
}
}
}
}
}
其他回答
Just some thoughts: There are cases when requiring that only one instance of an application is not "lame" as some would have you believe. Database apps, etc. are an order of magnitude more difficult if one allows multiple instances of the app for a single user to access a database (you know, all that updating all the records that are open in multiple instances of the app on the users machine, etc.). First, for the "name collision thing, don't use a human readable name - use a GUID instead or, even better a GUID + the human readable name. Chances of name collision just dropped off the radar and the Mutex doesn't care. As someone pointed out, a DOS attack would suck, but if the malicious person has gone to the trouble of getting the mutex name and incorporating it into their app, you are pretty much a target anyway and will have to do MUCH more to protect yourself than just fiddle a mutex name. Also, if one uses the variant of: new Mutex(true, "some GUID plus Name", out AIsFirstInstance), you already have your indicator as to whether or not the Mutex is the first instance.
下面是一个示例,它允许您拥有应用程序的单个实例。当加载任何新实例时,它们将参数传递给正在运行的主实例。
public partial class App : Application
{
private static Mutex SingleMutex;
public static uint MessageId;
private void Application_Startup(object sender, StartupEventArgs e)
{
IntPtr Result;
IntPtr SendOk;
Win32.COPYDATASTRUCT CopyData;
string[] Args;
IntPtr CopyDataMem;
bool AllowMultipleInstances = false;
Args = Environment.GetCommandLineArgs();
// TODO: Replace {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000} with your application's GUID
MessageId = Win32.RegisterWindowMessage("{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}");
SingleMutex = new Mutex(false, "AppName");
if ((AllowMultipleInstances) || (!AllowMultipleInstances && SingleMutex.WaitOne(1, true)))
{
new Main();
}
else if (Args.Length > 1)
{
foreach (Process Proc in Process.GetProcesses())
{
SendOk = Win32.SendMessageTimeout(Proc.MainWindowHandle, MessageId, IntPtr.Zero, IntPtr.Zero,
Win32.SendMessageTimeoutFlags.SMTO_BLOCK | Win32.SendMessageTimeoutFlags.SMTO_ABORTIFHUNG,
2000, out Result);
if (SendOk == IntPtr.Zero)
continue;
if ((uint)Result != MessageId)
continue;
CopyDataMem = Marshal.AllocHGlobal(Marshal.SizeOf(typeof(Win32.COPYDATASTRUCT)));
CopyData.dwData = IntPtr.Zero;
CopyData.cbData = Args[1].Length*2;
CopyData.lpData = Marshal.StringToHGlobalUni(Args[1]);
Marshal.StructureToPtr(CopyData, CopyDataMem, false);
Win32.SendMessageTimeout(Proc.MainWindowHandle, Win32.WM_COPYDATA, IntPtr.Zero, CopyDataMem,
Win32.SendMessageTimeoutFlags.SMTO_BLOCK | Win32.SendMessageTimeoutFlags.SMTO_ABORTIFHUNG,
5000, out Result);
Marshal.FreeHGlobal(CopyData.lpData);
Marshal.FreeHGlobal(CopyDataMem);
}
Shutdown(0);
}
}
}
public partial class Main : Window
{
private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
HwndSource Source;
Source = HwndSource.FromHwnd(new WindowInteropHelper(this).Handle);
Source.AddHook(new HwndSourceHook(Window_Proc));
}
private IntPtr Window_Proc(IntPtr hWnd, int Msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam, ref bool Handled)
{
Win32.COPYDATASTRUCT CopyData;
string Path;
if (Msg == Win32.WM_COPYDATA)
{
CopyData = (Win32.COPYDATASTRUCT)Marshal.PtrToStructure(lParam, typeof(Win32.COPYDATASTRUCT));
Path = Marshal.PtrToStringUni(CopyData.lpData, CopyData.cbData / 2);
if (WindowState == WindowState.Minimized)
{
// Restore window from tray
}
// Do whatever we want with information
Activate();
Focus();
}
if (Msg == App.MessageId)
{
Handled = true;
return new IntPtr(App.MessageId);
}
return IntPtr.Zero;
}
}
public class Win32
{
public const uint WM_COPYDATA = 0x004A;
public struct COPYDATASTRUCT
{
public IntPtr dwData;
public int cbData;
public IntPtr lpData;
}
[Flags]
public enum SendMessageTimeoutFlags : uint
{
SMTO_NORMAL = 0x0000,
SMTO_BLOCK = 0x0001,
SMTO_ABORTIFHUNG = 0x0002,
SMTO_NOTIMEOUTIFNOTHUNG = 0x0008
}
[DllImport("user32.dll", SetLastError=true, CharSet=CharSet.Auto)]
public static extern uint RegisterWindowMessage(string lpString);
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
public static extern IntPtr SendMessageTimeout(
IntPtr hWnd, uint Msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam,
SendMessageTimeoutFlags fuFlags, uint uTimeout, out IntPtr lpdwResult);
}
更新2017-01-25。在尝试了一些东西之后,我决定使用VisualBasic.dll,它更容易,工作效果更好(至少对我来说)。我让我之前的答案只是作为参考…
只是作为参考,这是我如何不传递参数(我找不到任何理由这样做…我指的是带有参数的单个应用程序,这些参数可以从一个实例传递到另一个实例)。 如果需要文件关联,那么应用程序应该(根据用户的标准期望)为每个文档实例化。如果你必须传递args到现有的应用程序,我想我会使用vb dll。
不传递参数(只是单实例应用程序),我更喜欢不注册一个新的窗口消息,不覆盖Matt Davis解决方案中定义的消息循环。虽然添加一个VisualBasic dll不是一个大问题,但我不喜欢添加一个新的引用只是做单个实例应用程序。此外,我更喜欢用Main实例化一个新类,而不是调用Shutdown from app. startup重写以确保尽快退出。
希望大家都喜欢……或者会启发一点:-)
项目启动类应该设置为“SingleInstanceApp”。
public class SingleInstanceApp
{
[STAThread]
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
Mutex _mutexSingleInstance = new Mutex(true, "MonitorMeSingleInstance");
if (_mutexSingleInstance.WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true))
{
try
{
var app = new App();
app.InitializeComponent();
app.Run();
}
finally
{
_mutexSingleInstance.ReleaseMutex();
_mutexSingleInstance.Close();
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("One instance is already running.");
var processes = Process.GetProcessesByName(Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().GetName().Name);
{
if (processes.Length > 1)
{
foreach (var process in processes)
{
if (process.Id != Process.GetCurrentProcess().Id)
{
WindowHelper.SetForegroundWindow(process.MainWindowHandle);
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
WindowHelper:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Interop;
using System.Windows.Threading;
namespace HQ.Util.Unmanaged
{
public class WindowHelper
{
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)]
public static extern bool SetForegroundWindow(IntPtr hWnd);
您还可以使用CodeFluent Runtime,这是一组免费的工具。它提供了一个SingleInstance类来实现单个实例应用程序。
我在这里找不到一个简单的解决方案,所以我希望有人会喜欢这个:
更新2018-09-20
把这段代码放在Program.cs中:
using System.Diagnostics;
static void Main()
{
Process thisProcess = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
Process[] allProcesses = Process.GetProcessesByName(thisProcess.ProcessName);
if (allProcesses.Length > 1)
{
// Don't put a MessageBox in here because the user could spam this MessageBox.
return;
}
// Optional code. If you don't want that someone runs your ".exe" with a different name:
string exeName = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName;
// in debug mode, don't forget that you don't use your normal .exe name.
// Debug uses the .vshost.exe.
if (exeName != "the name of your executable.exe")
{
// You can add a MessageBox here if you want.
// To point out to users that the name got changed and maybe what the name should be or something like that^^
MessageBox.Show("The executable name should be \"the name of your executable.exe\"",
"Wrong executable name", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);
return;
}
// Following code is default code:
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new MainForm());
}