在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
当前回答
下面是我使用的一个轻量级解决方案,它允许应用程序将一个已经存在的窗口带到前台,而无需求助于自定义窗口消息或盲目地搜索进程名。
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
static extern bool SetForegroundWindow(IntPtr hWnd);
static readonly string guid = "<Application Guid>";
static void Main()
{
Mutex mutex = null;
if (!CreateMutex(out mutex))
return;
// Application startup code.
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable(guid, null, EnvironmentVariableTarget.User);
}
static bool CreateMutex(out Mutex mutex)
{
bool createdNew = false;
mutex = new Mutex(false, guid, out createdNew);
if (createdNew)
{
Process process = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
string value = process.Id.ToString();
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable(guid, value, EnvironmentVariableTarget.User);
}
else
{
string value = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable(guid, EnvironmentVariableTarget.User);
Process process = null;
int processId = -1;
if (int.TryParse(value, out processId))
process = Process.GetProcessById(processId);
if (process == null || !SetForegroundWindow(process.MainWindowHandle))
MessageBox.Show("Unable to start application. An instance of this application is already running.");
}
return createdNew;
}
编辑:你也可以静态地存储和初始化互斥量和createdNew,但是一旦你完成了它,你需要显式地释放/释放互斥量。就我个人而言,我更喜欢将互斥锁保持在本地,因为即使应用程序在未到达Main结束时就关闭,它也会被自动销毁。
其他回答
请看下面的代码。它是防止一个WPF应用程序有多个实例的一个很好的简单解决方案。
private void Application_Startup(object sender, StartupEventArgs e)
{
Process thisProc = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
if (Process.GetProcessesByName(thisProc.ProcessName).Length > 1)
{
MessageBox.Show("Application running");
Application.Current.Shutdown();
return;
}
var wLogin = new LoginWindow();
if (wLogin.ShowDialog() == true)
{
var wMain = new Main();
wMain.WindowState = WindowState.Maximized;
wMain.Show();
}
else
{
Application.Current.Shutdown();
}
}
这是通过事件实现的相同的事情。
public enum ApplicationSingleInstanceMode
{
CurrentUserSession,
AllSessionsOfCurrentUser,
Pc
}
public class ApplicationSingleInstancePerUser: IDisposable
{
private readonly EventWaitHandle _event;
/// <summary>
/// Shows if the current instance of ghost is the first
/// </summary>
public bool FirstInstance { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// Initializes
/// </summary>
/// <param name="applicationName">The application name</param>
/// <param name="mode">The single mode</param>
public ApplicationSingleInstancePerUser(string applicationName, ApplicationSingleInstanceMode mode = ApplicationSingleInstanceMode.CurrentUserSession)
{
string name;
if (mode == ApplicationSingleInstanceMode.CurrentUserSession)
name = $"Local\\{applicationName}";
else if (mode == ApplicationSingleInstanceMode.AllSessionsOfCurrentUser)
name = $"Global\\{applicationName}{Environment.UserDomainName}";
else
name = $"Global\\{applicationName}";
try
{
bool created;
_event = new EventWaitHandle(false, EventResetMode.ManualReset, name, out created);
FirstInstance = created;
}
catch
{
}
}
public void Dispose()
{
_event.Dispose();
}
}
一个新的使用互斥和IPC的东西,也传递任何命令行参数到运行的实例,是WPF单实例应用程序。
基于Matt Davis的答案,为方便起见包装成一个类。
public static class SingleAppInstanceChecker
{
/// <summary>
/// Arbitrary unique string
/// </summary>
private static Mutex _mutex = new Mutex(true, "0d12ad74-026f-40c3-bdae-e178ddee8602");
public static bool IsNotRunning()
{
return _mutex.WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true);
}
}
使用示例:
private void Application_Startup(object sender, StartupEventArgs e)
{
if (!SingleAppInstanceChecker.IsNotRunning())
{
MessageBox.Show("Application is already running.");
// Exit application using:
// Environment.Exit(1);
// Application.Current.Shutdown();
// Etc...
return;
}
// Allow startup and continue with normal processing
// ...
}
这么简单的问题有这么多答案。稍微改变一下这里是我对这个问题的解决方案。
Creating a Mutex can be troublesome because the JIT-er only sees you using it for a small portion of your code and wants to mark it as ready for garbage collection. It pretty much wants to out-smart you thinking you are not going to be using that Mutex for that long. In reality you want to hang onto this Mutex for as long as your application is running. The best way to tell the garbage collector to leave you Mutex alone is to tell it to keep it alive though out the different generations of garage collection. Example:
var m = new Mutex(...);
...
GC.KeepAlive(m);
我从这个网页上获得了灵感:http://www.ai.uga.edu/~mc/SingleInstance.html