在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
当前回答
你可以使用Mutex类,但是你很快就会发现你需要自己实现传递参数的代码。当我读Chris Sell的书时,我学到了一个用WinForms编程的技巧。这个技巧使用了框架中已经可用的逻辑。我不知道你怎么想,但当我了解到可以在框架中重用的东西时,这通常是我采取的路线,而不是重新发明轮子。当然,除非它不能做到我想要的一切。
当我进入WPF时,我想到了一种使用相同代码的方法,但在WPF应用程序中。基于您的问题,这个解决方案应该能够满足您的需求。
首先,我们需要创建应用程序类。在这个类中,我们将重写OnStartup事件并创建一个名为Activate的方法,该方法将在稍后使用。
public class SingleInstanceApplication : System.Windows.Application
{
protected override void OnStartup(System.Windows.StartupEventArgs e)
{
// Call the OnStartup event on our base class
base.OnStartup(e);
// Create our MainWindow and show it
MainWindow window = new MainWindow();
window.Show();
}
public void Activate()
{
// Reactivate the main window
MainWindow.Activate();
}
}
Second, we will need to create a class that can manage our instances. Before we go through that, we are actually going to reuse some code that is in the Microsoft.VisualBasic assembly. Since, I am using C# in this example, I had to make a reference to the assembly. If you are using VB.NET, you don't have to do anything. The class we are going to use is WindowsFormsApplicationBase and inherit our instance manager off of it and then leverage properties and events to handle the single instancing.
public class SingleInstanceManager : Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.WindowsFormsApplicationBase
{
private SingleInstanceApplication _application;
private System.Collections.ObjectModel.ReadOnlyCollection<string> _commandLine;
public SingleInstanceManager()
{
IsSingleInstance = true;
}
protected override bool OnStartup(Microsoft.VisualBasic.ApplicationServices.StartupEventArgs eventArgs)
{
// First time _application is launched
_commandLine = eventArgs.CommandLine;
_application = new SingleInstanceApplication();
_application.Run();
return false;
}
protected override void OnStartupNextInstance(StartupNextInstanceEventArgs eventArgs)
{
// Subsequent launches
base.OnStartupNextInstance(eventArgs);
_commandLine = eventArgs.CommandLine;
_application.Activate();
}
}
基本上,我们使用VB位来检测单个实例并进行相应的处理。OnStartup将在第一个实例加载时被触发。当应用程序再次运行时,OnStartupNextInstance被触发。如您所见,我可以通过事件参数获得在命令行上传递的内容。我将值设置为一个实例字段。您可以在这里解析命令行,也可以通过构造函数和对Activate方法的调用将它传递给应用程序。
第三,是时候创建我们的入口点了。我们将利用SingleInstanceManager,而不是像通常那样更新应用程序。
public class EntryPoint
{
[STAThread]
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
SingleInstanceManager manager = new SingleInstanceManager();
manager.Run(args);
}
}
好吧,我希望您能够理解所有内容,能够使用这个实现并使其成为您自己的实现。
其他回答
这里有一个解决方案:
Protected Overrides Sub OnStartup(e As StartupEventArgs)
Const appName As String = "TestApp"
Dim createdNew As Boolean
_mutex = New Mutex(True, appName, createdNew)
If Not createdNew Then
'app is already running! Exiting the application
MessageBox.Show("Application is already running.")
Application.Current.Shutdown()
End If
MyBase.OnStartup(e)
End Sub
简单地使用一个StreamWriter,怎么样?
System.IO.File.StreamWriter OpenFlag = null; //globally
and
try
{
OpenFlag = new StreamWriter(Path.GetTempPath() + "OpenedIfRunning");
}
catch (System.IO.IOException) //file in use
{
Environment.Exit(0);
}
这是一篇关于互斥锁解决方案的很好的文章。本文描述的方法有两个优点。
首先,它不需要依赖于Microsoft。VisualBasic组装。如果我的项目已经依赖于该程序集,我可能会建议使用另一个答案中显示的方法。但事实上,我不使用微软。VisualBasic程序集,我宁愿不向项目添加不必要的依赖项。
其次,本文将展示当用户试图启动另一个实例时,如何将应用程序的现有实例显示到前台。这是这里描述的其他互斥锁解决方案没有解决的问题。
更新
截至2014年8月1日,我上面链接的文章仍然活跃,但博客已经有一段时间没有更新了。这让我担心,它最终可能会消失,随之而来的是所倡导的解决方案。我在这里复制这篇文章的内容以供后人参考。这些文字仅属于Sanity Free Coding的博客所有者。
Today I wanted to refactor some code that prohibited my application from running multiple instances of itself. Previously I had use System.Diagnostics.Process to search for an instance of my myapp.exe in the process list. While this works, it brings on a lot of overhead, and I wanted something cleaner. Knowing that I could use a mutex for this (but never having done it before) I set out to cut down my code and simplify my life. In the class of my application main I created a static named Mutex:
static class Program
{
static Mutex mutex = new Mutex(true, "{8F6F0AC4-B9A1-45fd-A8CF-72F04E6BDE8F}");
[STAThread]
...
}
Having a named mutex allows us to stack synchronization across multiple threads and processes which is just the magic I'm looking for. Mutex.WaitOne has an overload that specifies an amount of time for us to wait. Since we're not actually wanting to synchronizing our code (more just check if it is currently in use) we use the overload with two parameters: Mutex.WaitOne(Timespan timeout, bool exitContext). Wait one returns true if it is able to enter, and false if it wasn't. In this case, we don't want to wait at all; If our mutex is being used, skip it, and move on, so we pass in TimeSpan.Zero (wait 0 milliseconds), and set the exitContext to true so we can exit the synchronization context before we try to aquire a lock on it. Using this, we wrap our Application.Run code inside something like this:
static class Program
{
static Mutex mutex = new Mutex(true, "{8F6F0AC4-B9A1-45fd-A8CF-72F04E6BDE8F}");
[STAThread]
static void Main() {
if(mutex.WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true)) {
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new Form1());
mutex.ReleaseMutex();
} else {
MessageBox.Show("only one instance at a time");
}
}
}
So, if our app is running, WaitOne will return false, and we'll get a message box. Instead of showing a message box, I opted to utilize a little Win32 to notify my running instance that someone forgot that it was already running (by bringing itself to the top of all the other windows). To achieve this I used PostMessage to broadcast a custom message to every window (the custom message was registered with RegisterWindowMessage by my running application, which means only my application knows what it is) then my second instance exits. The running application instance would receive that notification and process it. In order to do that, I overrode WndProc in my main form and listened for my custom notification. When I received that notification I set the form's TopMost property to true to bring it up on top. Here is what I ended up with: Program.cs
static class Program
{
static Mutex mutex = new Mutex(true, "{8F6F0AC4-B9A1-45fd-A8CF-72F04E6BDE8F}");
[STAThread]
static void Main() {
if(mutex.WaitOne(TimeSpan.Zero, true)) {
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new Form1());
mutex.ReleaseMutex();
} else {
// send our Win32 message to make the currently running instance
// jump on top of all the other windows
NativeMethods.PostMessage(
(IntPtr)NativeMethods.HWND_BROADCAST,
NativeMethods.WM_SHOWME,
IntPtr.Zero,
IntPtr.Zero);
}
}
}
NativeMethods.cs
// this class just wraps some Win32 stuff that we're going to use
internal class NativeMethods
{
public const int HWND_BROADCAST = 0xffff;
public static readonly int WM_SHOWME = RegisterWindowMessage("WM_SHOWME");
[DllImport("user32")]
public static extern bool PostMessage(IntPtr hwnd, int msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam);
[DllImport("user32")]
public static extern int RegisterWindowMessage(string message);
}
Form1.cs(正面部分)
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
protected override void WndProc(ref Message m)
{
if(m.Msg == NativeMethods.WM_SHOWME) {
ShowMe();
}
base.WndProc(ref m);
}
private void ShowMe()
{
if(WindowState == FormWindowState.Minimized) {
WindowState = FormWindowState.Normal;
}
// get our current "TopMost" value (ours will always be false though)
bool top = TopMost;
// make our form jump to the top of everything
TopMost = true;
// set it back to whatever it was
TopMost = top;
}
}
永远不要使用命名互斥来实现单实例应用程序(至少在生产代码中不要这样做)。恶意代码可以很容易地DoS(拒绝服务)你的屁股…
[我在下面提供了控制台和wpf应用程序的示例代码。]
在创建命名的Mutex实例后,只需检查createdNew变量的值(示例如下!)。
布尔值createdNew将返回false:
如果命名为“YourApplicationNameHere”的互斥锁实例已经存在 在系统某处创建
布尔值createdNew将返回true:
如果这是第一个名为“YourApplicationNameHere”的互斥锁 系统。
控制台应用程序-示例:
static Mutex m = null;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
const string mutexName = "YourApplicationNameHere";
bool createdNew = false;
try
{
// Initializes a new instance of the Mutex class with a Boolean value that indicates
// whether the calling thread should have initial ownership of the mutex, a string that is the name of the mutex,
// and a Boolean value that, when the method returns, indicates whether the calling thread was granted initial ownership of the mutex.
using (m = new Mutex(true, mutexName, out createdNew))
{
if (!createdNew)
{
Console.WriteLine("instance is alreday running... shutting down !!!");
Console.Read();
return; // Exit the application
}
// Run your windows forms app here
Console.WriteLine("Single instance app is running!");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
WPF-Example:
public partial class App : Application
{
static Mutex m = null;
protected override void OnStartup(StartupEventArgs e)
{
const string mutexName = "YourApplicationNameHere";
bool createdNew = false;
try
{
// Initializes a new instance of the Mutex class with a Boolean value that indicates
// whether the calling thread should have initial ownership of the mutex, a string that is the name of the mutex,
// and a Boolean value that, when the method returns, indicates whether the calling thread was granted initial ownership of the mutex.
m = new Mutex(true, mutexName, out createdNew);
if (!createdNew)
{
Current.Shutdown(); // Exit the application
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
base.OnStartup(e);
}
protected override void OnExit(ExitEventArgs e)
{
if (m != null)
{
m.Dispose();
}
base.OnExit(e);
}
}