在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
在。net下使用c#和WPF(而不是Windows窗体或控制台),创建一个只能作为单个实例运行的应用程序的正确方法是什么?
我知道它与某种叫做互斥的神秘事物有关,我很少能找到有人费心停下来解释其中一个是什么。
代码还需要通知已经运行的实例,用户试图启动第二个实例,如果存在命令行参数,还可能传递任何命令行参数。
当前回答
永远不要使用命名互斥来实现单实例应用程序(至少在生产代码中不要这样做)。恶意代码可以很容易地DoS(拒绝服务)你的屁股…
其他回答
永远不要使用命名互斥来实现单实例应用程序(至少在生产代码中不要这样做)。恶意代码可以很容易地DoS(拒绝服务)你的屁股…
MSDN实际上有一个c#和VB的示例应用程序可以做到这一点:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms771662(v=VS.90).aspx
The most common and reliable technique for developing single-instance detection is to use the Microsoft .NET Framework remoting infrastructure (System.Remoting). The Microsoft .NET Framework (version 2.0) includes a type, WindowsFormsApplicationBase, which encapsulates the required remoting functionality. To incorporate this type into a WPF application, a type needs to derive from it, and be used as a shim between the application static entry point method, Main, and the WPF application's Application type. The shim detects when an application is first launched, and when subsequent launches are attempted, and yields control the WPF Application type to determine how to process the launches.
For C# people just take a deep breath and forget about the whole 'I don't wanna include VisualBasic DLL'. Because of this and what Scott Hanselman says and the fact that this pretty much is the cleanest solution to the problem and is designed by people who know a lot more about the framework than you do. From a usability standpoint the fact is if your user is loading an application and it is already open and you're giving them an error message like 'Another instance of the app is running. Bye' then they're not gonna be a very happy user. You simply MUST (in a GUI application) switch to that application and pass in the arguments provided - or if command line parameters have no meaning then you must pop up the application which may have been minimized.
这个框架已经支持这个功能了——只是有些白痴把DLL命名为Microsoft罢了。VisualBasic,它没有被放到微软。ApplicationUtils之类的。克服它——或者打开Reflector。
提示:如果你完全按原样使用这种方法,并且你已经有了一个带有资源等的App.xaml,你也会想要看看这个。
好吧,我有一个一次性的类,对于大多数用例来说很容易:
像这样使用它:
static void Main()
{
using (SingleInstanceMutex sim = new SingleInstanceMutex())
{
if (sim.IsOtherInstanceRunning)
{
Application.Exit();
}
// Initialize program here.
}
}
下面就是:
/// <summary>
/// Represents a <see cref="SingleInstanceMutex"/> class.
/// </summary>
public partial class SingleInstanceMutex : IDisposable
{
#region Fields
/// <summary>
/// Indicator whether another instance of this application is running or not.
/// </summary>
private bool isNoOtherInstanceRunning;
/// <summary>
/// The <see cref="Mutex"/> used to ask for other instances of this application.
/// </summary>
private Mutex singleInstanceMutex = null;
/// <summary>
/// An indicator whether this object is beeing actively disposed or not.
/// </summary>
private bool disposed;
#endregion
#region Constructor
/// <summary>
/// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SingleInstanceMutex"/> class.
/// </summary>
public SingleInstanceMutex()
{
this.singleInstanceMutex = new Mutex(true, Assembly.GetCallingAssembly().FullName, out this.isNoOtherInstanceRunning);
}
#endregion
#region Properties
/// <summary>
/// Gets an indicator whether another instance of the application is running or not.
/// </summary>
public bool IsOtherInstanceRunning
{
get
{
return !this.isNoOtherInstanceRunning;
}
}
#endregion
#region Methods
/// <summary>
/// Closes the <see cref="SingleInstanceMutex"/>.
/// </summary>
public void Close()
{
this.ThrowIfDisposed();
this.singleInstanceMutex.Close();
}
public void Dispose()
{
this.Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
private void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (!this.disposed)
{
/* Release unmanaged ressources */
if (disposing)
{
/* Release managed ressources */
this.Close();
}
this.disposed = true;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Throws an exception if something is tried to be done with an already disposed object.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// All public methods of the class must first call this.
/// </remarks>
public void ThrowIfDisposed()
{
if (this.disposed)
{
throw new ObjectDisposedException(this.GetType().Name);
}
}
#endregion
}
下面是我使用的一个轻量级解决方案,它允许应用程序将一个已经存在的窗口带到前台,而无需求助于自定义窗口消息或盲目地搜索进程名。
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
static extern bool SetForegroundWindow(IntPtr hWnd);
static readonly string guid = "<Application Guid>";
static void Main()
{
Mutex mutex = null;
if (!CreateMutex(out mutex))
return;
// Application startup code.
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable(guid, null, EnvironmentVariableTarget.User);
}
static bool CreateMutex(out Mutex mutex)
{
bool createdNew = false;
mutex = new Mutex(false, guid, out createdNew);
if (createdNew)
{
Process process = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
string value = process.Id.ToString();
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable(guid, value, EnvironmentVariableTarget.User);
}
else
{
string value = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable(guid, EnvironmentVariableTarget.User);
Process process = null;
int processId = -1;
if (int.TryParse(value, out processId))
process = Process.GetProcessById(processId);
if (process == null || !SetForegroundWindow(process.MainWindowHandle))
MessageBox.Show("Unable to start application. An instance of this application is already running.");
}
return createdNew;
}
编辑:你也可以静态地存储和初始化互斥量和createdNew,但是一旦你完成了它,你需要显式地释放/释放互斥量。就我个人而言,我更喜欢将互斥锁保持在本地,因为即使应用程序在未到达Main结束时就关闭,它也会被自动销毁。
我在这里找不到一个简单的解决方案,所以我希望有人会喜欢这个:
更新2018-09-20
把这段代码放在Program.cs中:
using System.Diagnostics;
static void Main()
{
Process thisProcess = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
Process[] allProcesses = Process.GetProcessesByName(thisProcess.ProcessName);
if (allProcesses.Length > 1)
{
// Don't put a MessageBox in here because the user could spam this MessageBox.
return;
}
// Optional code. If you don't want that someone runs your ".exe" with a different name:
string exeName = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName;
// in debug mode, don't forget that you don't use your normal .exe name.
// Debug uses the .vshost.exe.
if (exeName != "the name of your executable.exe")
{
// You can add a MessageBox here if you want.
// To point out to users that the name got changed and maybe what the name should be or something like that^^
MessageBox.Show("The executable name should be \"the name of your executable.exe\"",
"Wrong executable name", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Error);
return;
}
// Following code is default code:
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new MainForm());
}