这段代码应该转到main方法。关于WPF中main方法的更多信息，请参阅这里。

[DllImport("user32.dll")]
private static extern Boolean ShowWindow(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 nCmdShow);

private const int SW_SHOWMAXIMIZED = 3;

static void Main() 
{
    Process currentProcess = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
    var runningProcess = (from process in Process.GetProcesses()
                          where
                            process.Id != currentProcess.Id &&
                            process.ProcessName.Equals(
                              currentProcess.ProcessName,
                              StringComparison.Ordinal)
                          select process).FirstOrDefault();
    if (runningProcess != null)
    {
        ShowWindow(runningProcess.MainWindowHandle, SW_SHOWMAXIMIZED);
       return; 
    }
}

方法2

static void Main()
{
    string procName = Process.GetCurrentProcess().ProcessName;
    // get the list of all processes by that name

    Process[] processes=Process.GetProcessesByName(procName);

    if (processes.Length > 1)
    {
        MessageBox.Show(procName + " already running");  
        return;
    } 
    else
    {
        // Application.Run(...);
    }
}

注意:上述方法假设您的进程/应用程序有唯一的名称。因为它使用进程名来查找是否有现有的处理器。所以，如果你的应用程序有一个非常普通的名字(如:记事本)，上述方法是行不通的。

请看下面的代码。它是防止一个WPF应用程序有多个实例的一个很好的简单解决方案。

private void Application_Startup(object sender, StartupEventArgs e)
{
    Process thisProc = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
    if (Process.GetProcessesByName(thisProc.ProcessName).Length > 1)
    {
        MessageBox.Show("Application running");
        Application.Current.Shutdown();
        return;
    }

    var wLogin = new LoginWindow();

    if (wLogin.ShowDialog() == true)
    {
        var wMain = new Main();
        wMain.WindowState = WindowState.Maximized;
        wMain.Show();
    }
    else
    {
        Application.Current.Shutdown();
    }
}

好吧，我有一个一次性的类，对于大多数用例来说很容易:

像这样使用它:

static void Main()
{
    using (SingleInstanceMutex sim = new SingleInstanceMutex())
    {
        if (sim.IsOtherInstanceRunning)
        {
            Application.Exit();
        }

        // Initialize program here.
    }
}

下面就是:

/// <summary>
/// Represents a <see cref="SingleInstanceMutex"/> class.
/// </summary>
public partial class SingleInstanceMutex : IDisposable
{
    #region Fields

    /// <summary>
    /// Indicator whether another instance of this application is running or not.
    /// </summary>
    private bool isNoOtherInstanceRunning;

    /// <summary>
    /// The <see cref="Mutex"/> used to ask for other instances of this application.
    /// </summary>
    private Mutex singleInstanceMutex = null;

    /// <summary>
    /// An indicator whether this object is beeing actively disposed or not.
    /// </summary>
    private bool disposed;

    #endregion

    #region Constructor

    /// <summary>
    /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SingleInstanceMutex"/> class.
    /// </summary>
    public SingleInstanceMutex()
    {
        this.singleInstanceMutex = new Mutex(true, Assembly.GetCallingAssembly().FullName, out this.isNoOtherInstanceRunning);
    }

    #endregion

    #region Properties

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets an indicator whether another instance of the application is running or not.
    /// </summary>
    public bool IsOtherInstanceRunning
    {
        get
        {
            return !this.isNoOtherInstanceRunning;
        }
    }

    #endregion

    #region Methods

    /// <summary>
    /// Closes the <see cref="SingleInstanceMutex"/>.
    /// </summary>
    public void Close()
    {
        this.ThrowIfDisposed();
        this.singleInstanceMutex.Close();
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        this.Dispose(true);
        GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
    }

    private void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if (!this.disposed)
        {
            /* Release unmanaged ressources */

            if (disposing)
            {
                /* Release managed ressources */
                this.Close();
            }

            this.disposed = true;
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Throws an exception if something is tried to be done with an already disposed object.
    /// </summary>
    /// <remarks>
    /// All public methods of the class must first call this.
    /// </remarks>
    public void ThrowIfDisposed()
    {
        if (this.disposed)
        {
            throw new ObjectDisposedException(this.GetType().Name);
        }
    }

    #endregion
}

请检查这里提出的解决方案，它使用信号量来确定现有实例是否已经在运行，适用于WPF应用程序，并且可以通过使用TcpListener和TcpClient将参数从第二个实例传递给第一个已经运行的实例:

它不仅适用于。net Framework，也适用于。net Core。

我最喜欢的解决方案来自MVP丹尼尔·沃恩: 强制执行单实例Wpf应用程序

它使用MemoryMappedFile将命令行参数发送给第一个实例:

/// <summary>
/// This class allows restricting the number of executables in execution, to one.
/// </summary>
public sealed class SingletonApplicationEnforcer
{
    readonly Action<IEnumerable<string>> processArgsFunc;
    readonly string applicationId;
    Thread thread;
    string argDelimiter = "_;;_";

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets or sets the string that is used to join 
    /// the string array of arguments in memory.
    /// </summary>
    /// <value>The arg delimeter.</value>
    public string ArgDelimeter
    {
        get
        {
            return argDelimiter;
        }
        set
        {
            argDelimiter = value;
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="SingletonApplicationEnforcer"/> class.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="processArgsFunc">A handler for processing command line args 
    /// when they are received from another application instance.</param>
    /// <param name="applicationId">The application id used 
    /// for naming the <seealso cref="EventWaitHandle"/>.</param>
    public SingletonApplicationEnforcer(Action<IEnumerable<string>> processArgsFunc, 
        string applicationId = "DisciplesRock")
    {
        if (processArgsFunc == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("processArgsFunc");
        }
        this.processArgsFunc = processArgsFunc;
        this.applicationId = applicationId;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Determines if this application instance is not the singleton instance.
    /// If this application is not the singleton, then it should exit.
    /// </summary>
    /// <returns><c>true</c> if the application should shutdown, 
    /// otherwise <c>false</c>.</returns>
    public bool ShouldApplicationExit()
    {
        bool createdNew;
        string argsWaitHandleName = "ArgsWaitHandle_" + applicationId;
        string memoryFileName = "ArgFile_" + applicationId;

        EventWaitHandle argsWaitHandle = new EventWaitHandle(
            false, EventResetMode.AutoReset, argsWaitHandleName, out createdNew);

        GC.KeepAlive(argsWaitHandle);

        if (createdNew)
        {
            /* This is the main, or singleton application. 
                * A thread is created to service the MemoryMappedFile. 
                * We repeatedly examine this file each time the argsWaitHandle 
                * is Set by a non-singleton application instance. */
            thread = new Thread(() =>
                {
                    try
                    {
                        using (MemoryMappedFile file = MemoryMappedFile.CreateOrOpen(memoryFileName, 10000))
                        {
                            while (true)
                            {
                                argsWaitHandle.WaitOne();
                                using (MemoryMappedViewStream stream = file.CreateViewStream())
                                {
                                    var reader = new BinaryReader(stream);
                                    string args;
                                    try
                                    {
                                        args = reader.ReadString();
                                    }
                                    catch (Exception ex)
                                    {
                                        Debug.WriteLine("Unable to retrieve string. " + ex);
                                        continue;
                                    }
                                    string[] argsSplit = args.Split(new string[] { argDelimiter }, 
                                                                    StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
                                    processArgsFunc(argsSplit);
                                }

                            }
                        }
                    }
                    catch (Exception ex)
                    {
                        Debug.WriteLine("Unable to monitor memory file. " + ex);
                    }
                });

            thread.IsBackground = true;
            thread.Start();
        }
        else
        {
            /* Non singleton application instance. 
                * Should exit, after passing command line args to singleton process, 
                * via the MemoryMappedFile. */
            using (MemoryMappedFile mmf = MemoryMappedFile.OpenExisting(memoryFileName))
            {
                using (MemoryMappedViewStream stream = mmf.CreateViewStream())
                {
                    var writer = new BinaryWriter(stream);
                    string[] args = Environment.GetCommandLineArgs();
                    string joined = string.Join(argDelimiter, args);
                    writer.Write(joined);
                }
            }
            argsWaitHandle.Set();
        }

        return !createdNew;
    }
}

Just some thoughts: There are cases when requiring that only one instance of an application is not "lame" as some would have you believe. Database apps, etc. are an order of magnitude more difficult if one allows multiple instances of the app for a single user to access a database (you know, all that updating all the records that are open in multiple instances of the app on the users machine, etc.). First, for the "name collision thing, don't use a human readable name - use a GUID instead or, even better a GUID + the human readable name. Chances of name collision just dropped off the radar and the Mutex doesn't care. As someone pointed out, a DOS attack would suck, but if the malicious person has gone to the trouble of getting the mutex name and incorporating it into their app, you are pretty much a target anyway and will have to do MUCH more to protect yourself than just fiddle a mutex name. Also, if one uses the variant of: new Mutex(true, "some GUID plus Name", out AIsFirstInstance), you already have your indicator as to whether or not the Mutex is the first instance.