我的结构如下所示:

Component 1

 - |- Component 2


 - - |- Component 4


 - - -  |- Component 5

Component 3

组件3应该根据组件5的状态显示一些数据。

因为道具是不可变的,我不能简单地在组件1中保存它的状态并转发它,对吗?是的,我读过Redux,但我不想使用它。我希望只用react就能解决这个问题。我错了吗?


当前回答

在React中,数据不能从子节点传递到父节点。数据必须从父节点传递给子节点。在这种情况下,您可以使用内置的Context API或第三方状态管理解决方案,如Redux、Mobx或Apollo GraphQL。然而,如果你的应用程序结构太小,你可以将数据存储在你的父元素中,然后通过prop drilling将其发送给你的子元素。但如果你的项目比较大,就会很混乱。

其他回答

对于子-父通信,您应该传递一个函数来设置从父到子的状态,如下所示


class Parent extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    this.handler = this.handler.bind(this)
  }

  handler() {
    this.setState({
      someVar: 'some value'
    })
  }

  render() {
    return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
  }
}

class Child extends React.Component {
  render() {
    return <Button onClick = {this.props.handler}/ >
  }
}

这样,子进程就可以通过调用带有props的函数来更新父进程的状态。

但是你必须重新考虑组件的结构,因为根据我的理解,组件5和组件3是不相关的。

一种可能的解决方案是将它们包装在一个更高级别的组件中,该组件将同时包含组件1和组件3的状态。该组件将通过props设置较低级别的状态。

我找到了以下工作解决方案,将onClick函数参数从子组件传递给带有参数的父组件:

父类:

class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
    super(props)

    // Bind the this context to the handler function
    this.handler = this.handler.bind(this);

    // Set some state
    this.state = {
        messageShown: false
    };
}

// This method will be sent to the child component
handler(param1) {
console.log(param1);
    this.setState({
        messageShown: true
    });
}

// Render the child component and set the action property with the handler as value
render() {
    return <Child action={this.handler} />
}}

子类:

class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
    return (
        <div>
            {/* The button will execute the handler function set by the parent component */}
            <Button onClick={this.props.action.bind(this,param1)} />
        </div>
    )
} }

我喜欢关于传递函数的答案。这是一个非常方便的技巧。

On the flip side you can also achieve this using pub/sub or using a variant, a dispatcher, as Flux does. The theory is super simple. Have component 5 dispatch a message which component 3 is listening for. Component 3 then updates its state which triggers the re-render. This requires stateful components, which, depending on your viewpoint, may or may not be an anti-pattern. I'm against them personally and would rather that something else is listening for dispatches and changes state from the very top-down (Redux does this, but it adds additional terminology).

import { Dispatcher } from 'flux'
import { Component } from 'React'

const dispatcher = new Dispatcher()

// Component 3
// Some methods, such as constructor, omitted for brevity
class StatefulParent extends Component {
  state = {
    text: 'foo'
  } 

  componentDidMount() {
    dispatcher.register( dispatch => {
      if ( dispatch.type === 'change' ) {
        this.setState({ text: 'bar' })
      }
    }
  }

  render() {
    return <h1>{ this.state.text }</h1>
  }
}

// Click handler
const onClick = event => {
  dispatcher.dispatch({
    type: 'change'
  })
}

// Component 5 in your example
const StatelessChild = props => {
  return <button onClick={ onClick }>Click me</button> 
}

使用Flux的调度程序捆绑非常简单。它只是简单地注册回调,并在任何分派发生时调用它们,传递分派上的内容(在上面的简洁示例中,分派没有有效负载,只有一个消息id)。如果对您更有意义的话,您可以很容易地将其调整为传统的pub/sub(例如,从事件中使用EventEmitter或其他版本)。

<Footer 
  action={()=>this.setState({showChart: true})}
/>

<footer className="row">
    <button type="button" onClick={this.props.action}>Edit</button>
  {console.log(this.props)}
</footer>

Try this example to write inline setState, it avoids creating another function.

我是这样做的:

type ParentProps = {}
type ParentState = { someValue: number }
class Parent extends React.Component<ParentProps, ParentState> {
    constructor(props: ParentProps) {
        super(props)
        this.state = { someValue: 0 }

        this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this)
    }

    handleChange(value: number) {
        this.setState({...this.state, someValue: value})
    }

    render() {
        return <div>
            <Child changeFunction={this.handleChange} defaultValue={this.state.someValue} />
            <p>Value: {this.state.someValue}</p>
        </div>
    }
}

type ChildProps = { defaultValue: number, changeFunction: (value: number) => void}
type ChildState = { anotherValue: number }
class Child extends React.Component<ChildProps, ChildState> {
    constructor(props: ChildProps) {
        super(props)
        this.state = { anotherValue: this.props.defaultValue }

        this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this)
    }

    handleChange(value: number) {
        this.setState({...this.state, anotherValue: value})
        this.props.changeFunction(value)
    }

    render() {
        return <div>
            <input onChange={event => this.handleChange(Number(event.target.value))} type='number' value={this.state.anotherValue}/>
        </div>
    }
}