我的结构如下所示:
Component 1
- |- Component 2
- - |- Component 4
- - - |- Component 5
Component 3
组件3应该根据组件5的状态显示一些数据。
因为道具是不可变的，我不能简单地在组件1中保存它的状态并转发它，对吗?是的，我读过Redux，但我不想使用它。我希望只用react就能解决这个问题。我错了吗?
当前回答
我喜欢关于传递函数的答案。这是一个非常方便的技巧。
On the flip side you can also achieve this using pub/sub or using a variant, a dispatcher, as Flux does. The theory is super simple. Have component 5 dispatch a message which component 3 is listening for. Component 3 then updates its state which triggers the re-render. This requires stateful components, which, depending on your viewpoint, may or may not be an anti-pattern. I'm against them personally and would rather that something else is listening for dispatches and changes state from the very top-down (Redux does this, but it adds additional terminology).
import { Dispatcher } from 'flux'
import { Component } from 'React'
const dispatcher = new Dispatcher()
// Component 3
// Some methods, such as constructor, omitted for brevity
class StatefulParent extends Component {
state = {
text: 'foo'
}
componentDidMount() {
dispatcher.register( dispatch => {
if ( dispatch.type === 'change' ) {
this.setState({ text: 'bar' })
}
}
}
render() {
return <h1>{ this.state.text }</h1>
}
}
// Click handler
const onClick = event => {
dispatcher.dispatch({
type: 'change'
})
}
// Component 5 in your example
const StatelessChild = props => {
return <button onClick={ onClick }>Click me</button>
}
使用Flux的调度程序捆绑非常简单。它只是简单地注册回调，并在任何分派发生时调用它们，传递分派上的内容(在上面的简洁示例中，分派没有有效负载，只有一个消息id)。如果对您更有意义的话，您可以很容易地将其调整为传统的pub/sub(例如，从事件中使用EventEmitter或其他版本)。
其他回答
我想感谢得到最多赞的回答，因为他给了我自己的问题的想法，基本上是用箭头函数和从子组件传递参数的变化:
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
// without bind, replaced by arrow func below
}
handler = (val) => {
this.setState({
someVar: val
})
}
render() {
return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
}
}
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
return <Button onClick = {() => this.props.handler('the passing value')}/ >
}
}
希望它能帮助到别人。
之前给出的大多数答案都是针对React的。基于组件的设计。如果你在最近的React库升级中使用useState，那么遵循这个答案。
关于你的问题，我理解你需要在Component 3中显示一些基于Component 5状态的条件数据。方法:
组件3的状态将保存一个变量来检查组件5的状态是否有该数据 一个箭头函数，它将改变组件3的状态变量。 向组件5传递一个带有道具的箭头函数。 组件5有一个箭头函数，它将改变组件3的状态变量 组件5的箭头函数在加载自身时调用
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script> Class Component3 extends React.Component { state = { someData = true } checkForData = (result) => { this.setState({someData : result}) } render() { if(this.state.someData) { return( <Component5 hasData = {this.checkForData} /> //Other Data ); } else { return( //Other Data ); } } } export default Component3; class Component5 extends React.Component { state = { dataValue = "XYZ" } checkForData = () => { if(this.state.dataValue === "XYZ") { this.props.hasData(true); } else { this.props.hasData(false); } } render() { return( <div onLoad = {this.checkForData}> //Conditional Data </div> ); } } export default Component5;
似乎我们只能将数据从父组件传递给子组件，因为React促进单向数据流，但为了让父组件在“子组件”中发生某些事情时更新自己，我们通常使用所谓的“回调函数”。
我们将父类中定义的函数作为“props”传递给子类 从子进程调用该函数，在父进程中触发它 组件。
class Parent extends React.Component {
handler = (Value_Passed_From_SubChild) => {
console.log("Parent got triggered when a grandchild button was clicked");
console.log("Parent->Child->SubChild");
console.log(Value_Passed_From_SubChild);
}
render() {
return <Child handler = {this.handler} />
}
}
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
return <SubChild handler = {this.props.handler}/ >
}
}
class SubChild extends React.Component {
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.state = {
somethingImp : [1,2,3,4]
}
}
render() {
return <button onClick = {this.props.handler(this.state.somethingImp)}>Clickme<button/>
}
}
React.render(<Parent />,document.getElementById('app'));
HTML
----
<div id="app"></div>
在这个例子中，我们可以通过将函数传递给它的直接子函数来实现数据从子→子→父的传递。
我喜欢关于传递函数的答案。这是一个非常方便的技巧。
On the flip side you can also achieve this using pub/sub or using a variant, a dispatcher, as Flux does. The theory is super simple. Have component 5 dispatch a message which component 3 is listening for. Component 3 then updates its state which triggers the re-render. This requires stateful components, which, depending on your viewpoint, may or may not be an anti-pattern. I'm against them personally and would rather that something else is listening for dispatches and changes state from the very top-down (Redux does this, but it adds additional terminology).
import { Dispatcher } from 'flux'
import { Component } from 'React'
const dispatcher = new Dispatcher()
// Component 3
// Some methods, such as constructor, omitted for brevity
class StatefulParent extends Component {
state = {
text: 'foo'
}
componentDidMount() {
dispatcher.register( dispatch => {
if ( dispatch.type === 'change' ) {
this.setState({ text: 'bar' })
}
}
}
render() {
return <h1>{ this.state.text }</h1>
}
}
// Click handler
const onClick = event => {
dispatcher.dispatch({
type: 'change'
})
}
// Component 5 in your example
const StatelessChild = props => {
return <button onClick={ onClick }>Click me</button>
}
使用Flux的调度程序捆绑非常简单。它只是简单地注册回调，并在任何分派发生时调用它们，传递分派上的内容(在上面的简洁示例中，分派没有有效负载，只有一个消息id)。如果对您更有意义的话，您可以很容易地将其调整为传统的pub/sub(例如，从事件中使用EventEmitter或其他版本)。
