我有两个组成部分:
父组件 子组件
我试图从Parent调用Child的方法，我尝试了这种方式，但不能得到一个结果:
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
return (
<Child>
<button onClick={Child.getAlert()}>Click</button>
</Child>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
getAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
);
}
}
是否有一种方法从父调用子方法?
注意:子组件和父组件在两个不同的文件中。
当前回答
我们很高兴有一个自定义钩子，我们称之为useCounterKey。它只是设置了一个反键，或者一个从0开始计数的键。它返回的函数将重置键(即增量)。(我相信这是React中最常用的重置组件的方法-只需撞击键。)
然而，这个钩子也适用于任何情况下，你想发送一个一次性的消息给客户端做某事。例如，我们用它来聚焦子控件中的某个父事件——它只是在键更新时自动聚焦。(如果需要更多道具，它们可以在重置按键之前设置，以便在事件发生时可用。)
这个方法有一点学习曲线b/c，它不像典型的事件处理程序那么直接，但它似乎是我们在React中发现的最习惯的处理方法(因为键已经以这种方式起作用)。Def开放对这种方法的反馈，但它是工作得很好!
// Main helper hook:
export function useCounterKey() {
const [key, setKey] = useState(0);
return [key, () => setKey(prev => prev + 1)] as const;
}
示例用法:
// Sample 1 - normal React, just reset a control by changing Key on demand
function Sample1() {
const [inputLineCounterKey, resetInputLine] = useCounterKey();
return <>
<InputLine key={inputLineCounterKey} />
<button onClick={() => resetInputLine()} />
<>;
}
// Second sample - anytime the counterKey is incremented, child calls focus() on the input
function Sample2() {
const [amountFocusCounterKey, focusAmountInput] = useCounterKey();
// ... call focusAmountInput in some hook or event handler as needed
return <WorkoutAmountInput focusCounterKey={amountFocusCounterKey} />
}
function WorkoutAmountInput(props) {
useEffect(() => {
if (counterKey > 0) {
// Don't focus initially
focusAmount();
}
}, [counterKey]);
// ...
}
(counterKey的概念要归功于Kent Dodds。)
其他回答
你可以在这里使用另一个模式:
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child setClick={click => this.clickChild = click}/>
<button onClick={() => this.clickChild()}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.getAlert = this.getAlert.bind(this);
}
componentDidMount() {
this.props.setClick(this.getAlert);
}
getAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
);
}
}
它所做的是在挂载子节点时设置父节点的clickChild方法。这样，当你点击parent中的按钮时，它会调用clickChild，它会调用child的getAlert。
如果你的子文件是用connect()包装的，那么你就不需要getWrappedInstance()了。
注意你不能使用onClick={this。在父元素中使用clickChild}，因为当父元素被渲染时，子元素不会被挂载，所以这个。clickChild还没有被分配。使用onClick={() => this. clickchild()}是好的，因为当你点击按钮this. clickchild()}。clickChild应该已经被分配了。
在这里，我将给出四种可能的组合:
类父类|钩子子类 钩子父类|类子类 钩父钩子 类父类|类子类
1. 类父类|钩子子类
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.myRef = React.createRef()
}
render() {
return (<View>
<Child ref={this.myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => this.myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
}
const Child = React.forwardRef((props, ref) => {
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
childMethod() {
childMethod()
}
}))
function childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
})
2. 钩子父类|类子类
function Parent(props) {
const myRef = useRef()
return (<View>
<Child ref={myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
class Child extends React.Component {
childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
render() {
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
}
}
3.钩父钩子
function Parent(props) {
const myRef = useRef()
return (<View>
<Child ref={myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
const Child = React.forwardRef((props, ref) => {
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
childMethod() {
childMethod()
}
}))
function childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
})
4. 类父类|类子类
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.myRef = React.createRef()
}
render() {
return (<View>
<Child ref={this.myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => this.myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
}
class Child extends React.Component {
childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
render() {
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
}
}
我们可以用另一种方式使用refs，如-
我们将创建一个父元素，它将呈现一个<Child/>组件。如您所见，对于将要呈现的组件，您需要添加ref属性并为其提供名称。 然后，位于父类中的triggerChildAlert函数将访问this context的refs属性(当triggerChildAlert函数被触发时，它将访问子引用，并且它将具有子元素的所有函数)。
class Parent extends React.Component {
triggerChildAlert(){
this.refs.child.callChildMethod();
// to get child parent returned value-
// this.value = this.refs.child.callChildMethod();
// alert('Returned value- '+this.value);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{/* Note that you need to give a value to the ref parameter, in this case child*/}
<Child ref="child" />
<button onClick={this.triggerChildAlert}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}
现在，子组件，就像之前理论上设计的那样，看起来像:
class Child extends React.Component {
callChildMethod() {
alert('Hello World');
// to return some value
// return this.state.someValue;
}
render() {
return (
<h1>Hello</h1>
);
}
}
这里是源代码- 希望对你有所帮助!
I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:
// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {
function someParentFunction() {
// The child component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the function inside the child component.
biRef.someChildFunction();
}
// Add all the functions here that the child can call.
var biRef = {
someParentFunction: someParentFunction
}
return <div>
<MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {
function someChildFunction() {
// The parent component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the parent function.
props.biRef.someParentFunction();
}
// Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
// to be able to call.
props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;
return <div>
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
这种解决方案的另一个优点是，您可以在父节点和子节点中添加更多的函数，同时只使用一个属性将它们从父节点传递给子节点。
对上述代码的改进是不直接向biRef对象添加父函数和子函数，而是向子成员添加。父函数应该添加到名为“Parent”的成员中，而子函数应该添加到名为“child”的成员中。
// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {
function someParentFunction() {
// The child component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the function inside the child component.
biRef.child.someChildFunction();
}
// Add all the functions here that the child can call.
var biRef = {
parent: {
someParentFunction: someParentFunction
}
}
return <div>
<MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {
function someChildFunction() {
// The parent component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the parent function.
props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
}
// Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
// to be able to call.
props.biRef {
child: {
someChildFunction: someChildFunction
}
}
return <div>
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
通过将父函数和子函数放在biRef对象的独立成员中，您将在两者之间有一个清晰的分离，并且很容易看到哪个属于父函数或子函数。如果父组件和子组件中都出现了相同的函数，它还有助于防止子组件意外地覆盖父函数。
One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.
你可以很容易地使用你的子组件作为react自定义钩子来应用这个逻辑。
如何实施?
子函数返回一个函数。 子函数返回JSON:{函数、HTML或其他值}作为示例。
在这个例子中，应用这个逻辑没有意义，但很容易看出:
const {useState} = React; //Parent const Parent = () => { //custome hook const child = useChild(); return ( <div> {child.display} <button onClick={child.alert}> Parent call child </button> {child.btn} </div> ); }; //Child const useChild = () => { const [clickCount, setClick] = React.useState(0); {/* child button*/} const btn = ( <button onClick={() => { setClick(clickCount + 1); }} > Click me </button> ); return { btn: btn, //function called from parent alert: () => { alert("You clicked " + clickCount + " times"); }, display: <h1>{clickCount}</h1> }; }; const rootElement = document.getElementById("root"); ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, rootElement); <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script> <div id="root"></div>
