这个模式类似于@brickingup answer。但是在这个版本中，你可以设置任意多的子动作。

import { useEffect } from "react";

export const Parent = () => {
  const childEvents = { click: () => {} };

  return (
    <div onClick={() => childEvents.click()}>
      <Child events={childEvents}></Child>
    </div>
  );
};

export const Child = (props) => {
  const click = () => {
    alert("click from child");
  };

  useEffect(() => {
    if (props.events) {
      props.events.click = click;
    }
  }, []);

  return <span>Child Component</span>;
};

这个模式类似于@brickingup answer。但是在这个版本中，你可以设置任意多的子动作。

import { useEffect } from "react";

export const Parent = () => {
  const childEvents = { click: () => {} };

  return (
    <div onClick={() => childEvents.click()}>
      <Child events={childEvents}></Child>
    </div>
  );
};

export const Child = (props) => {
  const click = () => {
    alert("click from child");
  };

  useEffect(() => {
    if (props.events) {
      props.events.click = click;
    }
  }, []);

  return <span>Child Component</span>;
};

https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/expose-component-functions.html 更多答案请参考这里调用React子组件上的方法

通过查看“reason”组件的引用，您正在破坏封装，如果不仔细检查使用该组件的所有位置，就不可能重构该组件。正因为如此，我们强烈建议将引用视为组件的私有，就像状态一样。

一般来说，数据应该通过道具沿着树向下传递。有一些例外情况(比如调用.focus()或触发一个不会真正“改变”状态的一次性动画)，但任何时候你要公开一个名为“set”的方法，道具通常是更好的选择。试着让内部输入组件担心它的大小和外观，这样它的祖先就不会担心。

使用useEffect的替代方法:

家长:

const [refresh, doRefresh] = useState(0);
<Button onClick={() => doRefresh(prev => prev + 1)} />
<Children refresh={refresh} />

孩子们:

useEffect(() => {
    performRefresh(); //children function of interest
  }, [props.refresh]);

逻辑很简单。

在父类中使用child或ref创建一个函数。

我更喜欢父用子的创建功能。有很多种方法。

使用功能组件时

在父

function Parent(){
  const [functionToCall, createFunctionToCall] = useState(()=>()=>{})

  return (
   <Child createFunctionToCall={createFunctionToCall} />
  )
}

在儿童

function Child({createFunctionToCall}){
  useEffect(()=>{
    function theFunctionToCall(){
      // do something like setting something
      // don't forget to set dependancies properly.
    }
    createFunctionToCall(()=>theFunctionToCall)
  },[createFunctionToCall])
}

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      someParentFunction: someParentFunction
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

这种解决方案的另一个优点是，您可以在父节点和子节点中添加更多的函数，同时只使用一个属性将它们从父节点传递给子节点。

对上述代码的改进是不直接向biRef对象添加父函数和子函数，而是向子成员添加。父函数应该添加到名为“Parent”的成员中，而子函数应该添加到名为“child”的成员中。

// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {

   function someParentFunction() {
      // The child component can call this function.
   }

   function onButtonClick() {
       // Call the function inside the child component.
       biRef.child.someChildFunction();
   }

   // Add all the functions here that the child can call.
   var biRef = {
      parent: {
          someParentFunction: someParentFunction
      }
   }

   return <div>
       <MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}


// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {

   function someChildFunction() {
      // The parent component can call this function.
   }


   function onButtonClick() {
      // Call the parent function.
      props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
   }

   // Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
   // to be able to call.
   props.biRef {
       child: {
            someChildFunction: someChildFunction
       }
   }

   return <div>
       <Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
   </div>;
}

通过将父函数和子函数放在biRef对象的独立成员中，您将在两者之间有一个清晰的分离，并且很容易看到哪个属于父函数或子函数。如果父组件和子组件中都出现了相同的函数，它还有助于防止子组件意外地覆盖父函数。

One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.