当你打算粉刷你的房子时，通常很难得到一个确切的颜色组合。通常，你脑海中有一些颜色，但它不是其中一种颜色，供应商向你展示。

昨天，我的GA研究员教授提到了一个发生在德国的真实故事(对不起，我没有更多的参考资料，是的，如果有人要求我可以找到它)。这个家伙(让我们称他为配色员)曾经挨家挨户地帮助人们找到确切的颜色代码(RGB)，这将是客户心目中的衣柜。下面是他的做法:

The color guy used to carry with him a software program which used GA. He used to start with 4 different colors- each coded as a coded Chromosome (whose decoded value would be a RGB value). The consumer picks 1 of the 4 colors (Which is the closest to which he/she has in mind). The program would then assign the maximum fitness to that individual and move onto the next generation using mutation/crossover. The above steps would be repeated till the consumer had found the exact color and then color guy used to tell him the RGB combination!

通过将最大适应度分配给接近消费者想法的颜色，配色员的程序增加了收敛到消费者想法的颜色的机会。我发现它很有趣!

现在我已经得到了一个-1，如果你计划更多的-1，请说明这样做的原因!

我和一个同事正在研究一种解决方案，使用我们公司要求的各种标准将货物装载到卡车上。我一直在研究遗传算法的解决方案，而他正在使用具有激进修剪的分支和绑定。我们仍在实施这个解决方案的过程中，但到目前为止，我们已经取得了良好的结果。

I used a simple genetic algorithm to optimize the signal to noise ratio of a wave that was represented as a binary string. By flipping the the bits certain ways over several million generations I was able to produce a transform that resulted in a higher signal to noise ratio of that wave. The algorithm could have also been "Simulated Annealing" but was not used in this case. At their core, genetic algorithms are simple, and this was about as simple of a use case that I have seen, so I didn't use a framework for generation creation and selection - only a random seed and the Signal-to-Noise Ratio function at hand.

进化计算研究生班: 开发了TopCoder马拉松比赛49:megpartty的解决方案。我的小组正在测试不同的域表示法，以及不同的表示法如何影响ga找到正确答案的能力。我们为这个问题编写了自己的代码。

Neuroevolution and Generative and Developmental Systems, Graduate Class: Developed an Othello game board evaluator that was used in the min-max tree of a computer player. The player was set to evaluate one-deep into the game, and trained to play against a greedy computer player that considered corners of vital importance. The training player saw either 3 or 4 deep (I'll need to look at my config files to answer, and they're on a different computer). The goal of the experiment was to compare Novelty Search to traditional, fitness-based search in the Game Board Evaluation domain. Results were relatively inconclusive, unfortunately. While both the novelty search and fitness-based search methods came to a solution (showing that Novelty Search can be used in the Othello domain), it was possible to have a solution to this domain with no hidden nodes. Apparently I didn't create a sufficiently competent trainer if a linear solution was available (and it was possible to have a solution right out of the gates). I believe my implementation of Fitness-based search produced solutions more quickly than my implementation of Novelty search, this time. (this isn't always the case). Either way, I used ANJI, "Another NEAT Java Implementation" for the neural network code, with various modifications. The Othello game I wrote myself.

足球引爆。我建立了一个GA系统来预测每周澳式足球比赛的结果。

A few years ago I got bored of the standard work football pool, everybody was just going online and taking the picks from some pundit in the press. So, I figured it couldn't be too hard to beat a bunch of broadcast journalism majors, right? My first thought was to take the results from Massey Ratings and then reveal at the end of the season my strategy after winning fame and glory. However, for reasons I've never discovered Massey does not track AFL. The cynic in me believes it is because the outcome of each AFL game has basically become random chance, but my complaints of recent rule changes belong in a different forum.

该系统基本上考虑了进攻强度、防守强度、主场优势、每周的改进(或缺乏)以及这些方面的变化速度。这为每支球队在整个赛季中建立了一组多项式方程。可以计算给定日期的每场比赛的获胜者和分数。我们的目标是找到最接近过去所有游戏结果的系数集，并使用该集合来预测接下来几周的游戏。

在实践中，该系统将找到能够准确预测过去90%以上游戏结果的解决方案。然后，它会成功地为即将到来的一周(即不在训练集中的那一周)挑选大约60-80%的比赛。

结果是:略高于中游水平。没有巨额奖金也没有能打败维加斯的系统。不过很有趣。

我从零开始构建一切，没有使用任何框架。

在工作中，我遇到了这样一个问题:给定M个任务和N个dsp，如何将任务分配给dsp是最好的?“最佳”定义为“最大负载DSP的负载最小化”。有不同类型的任务，不同的任务类型有不同的性能分支，这取决于它们被分配到哪里，所以我将一组工作到dsp的分配编码为“DNA字符串”，然后使用遗传算法来“培育”我所能“培育”的最佳分配字符串。

它运行得相当好(比我之前的方法好得多，之前的方法是评估每个可能的组合……对于非平凡问题的大小，它将需要数年才能完成!)，唯一的问题是无法判断是否已经达到了最优解。你只能决定当前的“最大努力”是否足够好，或者让它运行更长时间，看看它是否可以做得更好。