另一个答案，可能更快:)

distribution = [(1, 0.2), (2, 0.3), (3, 0.5)]  
# init distribution  
dlist = []  
sumchance = 0  
for value, chance in distribution:  
    sumchance += chance  
    dlist.append((value, sumchance))  
assert sumchance == 1.0 # not good assert because of float equality  

# get random value  
r = random.random()  
# for small distributions use lineair search  
if len(distribution) < 64: # don't know exact speed limit  
    for value, sumchance in dlist:  
        if r < sumchance:  
            return value  
else:  
    # else (not implemented) binary search algorithm  

scipy.stats。Rv_discrete可能是您想要的。您可以通过values参数提供您的概率。然后，您可以使用分布对象的rvs()方法来生成随机数。

正如Eugene Pakhomov在评论中指出的那样，你也可以将p关键字参数传递给numpy.random.choice()，例如:

numpy.random.choice(numpy.arange(1, 7), p=[0.1, 0.05, 0.05, 0.2, 0.4, 0.2])

如果你使用的是Python 3.6或更高版本，你可以使用标准库中的random.choices() -请参阅Mark Dickinson的回答。

基于其他解决方案，您可以生成累积分布(作为整数或浮点数)，然后您可以使用平分使其更快

这是一个简单的例子(我在这里使用整数)

l=[(20, 'foo'), (60, 'banana'), (10, 'monkey'), (10, 'monkey2')]
def get_cdf(l):
    ret=[]
    c=0
    for i in l: c+=i[0]; ret.append((c, i[1]))
    return ret

def get_random_item(cdf):
    return cdf[bisect.bisect_left(cdf, (random.randint(0, cdf[-1][0]),))][1]

cdf=get_cdf(l)
for i in range(100): print get_random_item(cdf),

get_cdf函数会将20、60、10、10转换为20、20+60、20+60+10、20+60+10+10

现在我们随机选择一个20+60+10+10的随机数。然后我们用二分法快速得到实际值

根据物品的重量列出一个清单:

items = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
probabilities= [0.1, 0.05, 0.05, 0.2, 0.4, 0.2]
# if the list of probs is normalized (sum(probs) == 1), omit this part
prob = sum(probabilities) # find sum of probs, to normalize them
c = (1.0)/prob # a multiplier to make a list of normalized probs
probabilities = map(lambda x: c*x, probabilities)
print probabilities

ml = max(probabilities, key=lambda x: len(str(x)) - str(x).find('.'))
ml = len(str(ml)) - str(ml).find('.') -1
amounts = [ int(x*(10**ml)) for x in probabilities]
itemsList = list()
for i in range(0, len(items)): # iterate through original items
  itemsList += items[i:i+1]*amounts[i]

# choose from itemsList randomly
print itemsList

优化可能是用最大公约数归一化，使目标列表更小。

另外，这可能会很有趣。

(好吧，我知道你想要薄膜包装，但也许这些自制的解决方案对你来说不够简洁。: -)

pdf = [(1, 0.1), (2, 0.05), (3, 0.05), (4, 0.2), (5, 0.4), (6, 0.2)]
cdf = [(i, sum(p for j,p in pdf if j < i)) for i,_ in pdf]
R = max(i for r in [random.random()] for i,c in cdf if c <= r)

我伪确认，这是通过目测这个表达式的输出:

sorted(max(i for r in [random.random()] for i,c in cdf if c <= r)
       for _ in range(1000))

另一个答案，可能更快:)

distribution = [(1, 0.2), (2, 0.3), (3, 0.5)]  
# init distribution  
dlist = []  
sumchance = 0  
for value, chance in distribution:  
    sumchance += chance  
    dlist.append((value, sumchance))  
assert sumchance == 1.0 # not good assert because of float equality  

# get random value  
r = random.random()  
# for small distributions use lineair search  
if len(distribution) < 64: # don't know exact speed limit  
    for value, sumchance in dlist:  
        if r < sumchance:  
            return value  
else:  
    # else (not implemented) binary search algorithm