(改进Karthik Kumar的回答)

这个解决方案是使用编译器来保证你不会错过一个case。

enum Suit: String {
    case spades = "♠"
    case hearts = "♥"
    case diamonds = "♦"
    case clubs = "♣"

    static var enumerate: [Suit] {
        switch Suit.spades {
        // make sure the two lines are identical ^_^
        case        .spades, .hearts, .diamonds, .clubs:
            return [.spades, .hearts, .diamonds, .clubs]
        }
    }
}

对不起，我的回答是具体到我如何在我需要做的事情中使用这篇文章。对于那些无意中遇到这个问题的人，寻找一种方法在枚举中找到一个case，这是一种方法(Swift 2新增):

编辑:小写驼峰现在是Swift 3 enum值的标准

// From apple docs: If the raw-value type is specified as String and you don’t assign values to the cases explicitly, each unassigned case is implicitly assigned a string with the same text as the name of that case.

enum Theme: String
    {
    case white, blue, green, lavender, grey
    }

func loadTheme(theme: String)
    {
    // this checks the string against the raw value of each enum case (note that the check could result in a nil value, since it's an optional, which is why we introduce the if/let block
    if let testTheme = Theme(rawValue: theme)
        {
        // testTheme is guaranteed to have an enum value at this point
        self.someOtherFunction(testTheme)
        }
    }

对于那些对枚举感到疑惑的人来说，本页上给出的答案包括一个包含所有枚举值的数组的静态var/let是正确的。最新的苹果tvOS示例代码包含了完全相同的技术。

也就是说，他们应该在语言中构建一个更方便的机制(苹果，你在听吗?)

它花了我一点，而不仅仅是一个方法在结构像swift书调用，但我在枚举中设置了下一个函数。我会使用一个协议，我不知道为什么，但有秩设置为int混乱。

enum Rank: Int {
    case Ace = 1
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Ace:
            return "ace"
        case .Jack:
            return "jack"
        case .Queen:
            return "Queen"
        case .King:
            return "King"
        default:
            return String(self.toRaw())
        }
    }
    mutating func next() -> Rank {
        var rank = self
        var rawrank = rank.toRaw()
        var nrank: Rank = self
        rawrank = rawrank + 1
        if let newRank = Rank.fromRaw(rawrank) {
            println("\(newRank.simpleDescription())")
            nrank = newRank
        } else {
            return self
        }
        return nrank
    }
}

enum Suit {
    case Spades, Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
    func color() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Spades, .Clubs:
            return "black"
        default:
            return "red"
        }
    }
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        switch self {
        case .Spades:
            return "spades"
        case .Hearts:
            return "hearts"
        case .Diamonds:
            return "diamonds"
        case .Clubs:
            return "clubs"
        }
    }
    mutating func next() -> Suit {
        switch self {
        case .Spades:
            return Hearts
        case .Hearts:
            return Diamonds
        case .Diamonds:
            return Clubs
        case .Clubs:
            return Spades
        }
    }
}

struct Card {
    var rank: Rank
    var suit: Suit
    func deck() -> Card[] {
        var tRank = self.rank
        var tSuit = self.suit
        let tcards = 52 // we start from 0
        var cards: Card[] = []
        for i in 0..tcards {
            var card = Card(rank: tRank, suit: tSuit)
            cards.append(card)
            tRank = tRank.next()
            tSuit = tSuit.next()
        }
        return cards
    }
    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
    }
}

var card = Card(rank: .Ace, suit: .Spades)
var deck = card.deck()

我使用了一些常识，但这可以通过将花色乘以等级来轻松纠正(如果你没有使用标准的桥牌，你必须相应地改变枚举，如果基本上只是通过不同的枚举进行步骤)。为了节省时间，我使用了ranks rawValues，如果你愿意，你也可以为西装做同样的事情。然而，这个例子没有它，所以我决定在不改变suit rawValue的情况下找出它

enum Rank: Int
{
    case Ace = 0
    case Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seve, Eight, Nine, Ten
    case Jack, Queen, King
    case Count
}

enum Suit : Int
{
    case Spades = 0
    case Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs
    case Count
}

struct Card
{
    var rank:Rank
    var suit:Suit
}

class Test
{
    func makeDeck() -> Card[]
    {
        let suitsCount:Int = Suit.Count.toRaw()
        let rankCount:Int = Rank.Count.toRaw()
        let repeatedCard:Card = Card(rank:Rank.Ace, suit:Suit.Spades)
        let deck:Card[] = Card[](count:suitsCount*rankCount, repeatedValue:repeatedCard)

        for i:Int in 0..rankCount
        {
            for j:Int in 0..suitsCount
            {
                deck[i*suitsCount+j] = Card(rank: Rank.fromRaw(i)!, suit: Suit.fromRaw(j)!)
            }
        }
        return deck
    }
}

根据Rick的回答:这要快5倍

与@Kametrixom的答案在这里，我相信返回一个数组将比返回AnySequence更好，因为你可以访问所有数组的好东西，如计数等。

以下是改写后的内容:

public protocol EnumCollection : Hashable {}
extension EnumCollection {
    public static func allValues() -> [Self] {
        typealias S = Self
        let retVal = AnySequence { () -> AnyGenerator<S> in
            var raw = 0
            return AnyGenerator {
                let current : Self = withUnsafePointer(&raw) { UnsafePointer($0).memory }
                guard current.hashValue == raw else { return nil }
                raw += 1
                return current
            }
        }

        return [S](retVal)
    }
}

实验内容是: 实验

在Card中添加一个方法，用于创建一副完整的牌，每一副牌都是rank和花色的组合。

因此，除了添加方法之外，没有修改或增强给定的代码(并且没有使用还没有教过的东西)，我想出了这个解决方案:

struct Card {
    var rank: Rank
    var suit: Suit

    func simpleDescription() -> String {
        return "The \(rank.simpleDescription()) of \(suit.simpleDescription())"
    }

    func createDeck() -> [Card] {
        var deck: [Card] = []
        for rank in Rank.Ace.rawValue...Rank.King.rawValue {
            for suit in Suit.Spades.rawValue...Suit.Clubs.rawValue {
                let card = Card(rank: Rank(rawValue: rank)!, suit: Suit(rawValue: suit)!)
                //println(card.simpleDescription())
                deck += [card]
            }
        }
        return deck
    }
}
let threeOfSpades = Card(rank: .Three, suit: .Spades)
let threeOfSpadesDescription = threeOfSpades.simpleDescription()
let deck = threeOfSpades.createDeck()