在c#中合并2个或更多字典(Dictionary<TKey, TValue>)的最佳方法是什么?
(像LINQ这样的3.0特性就可以了)。
我正在考虑一个方法签名,如下所示:
public static Dictionary<TKey,TValue>
Merge<TKey,TValue>(Dictionary<TKey,TValue>[] dictionaries);
or
public static Dictionary<TKey,TValue>
Merge<TKey,TValue>(IEnumerable<Dictionary<TKey,TValue>> dictionaries);
关于重复键的处理:在发生冲突的情况下,保存到字典中的值并不重要,只要它是一致的。
使用equalitycompararer进行合并,它将项目映射到不同的值/类型进行比较。这里我们将从KeyValuePair(枚举字典时的项类型)映射到Key。
public class MappedEqualityComparer<T,U> : EqualityComparer<T>
{
Func<T,U> _map;
public MappedEqualityComparer(Func<T,U> map)
{
_map = map;
}
public override bool Equals(T x, T y)
{
return EqualityComparer<U>.Default.Equals(_map(x), _map(y));
}
public override int GetHashCode(T obj)
{
return _map(obj).GetHashCode();
}
}
用法:
// if dictA and dictB are of type Dictionary<int,string>
var dict = dictA.Concat(dictB)
.Distinct(new MappedEqualityComparer<KeyValuePair<int,string>,int>(item => item.Key))
.ToDictionary(item => item.Key, item=> item.Value);
这个聚会现在几乎已经死了,但是user166390的“改进”版本已经进入了我的扩展库。
除了一些细节之外,我还添加了一个委托来计算合并的值。
/// <summary>
/// Merges a dictionary against an array of other dictionaries.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="TResult">The type of the resulting dictionary.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TKey">The type of the key in the resulting dictionary.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TValue">The type of the value in the resulting dictionary.</typeparam>
/// <param name="source">The source dictionary.</param>
/// <param name="mergeBehavior">A delegate returning the merged value. (Parameters in order: The current key, The current value, The previous value)</param>
/// <param name="mergers">Dictionaries to merge against.</param>
/// <returns>The merged dictionary.</returns>
public static TResult MergeLeft<TResult, TKey, TValue>(
this TResult source,
Func<TKey, TValue, TValue, TValue> mergeBehavior,
params IDictionary<TKey, TValue>[] mergers)
where TResult : IDictionary<TKey, TValue>, new()
{
var result = new TResult();
var sources = new List<IDictionary<TKey, TValue>> { source }
.Concat(mergers);
foreach (var kv in sources.SelectMany(src => src))
{
TValue previousValue;
result.TryGetValue(kv.Key, out previousValue);
result[kv.Key] = mergeBehavior(kv.Key, kv.Value, previousValue);
}
return result;
}
@Tim:应该是注释,但是注释不允许代码编辑。
Dictionary<string, string> t1 = new Dictionary<string, string>();
t1.Add("a", "aaa");
Dictionary<string, string> t2 = new Dictionary<string, string>();
t2.Add("b", "bee");
Dictionary<string, string> t3 = new Dictionary<string, string>();
t3.Add("c", "cee");
t3.Add("d", "dee");
t3.Add("b", "bee");
Dictionary<string, string> merged = t1.MergeLeft(t2, t2, t3);
注意:我应用了@ANeves对@Andrew Orsich的解决方案的修改,所以mergleft现在看起来像这样:
public static Dictionary<K, V> MergeLeft<K, V>(this Dictionary<K, V> me, params IDictionary<K, V>[] others)
{
var newMap = new Dictionary<K, V>(me, me.Comparer);
foreach (IDictionary<K, V> src in
(new List<IDictionary<K, V>> { me }).Concat(others))
{
// ^-- echk. Not quite there type-system.
foreach (KeyValuePair<K, V> p in src)
{
newMap[p.Key] = p.Value;
}
}
return newMap;
}
使用equalitycompararer进行合并,它将项目映射到不同的值/类型进行比较。这里我们将从KeyValuePair(枚举字典时的项类型)映射到Key。
public class MappedEqualityComparer<T,U> : EqualityComparer<T>
{
Func<T,U> _map;
public MappedEqualityComparer(Func<T,U> map)
{
_map = map;
}
public override bool Equals(T x, T y)
{
return EqualityComparer<U>.Default.Equals(_map(x), _map(y));
}
public override int GetHashCode(T obj)
{
return _map(obj).GetHashCode();
}
}
用法:
// if dictA and dictB are of type Dictionary<int,string>
var dict = dictA.Concat(dictB)
.Distinct(new MappedEqualityComparer<KeyValuePair<int,string>,int>(item => item.Key))
.ToDictionary(item => item.Key, item=> item.Value);
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
public static class DictionaryExtensions
{
public enum MergeKind { SkipDuplicates, OverwriteDuplicates }
public static void Merge<K, V>(this IDictionary<K, V> target, IDictionary<K, V> source, MergeKind kind = MergeKind.SkipDuplicates) =>
source.ToList().ForEach(_ => { if (kind == MergeKind.OverwriteDuplicates || !target.ContainsKey(_.Key)) target[_.Key] = _.Value; });
}
你可以跳过/忽略(默认)或覆盖副本:如果你对Linq性能不过分挑剔,而是像我一样喜欢简洁的可维护代码:在这种情况下,你可以删除默认的MergeKind。skipduplicate用于强制调用者进行选择,并使开发人员知道结果将是什么!