License keys are the defacto-standard as an anti-piracy measure. To be honest, this strikes me as (in)Security Through Obscurity, although I really have no idea how license keys are generated. What is a good (secure) example of license key generation? What cryptographic primitive (if any) are they using? Is it a message digest? If so, what data would they be hashing? What methods do developers employ to make it difficult for crackers to build their own key generators? How are key generators made?
当前回答
密钥系统必须具有以下几个属性:
只有很少的键是有效的 即使给定用户拥有的一切,有效的键也必须是不可派生的。 一个系统上的有效密钥在另一个系统上不是有效密钥。 其他人
One solution that should give you these would be to use a public key signing scheme. Start with a "system hash" (say grab the macs on any NICs, sorted, and the CPU-ID info, plus some other stuff, concatenate it all together and take an MD5 of the result (you really don't want to be handling personally identifiable information if you don't have to)) append the CD's serial number and refuse to boot unless some registry key (or some datafile) has a valid signature for the blob. The user activates the program by shipping the blob to you and you ship back the signature.
潜在的问题包括,你提供的签名几乎是任何东西,所以你需要假设有人会运行选定的纯文本和/或选定的密文攻击。可以通过检查提供的序列号并拒绝处理来自无效序列号的请求,以及拒绝在一段时间内(例如每年2次)处理来自给定s/n的超过给定数量的查询来缓解这一问题。
我应该指出几件事:首先,一个熟练和坚定的攻击者将能够绕过他们拥有无限制访问权限的部分(即CD上的所有内容)的任何和所有安全性,您对该帐户所能做的最好的事情是使其更难获得非法访问而不是获得合法访问。其次,我不是专家,所以这个提议的方案可能存在严重的缺陷。
其他回答
请查看关于部分密钥验证的文章,其中包括以下要求:
License keys must be easy enough to type in. We must be able to blacklist (revoke) a license key in the case of chargebacks or purchases with stolen credit cards. No “phoning home” to test keys. Although this practice is becoming more and more prevalent, I still do not appreciate it as a user, so will not ask my users to put up with it. It should not be possible for a cracker to disassemble our released application and produce a working “keygen” from it. This means that our application will not fully test a key for verification. Only some of the key is to be tested. Further, each release of the application should test a different portion of the key, so that a phony key based on an earlier release will not work on a later release of our software. Important: it should not be possible for a legitimate user to accidentally type in an invalid key that will appear to work but fail on a future version due to a typographical error.
我对人们如何生成CD密钥没有任何经验,但是(假设你不想走在线激活的道路)这里有一些方法可以生成密钥:
Require that the number be divisible by (say) 17. Trivial to guess, if you have access to many keys, but the majority of potential strings will be invalid. Similar would be requiring that the checksum of the key match a known value. Require that the first half of the key, when concatenated with a known value, hashes down to the second half of the key. Better, but the program still contains all the information needed to generate keys as well as to validate them. Generate keys by encrypting (with a private key) a known value + nonce. This can be verified by decrypting using the corresponding public key and verifying the known value. The program now has enough information to verify the key without being able to generate keys.
这些漏洞仍然容易受到攻击:程序仍然存在,可以通过打补丁绕过检查。更聪明的方法可能是使用第三个方法的已知值加密部分程序,而不是将值存储在程序中。这样,在解密程序之前,你必须找到密钥的副本,但一旦解密,它仍然很容易被复制,并且有一个人拿着他们的合法副本,并使用它使其他人能够访问软件。
所有的CD拷贝保护算法给诚实的用户带来不便,同时没有提供任何防止盗版的保护。
“盗版者”只需要获得一张合法的cd及其访问代码,他就可以制作n份拷贝并分发它们。
无论代码的加密安全性如何,都需要以明文形式提供CD,否则合法用户无法激活该软件。
Most secure schemes involve either the user providing the software supplier with some details of the machine which will run the software (cpu serial numbers, mac addresses, Ip address etc.), or, require online access to register the software on the suppliers website and in return receive an activitation token. The first option requires a lot of manual administration and is only worth it for very high value software, the, second option can be spoofed and is absolutly infuriating if you have limited network access or you are stuck behind a firewall.
总的来说,与客户建立信任关系要容易得多!
密钥系统必须具有以下几个属性:
只有很少的键是有效的 即使给定用户拥有的一切,有效的键也必须是不可派生的。 一个系统上的有效密钥在另一个系统上不是有效密钥。 其他人
One solution that should give you these would be to use a public key signing scheme. Start with a "system hash" (say grab the macs on any NICs, sorted, and the CPU-ID info, plus some other stuff, concatenate it all together and take an MD5 of the result (you really don't want to be handling personally identifiable information if you don't have to)) append the CD's serial number and refuse to boot unless some registry key (or some datafile) has a valid signature for the blob. The user activates the program by shipping the blob to you and you ship back the signature.
潜在的问题包括,你提供的签名几乎是任何东西,所以你需要假设有人会运行选定的纯文本和/或选定的密文攻击。可以通过检查提供的序列号并拒绝处理来自无效序列号的请求,以及拒绝在一段时间内(例如每年2次)处理来自给定s/n的超过给定数量的查询来缓解这一问题。
我应该指出几件事:首先,一个熟练和坚定的攻击者将能够绕过他们拥有无限制访问权限的部分(即CD上的所有内容)的任何和所有安全性,您对该帐户所能做的最好的事情是使其更难获得非法访问而不是获得合法访问。其次,我不是专家,所以这个提议的方案可能存在严重的缺陷。
您可以在使用它的软件项目中非常容易地使用和实现安全许可API(您需要从https://www.systemsoulsoftwares.com/下载创建安全许可的桌面应用程序)。
Creates unique UID for client software based on System Hardware(CPU,Motherboard,Hard-drive) (UID acts as Private Key for that unique system) Allows to send Encrypted license string very easily to client system, It verifies license string and works on only that particular system This method allows software developers or company to store more information about software/developer/distributor services/features/client It gives control for locking and unlocked the client software features, saving time of developers for making more version for same software with changing features It take cares about trial version too for any number of days It secures the License timeline by Checking DateTime online during registration It unlocks all hardware information to developers It has all pre-build and custom function that developer can access at every process of licensing for making more complex secure code
推荐文章
- JavaScript:客户端验证与服务器端验证
- ASP。NET身份的默认密码散列器-它是如何工作的,它是安全的?
- 为什么质数在密码学中很重要?
- 主体、使用者和主体之间的意义和区别是什么?
- 阻止人们入侵基于php的Flash游戏高分表的最佳方法是什么
- 在php中生成一个随机密码
- java.util.Random和java.security. securerrandom的区别
- Docker和安全密码
- 准备好的语句如何防止SQL注入攻击?
- 为什么人们会写“throw 1;<不要邪恶>”和“for(;;);”在json响应前?
- 非加密用途的最快哈希?
- SHA512 vs. Blowfish和Bcrypt
- cer、pvk和pfx文件有什么区别?
- Django设置“SECRET_KEY”的目的是什么?
- 如何从命令行重置Jenkins安全设置?