一个Node.JS JavaScript解决方案。在不到一秒钟的时间内计算所有100个独特的单词，其中包括阅读字典文件(MBA 2012)。

Output: ["FAM","TUX","TUB","FAE","ELI","ELM","ELB","TWA","TWA","SAW","AMI","SWA","SWA","AME","SEA","SEW","AES","AWL","AWE","SEA","AWA","MIX","MIL","AST","ASE","MAX","MAE","MAW","MEW","AWE","MES","AWL","LIE","LIM","AWA","AES","BUT","BLO","WAS","WAE","WEA","LEI","LEO","LOB","LOX","WEM","OIL","OLM","WEA","WAE","WAX","WAF","MILO","EAST","WAME","TWAS","TWAE","EMIL","WEAM","OIME","AXIL","WEST","TWAE","LIMB","WASE","WAST","BLEO","STUB","BOIL","BOLE","LIME","SAWT","LIMA","MESA","MEWL","AXLE","FAME","ASEM","MILE","AMIL","SEAX","SEAM","SEMI","SWAM","AMBO","AMLI","AXILE","AMBLE","SWAMI","AWEST","AWEST","LIMAX","LIMES","LIMBU","LIMBO","EMBOX","SEMBLE","EMBOLE","WAMBLE","FAMBLE"]

代码:

var fs = require('fs')

var Node = function(value, row, col) {
    this.value = value
    this.row = row
    this.col = col
}

var Path = function() {
    this.nodes = []
}

Path.prototype.push = function(node) {
    this.nodes.push(node)
    return this
}

Path.prototype.contains = function(node) {
    for (var i = 0, ii = this.nodes.length; i < ii; i++) {
        if (this.nodes[i] === node) {
            return true
        }
    }

    return false
}

Path.prototype.clone = function() {
    var path = new Path()
    path.nodes = this.nodes.slice(0)
    return path
}

Path.prototype.to_word = function() {
    var word = ''

    for (var i = 0, ii = this.nodes.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        word += this.nodes[i].value
    }

    return word
}

var Board = function(nodes, dict) {
    // Expects n x m array.
    this.nodes = nodes
    this.words = []
    this.row_count = nodes.length
    this.col_count = nodes[0].length
    this.dict = dict
}

Board.from_raw = function(board, dict) {
    var ROW_COUNT = board.length
      , COL_COUNT = board[0].length

    var nodes = []

    // Replace board with Nodes
    for (var i = 0, ii = ROW_COUNT; i < ii; ++i) {
        nodes.push([])
        for (var j = 0, jj = COL_COUNT; j < jj; ++j) {
            nodes[i].push(new Node(board[i][j], i, j))
        }
    }

    return new Board(nodes, dict)
}

Board.prototype.toString = function() {
    return JSON.stringify(this.nodes)
}

Board.prototype.update_potential_words = function(dict) {
    for (var i = 0, ii = this.row_count; i < ii; ++i) {
        for (var j = 0, jj = this.col_count; j < jj; ++j) {
            var node = this.nodes[i][j]
              , path = new Path()

            path.push(node)

            this.dfs_search(path)
        }
    }
}

Board.prototype.on_board = function(row, col) {
    return 0 <= row && row < this.row_count && 0 <= col && col < this.col_count
}

Board.prototype.get_unsearched_neighbours = function(path) {
    var last_node = path.nodes[path.nodes.length - 1]

    var offsets = [
        [-1, -1], [-1,  0], [-1, +1]
      , [ 0, -1],           [ 0, +1]
      , [+1, -1], [+1,  0], [+1, +1]
    ]

    var neighbours = []

    for (var i = 0, ii = offsets.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        var offset = offsets[i]
        if (this.on_board(last_node.row + offset[0], last_node.col + offset[1])) {

            var potential_node = this.nodes[last_node.row + offset[0]][last_node.col + offset[1]]
            if (!path.contains(potential_node)) {
                // Create a new path if on board and we haven't visited this node yet.
                neighbours.push(potential_node)
            }
        }
    }

    return neighbours
}

Board.prototype.dfs_search = function(path) {
    var path_word = path.to_word()

    if (this.dict.contains_exact(path_word) && path_word.length >= 3) {
        this.words.push(path_word)
    }

    var neighbours = this.get_unsearched_neighbours(path)

    for (var i = 0, ii = neighbours.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        var neighbour = neighbours[i]
        var new_path = path.clone()
        new_path.push(neighbour)

        if (this.dict.contains_prefix(new_path.to_word())) {
            this.dfs_search(new_path)
        }
    }
}

var Dict = function() {
    this.dict_array = []

    var dict_data = fs.readFileSync('./web2', 'utf8')
    var dict_array = dict_data.split('\n')

    for (var i = 0, ii = dict_array.length; i < ii; ++i) {
        dict_array[i] = dict_array[i].toUpperCase()
    }

    this.dict_array = dict_array.sort()
}

Dict.prototype.contains_prefix = function(prefix) {
    // Binary search
    return this.search_prefix(prefix, 0, this.dict_array.length)
}

Dict.prototype.contains_exact = function(exact) {
    // Binary search
    return this.search_exact(exact, 0, this.dict_array.length)
}

Dict.prototype.search_prefix = function(prefix, start, end) {
    if (start >= end) {
        // If no more place to search, return no matter what.
        return this.dict_array[start].indexOf(prefix) > -1
    }

    var middle = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

    if (this.dict_array[middle].indexOf(prefix) > -1) {
        // If we prefix exists, return true.
        return true
    } else {
        // Recurse
        if (prefix <= this.dict_array[middle]) {
            return this.search_prefix(prefix, start, middle - 1)
        } else {
            return this.search_prefix(prefix, middle + 1, end)
        }
    }
}

Dict.prototype.search_exact = function(exact, start, end) {
    if (start >= end) {
        // If no more place to search, return no matter what.
        return this.dict_array[start] === exact
    }

    var middle = Math.floor((start + end)/2)

    if (this.dict_array[middle] === exact) {
        // If we prefix exists, return true.
        return true
    } else {
        // Recurse
        if (exact <= this.dict_array[middle]) {
            return this.search_exact(exact, start, middle - 1)
        } else {
            return this.search_exact(exact, middle + 1, end)
        }
    }
}

var board = [
    ['F', 'X', 'I', 'E']
  , ['A', 'M', 'L', 'O']
  , ['E', 'W', 'B', 'X']
  , ['A', 'S', 'T', 'U']
]

var dict = new Dict()

var b = Board.from_raw(board, dict)
b.update_potential_words()
console.log(JSON.stringify(b.words.sort(function(a, b) {
    return a.length - b.length
})))

我意识到这个问题的时间来了又去了，但由于我自己正在研究一个求解器，并在谷歌搜索时偶然发现了这个，我想我应该发布一个参考，因为它似乎与其他一些问题有点不同。

我选择在游戏棋盘上使用平面数组，并从棋盘上的每个字母进行递归搜索，从有效邻居遍历到有效邻居，如果索引中的有效前缀是当前字母列表，则扩展搜索。而遍历当前单词的概念是进入板的索引列表，而不是组成单词的字母。在检查索引时，将索引转换为字母并完成检查。

索引是一个蛮力字典，有点像trie，但允许对索引进行python查询。如果单词'cat'和'cater'在列表中，你会在字典中看到:

   d = { 'c': ['cat','cater'],
     'ca': ['cat','cater'],
     'cat': ['cat','cater'],
     'cate': ['cater'],
     'cater': ['cater'],
   }

因此，如果current_word是'ca'，您就知道它是一个有效的前缀，因为'ca'在d中返回True(因此继续遍历板)。如果current_word是'cat'，那么你知道它是一个有效的单词，因为它是一个有效的前缀，并且d['cat']中的'cat'也返回True。

如果感觉这允许一些可读的代码，似乎不是太慢。像其他人一样，这个系统的费用是读取/构建索引。解这个板子相当麻烦。

代码在http://gist.github.com/268079。它是故意垂直和幼稚的，有很多明确的有效性检查，因为我想理解问题，而不是用一堆魔法或晦涩难懂的东西把它弄得乱七八糟。

该解决方案还提供了在给定的板中搜索的方向

一件事:

1. Uses trie to save all the word in the english to fasten the search
2. The uses DFS to search the words in Boggle

输出:

Found "pic" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → →
Found "pick" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑
Found "pickman" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↑ ↖ ↑
Found "picket" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↗ ↖
Found "picked" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↗ ↘
Found "pickle" directions from (4,0)(p) go  → → ↑ ↘ →

代码:

from collections import defaultdict
from nltk.corpus import words
from nltk.corpus import stopwords
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize

english_words = words.words()

# If you wan to remove stop words
# stop_words = set(stopwords.words('english'))
# english_words = [w for w in english_words if w not in stop_words]

boggle = [
    ['c', 'n', 't', 's', 's'],
    ['d', 'a', 't', 'i', 'n'],
    ['o', 'o', 'm', 'e', 'l'],
    ['s', 'i', 'k', 'n', 'd'],
    ['p', 'i', 'c', 'l', 'e']
]

# Instead of X and Y co-ordinates
# better to use Row and column
lenc = len(boggle[0])
lenr = len(boggle)

# Initialize trie datastructure
trie_node = {'valid': False, 'next': {}}

# lets get the delta to find all the nighbors
neighbors_delta = [
    (-1,-1, "↖"),
    (-1, 0, "↑"),
    (-1, 1, "↗"),
    (0, -1, "←"),
    (0,  1, "→"),
    (1, -1, "↙"),
    (1,  0, "↓"),
    (1,  1, "↘"),
]


def gen_trie(word, node):
    """udpates the trie datastructure using the given word"""
    if not word:
        return

    if word[0] not in node:
        node[word[0]] = {'valid': len(word) == 1, 'next': {}}

    # recursively build trie
    gen_trie(word[1:], node[word[0]])


def build_trie(words, trie):
    """Builds trie data structure from the list of words given"""
    for word in words:
        gen_trie(word, trie)
    return trie


def get_neighbors(r, c):
    """Returns the neighbors for a given co-ordinates"""
    n = []
    for neigh in neighbors_delta:
        new_r = r + neigh[0]
        new_c = c + neigh[1]

        if (new_r >= lenr) or (new_c >= lenc) or (new_r < 0) or (new_c < 0):
            continue
        n.append((new_r, new_c, neigh[2]))
    return n


def dfs(r, c, visited, trie, now_word, direction):
    """Scan the graph using DFS"""
    if (r, c) in visited:
        return

    letter = boggle[r][c]
    visited.append((r, c))

    if letter in trie:
        now_word += letter

        if trie[letter]['valid']:
            print('Found "{}" {}'.format(now_word, direction))

        neighbors = get_neighbors(r, c)
        for n in neighbors:
            dfs(n[0], n[1], visited[::], trie[letter], now_word, direction + " " + n[2])


def main(trie_node):
    """Initiate the search for words in boggle"""
    trie_node = build_trie(english_words, trie_node)

    # print the board
    print("Given board")
    for i in range(lenr):print (boggle[i])
    print ('\n')

    for r in range(lenr):
        for c in range(lenc):
            letter = boggle[r][c]
            dfs(r, c, [], trie_node, '', 'directions from ({},{})({}) go '.format(r, c, letter))


if __name__ == '__main__':
    main(trie_node)

我不得不对一个完整的解决方案进行更多的思考，但作为一种方便的优化，我想知道是否值得根据字典中的所有单词预先计算一个图表和三字母组合(2字母和3字母组合)的频率表，并使用它来确定搜索的优先级。我会选择单词的首字母。因此，如果你的字典包含“印度”、“水”、“极端”和“非凡”这些词，那么你预先计算的表可能是:

'IN': 1
'WA': 1
'EX': 2

然后按照共性的顺序(首先是EX，然后是WA/ in)搜索这些图表

我建议根据单词做一个字母树。这棵树将由字母结构组成，像这样:

letter: char
isWord: boolean

然后构建树，每个深度添加一个新字母。换句话说，第一层是字母表;然后从这些树中，会有另外26个条目，以此类推，直到你把所有的单词都拼出来。坚持这个解析树，它将使所有可能的答案更快地查找。

使用这个解析过的树，您可以非常快速地找到解决方案。下面是伪代码:

BEGIN: 
    For each letter:
        if the struct representing it on the current depth has isWord == true, enter it as an answer.
        Cycle through all its neighbors; if there is a child of the current node corresponding to the letter, recursively call BEGIN on it.

这可以通过一些动态编程来加快。例如，在你的样本中，两个“A”都在一个“E”和一个“W”旁边，这(从它们击中它们的点来看)是相同的。我没有足够的时间来详细说明这个代码，但我想你们可以理解。

此外，我相信你会找到其他解决方案，如果你谷歌“Boggle solver”。

搞笑。几天前我差点因为这款该死的游戏而发布了同样的问题!然而我没有，因为我只是在谷歌上搜索boggle solver python，得到了我想要的所有答案。