“有没有什么论据可以帮助我说服他使用for循环是可以接受的?”

不，如果你的老板事无巨细地告诉你应该使用哪种编程语言结构，你就真的没什么可说的了。对不起。

我认为使用Parallel.ForEach()以及ConcurrentDictionary或ConcurrentBag会更快

下面是Parallel.ForEach()的例子

        var primeNumbers = new ConcurrentBag<T>();
        Parallel.ForEach(numbers, number =>
        {
            if (IsPrime(number))
            {
                primeNumbers.Add(number);
            }
        });

And

 var productImage = new ConcurrentDictionary<int,ResultModel>();
  Parallel.ForEach(pendingActiveImagesBatch, pictureItem =>
  {                           
     productImage.TryAdd(pictureItem.Id,pictureItem));
  });

引用平行。ForEach 参考ConcurrentDictionary最后

每种语言结构都有适当的使用时间和地点。c#语言有四个单独的迭代语句是有原因的——每个语句都有特定的目的，并且有适当的用法。

我建议你和你的老板坐下来，试着理性地解释为什么for循环有一个目的。有时for迭代块比foreach迭代块更清楚地描述算法。在这种情况下，使用它们是合适的。

我还要向你的老板指出——性能不是，也不应该是任何实际方式的问题——这更像是用简洁、有意义、可维护的方式表达算法的问题。这样的微优化完全忽略了性能优化的要点，因为任何真正的性能好处都来自算法重新设计和重构，而不是循环重构。

如果在理性的讨论之后，仍然有这种权威主义的观点，那就取决于你如何继续下去了。就我个人而言，我不会喜欢在一个不鼓励理性思考的环境中工作，我会考虑跳槽到另一个雇主手下。然而，我强烈建议在感到不安之前讨论一下——这可能只是一个简单的误解。

我发现foreach循环迭代列表更快。下面是我的测试结果。在下面的代码中，我分别迭代一个大小为100、10000和100000的数组，使用for和foreach循环来测量时间。

private static void MeasureTime()
    {
        var array = new int[10000];
        var list = array.ToList();
        Console.WriteLine("Array size: {0}", array.Length);

        Console.WriteLine("Array For loop ......");
        var stopWatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++)
        {
            Thread.Sleep(1);
        }
        stopWatch.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Time take to run the for loop is {0} millisecond", stopWatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);

        Console.WriteLine(" ");
        Console.WriteLine("Array Foreach loop ......");
        var stopWatch1 = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        foreach (var item in array)
        {
            Thread.Sleep(1);
        }
        stopWatch1.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Time take to run the foreach loop is {0} millisecond", stopWatch1.ElapsedMilliseconds);

        Console.WriteLine(" ");
        Console.WriteLine("List For loop ......");
        var stopWatch2 = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        for (int i = 0; i < list.Count; i++)
        {
            Thread.Sleep(1);
        }
        stopWatch2.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Time take to run the for loop is {0} millisecond", stopWatch2.ElapsedMilliseconds);

        Console.WriteLine(" ");
        Console.WriteLine("List Foreach loop ......");
        var stopWatch3 = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        foreach (var item in list)
        {
            Thread.Sleep(1);
        }
        stopWatch3.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Time take to run the foreach loop is {0} millisecond", stopWatch3.ElapsedMilliseconds);
    }

更新

在@jgauffin建议后，我使用了@johnskeet代码，发现使用数组的for循环比下面的更快，

Foreach循环与数组。 For带列表的循环。 Foreach循环与列表。

请看下面我的测试结果和代码，

private static void MeasureNewTime()
    {
        var data = new double[Size];
        var rng = new Random();
        for (int i = 0; i < data.Length; i++)
        {
            data[i] = rng.NextDouble();
        }
        Console.WriteLine("Lenght of array: {0}", data.Length);
        Console.WriteLine("No. of iteration: {0}", Iterations);
        Console.WriteLine(" ");
        double correctSum = data.Sum();

        Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
        {
            double sum = 0;
            for (int j = 0; j < data.Length; j++)
            {
                sum += data[j];
            }
            if (Math.Abs(sum - correctSum) > 0.1)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Summation failed");
                return;
            }
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("For loop with Array: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);

        sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        for (var i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
        {
            double sum = 0;
            foreach (double d in data)
            {
                sum += d;
            }
            if (Math.Abs(sum - correctSum) > 0.1)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Summation failed");
                return;
            }
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Foreach loop with Array: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
        Console.WriteLine(" ");

        var dataList = data.ToList();
        sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
        {
            double sum = 0;
            for (int j = 0; j < dataList.Count; j++)
            {
                sum += data[j];
            }
            if (Math.Abs(sum - correctSum) > 0.1)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Summation failed");
                return;
            }
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("For loop with List: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);

        sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
        for (int i = 0; i < Iterations; i++)
        {
            double sum = 0;
            foreach (double d in dataList)
            {
                sum += d;
            }
            if (Math.Abs(sum - correctSum) > 0.1)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Summation failed");
                return;
            }
        }
        sw.Stop();
        Console.WriteLine("Foreach loop with List: {0}", sw.ElapsedMilliseconds);
    }

Jeffrey Richter在techhed 2005上说:

"I have come to learn over the years the C# compiler is basically a liar to me." .. "It lies about many things." .. "Like when you do a foreach loop..." .. "...that is one little line of code that you write, but what the C# compiler spits out in order to do that it's phenomenal. It puts out a try/finally block in there, inside the finally block it casts your variable to an IDisposable interface, and if the cast suceeds it calls the Dispose method on it, inside the loop it calls the Current property and the MoveNext method repeatedly inside the loop, objects are being created underneath the covers. A lot of people use foreach because it's very easy coding, very easy to do.." .. "foreach is not very good in terms of performance, if you iterated over a collection instead by using square bracket notation, just doing index, that's just much faster, and it doesn't create any objects on the heap..."

按需网络直播: http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?EventID=1032292286&EventCategory=3&culture=en-US&CountryCode=US

我的猜测是，在99%的情况下，它可能并不重要，所以为什么要选择更快的，而不是最合适的(最容易理解/维护)?