将清单大致等份的最佳方法是什么?例如,如果列表有7个元素,并将其分为2部分,我们希望其中一部分有3个元素,而另一部分应该有4个元素。

我正在寻找类似even_split(L, n)的东西,它将L分解为n部分。

def chunks(L, n):
    """ Yield successive n-sized chunks from L.
    """
    for i in range(0, len(L), n):
        yield L[i:i+n]

上面的代码给出了3个块,而不是3个块。我可以简单地转置(遍历这个,取每列的第一个元素,称之为第一部分,然后取第二个元素,把它放在第二部分,等等),但这破坏了项目的顺序。


当前回答

这是另一种变体,它将“剩余”元素均匀地分布在所有块中,一次一个,直到一个都不剩。在这个实现中,较大的块出现在流程的开头。

def chunks(l, k):
  """ Yield k successive chunks from l."""
  if k < 1:
    yield []
    raise StopIteration
  n = len(l)
  avg = n/k
  remainders = n % k
  start, end = 0, avg
  while start < n:
    if remainders > 0:
      end = end + 1
      remainders = remainders - 1
    yield l[start:end]
    start, end = end, end+avg

例如,从14个元素的列表中生成4个块:

>>> list(chunks(range(14), 4))
[[0, 1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7], [8, 9, 10], [11, 12, 13]]
>>> map(len, list(chunks(range(14), 4)))
[4, 4, 3, 3]

其他回答

n = len(lst)
# p is the number of parts to be divided
x = int(n/p)

i = 0
j = x
lstt = []
while (i< len(lst) or j <len(lst)):
    lstt.append(lst[i:j])
    i+=x
    j+=x
print(lstt)

这是最简单的答案,如果已知列表分成相等的部分。

def chunk_array(array : List, n: int) -> List[List]:
    chunk_size = len(array) // n 
    chunks = []
    i = 0
    while i < len(array):
        # if less than chunk_size left add the remainder to last element
        if len(array) - (i + chunk_size + 1) < 0:
            chunks[-1].append(*array[i:i + chunk_size])
            break
        else:
            chunks.append(array[i:i + chunk_size])
            i += chunk_size
    return chunks

这是我的版本(灵感来自Max)

这里有一个生成器,可以处理任何正(整数)数量的块。如果块的数量大于输入列表的长度,一些块将为空。该算法在短块和长块之间交替,而不是将它们分开。

我还包含了一些用于测试ragged_chunks函数的代码。

''' Split a list into "ragged" chunks

    The size of each chunk is either the floor or ceiling of len(seq) / chunks

    chunks can be > len(seq), in which case there will be empty chunks

    Written by PM 2Ring 2017.03.30
'''

def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
    size = len(seq)
    start = 0
    for i in range(1, chunks + 1):
        stop = i * size // chunks
        yield seq[start:stop]
        start = stop

# test

def test_ragged_chunks(maxsize):
    for size in range(0, maxsize):
        seq = list(range(size))
        for chunks in range(1, size + 1):
            minwidth = size // chunks
            #ceiling division
            maxwidth = -(-size // chunks)
            a = list(ragged_chunks(seq, chunks))
            sizes = [len(u) for u in a]
            deltas = all(minwidth <= u <= maxwidth for u in sizes)
            assert all((sum(a, []) == seq, sum(sizes) == size, deltas))
    return True

if test_ragged_chunks(100):
    print('ok')

我们可以通过将乘法导出到range调用中来稍微提高效率,但我认为以前的版本更易于阅读(和dry)。

def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
    size = len(seq)
    start = 0
    for i in range(size, size * chunks + 1, size):
        stop = i // chunks
        yield seq[start:stop]
        start = stop

将代码更改为产生n个块,而不是n个块:

def chunks(l, n):
    """ Yield n successive chunks from l.
    """
    newn = int(len(l) / n)
    for i in xrange(0, n-1):
        yield l[i*newn:i*newn+newn]
    yield l[n*newn-newn:]

l = range(56)
three_chunks = chunks (l, 3)
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()

这使:

[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]
[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]

这将把额外的元素分配给最后一组,这并不完美,但在你的“大致N相等部分”的规范范围内:-)我的意思是,56个元素作为(19,19,18)会更好,而这给出(18,18,20)。

你可以用下面的代码得到更均衡的输出:

#!/usr/bin/python
def chunks(l, n):
    """ Yield n successive chunks from l.
    """
    newn = int(1.0 * len(l) / n + 0.5)
    for i in xrange(0, n-1):
        yield l[i*newn:i*newn+newn]
    yield l[n*newn-newn:]

l = range(56)
three_chunks = chunks (l, 3)
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()

输出:

[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]
[19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]
[38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]

这里有一个单独的函数,它处理了大多数不同的分裂情况:

def splitList(lst, into):
    '''Split a list into parts.

    :Parameters:
        into (str) = Split the list into parts defined by the following:
            '<n>parts' - Split the list into n parts.
                ex. 2 returns:  [[1, 2, 3, 5], [7, 8, 9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
            '<n>parts+' - Split the list into n equal parts with any trailing remainder.
                ex. 2 returns:  [[1, 2, 3], [5, 7, 8], [9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
            '<n>chunks' - Split into sublists of n size.
                ex. 2 returns: [[1,2], [3,5], [7,8], [9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
            'contiguous' - The list will be split by contiguous numerical values.
                ex. 'contiguous' returns: [[1,2,3], [5], [7,8,9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
            'range' - The values of 'contiguous' will be limited to the high and low end of each range.
                ex. 'range' returns: [[1,3], [5], [7,9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
    :Return:
        (list)
    '''
    from string import digits, ascii_letters, punctuation
    mode = into.lower().lstrip(digits)
    digit = into.strip(ascii_letters+punctuation)
    n = int(digit) if digit else None

    if n:
        if mode=='parts':
            n = len(lst)*-1 // n*-1 #ceil
        elif mode=='parts+':
            n = len(lst) // n
        return [lst[i:i+n] for i in range(0, len(lst), n)]

    elif mode=='contiguous' or mode=='range':
        from itertools import groupby
        from operator import itemgetter

        try:
            contiguous = [list(map(itemgetter(1), g)) for k, g in groupby(enumerate(lst), lambda x: int(x[0])-int(x[1]))]
        except ValueError as error:
            print ('{} in splitList\n   # Error: {} #\n {}'.format(__file__, error, lst))
            return lst
        if mode=='range':
            return [[i[0], i[-1]] if len(i)>1 else (i) for i in contiguous]
        return contiguous

r = splitList([1, '2', 3, 5, '7', 8, 9], into='2parts')
print (r) #returns: [[1, '2', 3, 5], ['7', 8, 9]]