我已经用c++做了一个程序，它是在联合和不联合图工作。

    #include <queue>
#include "iostream"
#include "vector"
#include "queue"

using namespace std;

struct Edge {
    int source,destination;
};

class Graph{
    int V;
    vector<vector<int>> adjList;
public:

    Graph(vector<Edge> edges,int V){
        this->V = V;
        adjList.resize(V);
        for(auto i : edges){
            adjList[i.source].push_back(i.destination);
            //     adjList[i.destination].push_back(i.source);
        }
    }
    void BFSRecursivelyJoinandDisjointtGraphUtil(vector<bool> &discovered, queue<int> &q);
    void BFSRecursivelyJointandDisjointGraph(int s);
    void printGraph();


};

void Graph :: printGraph()
{
    for (int i = 0; i < this->adjList.size(); i++)
    {
        cout << i << " -- ";
        for (int v : this->adjList[i])
            cout <<"->"<< v << " ";
        cout << endl;
    }
}


void Graph ::BFSRecursivelyJoinandDisjointtGraphUtil(vector<bool> &discovered, queue<int> &q) {
    if (q.empty())
        return;
    int v = q.front();
    q.pop();
    cout << v <<" ";
    for (int u : this->adjList[v])
    {
        if (!discovered[u])
        {
            discovered[u] = true;
            q.push(u);
        }
    }
    BFSRecursivelyJoinandDisjointtGraphUtil(discovered, q);

}

void Graph ::BFSRecursivelyJointandDisjointGraph(int s) {
    vector<bool> discovered(V, false);
    queue<int> q;

    for (int i = s; i < V; i++) {
        if (discovered[i] == false)
        {
            discovered[i] = true;
            q.push(i);
            BFSRecursivelyJoinandDisjointtGraphUtil(discovered, q);
        }
    }
}

int main()
{

    vector<Edge> edges =
            {
                    {0, 1}, {0, 2}, {1, 2}, {2, 0}, {2,3},{3,3}
            };

    int V = 4;
    Graph graph(edges, V);
 //   graph.printGraph();
    graph.BFSRecursivelyJointandDisjointGraph(2);
    cout << "\n";




    edges = {
            {0,4},{1,2},{1,3},{1,4},{2,3},{3,4}
    };

    Graph graph2(edges,5);

    graph2.BFSRecursivelyJointandDisjointGraph(0);
    return 0;
}

我想在上面的答案中加上我的观点，如果语言支持生成器之类的东西，bfs可以协递归地完成。

首先，@Tanzelax的回答是:

宽度优先遍历传统上使用队列，而不是堆栈。队列和堆栈的性质几乎是相反的，因此试图使用调用堆栈(因此得名为堆栈)作为辅助存储(队列)几乎是注定要失败的

实际上，普通函数调用的堆栈不会像普通堆栈那样运行。但是生成器函数将暂停函数的执行，因此它给了我们产生下一层节点的子节点的机会，而无需深入研究节点的更深层次的后代。

下面的代码是Python中的递归bfs。

def bfs(root):
  yield root
  for n in bfs(root):
    for c in n.children:
      yield c

这里的直觉是:

BFS首先将根作为第一个结果返回 假设我们已经有了BFS序列，BFS中的下一层元素是序列中前一个节点的直接子节点 重复以上两个步骤

(我假设这只是某种思维练习，或者甚至是一个恶作剧的家庭作业/面试问题，但是我想我可以想象一些奇怪的场景，由于某种原因不允许有任何堆空间[一些非常糟糕的自定义内存管理器?一些奇怪的运行时/操作系统问题?当你仍然可以访问堆栈时…)

宽度优先遍历传统上使用队列，而不是堆栈。队列和堆栈的性质几乎是相反的，因此试图使用调用堆栈(这是一个堆栈，因此得名)作为辅助存储(队列)几乎是注定要失败的，除非您对调用堆栈做了一些不应该做的愚蠢可笑的事情。

同样，您尝试实现的任何非尾递归本质上都是向算法添加堆栈。这使得它不再在二叉树上进行广度优先搜索，因此传统BFS的运行时和诸如此类的东西不再完全适用。当然，您总是可以简单地将任何循环转换为递归调用，但这并不是任何有意义的递归。

However, there are ways, as demonstrated by others, to implement something that follows the semantics of BFS at some cost. If the cost of comparison is expensive but node traversal is cheap, then as @Simon Buchan did, you can simply run an iterative depth-first search, only processing the leaves. This would mean no growing queue stored in the heap, just a local depth variable, and stacks being built up over and over on the call stack as the tree is traversed over and over again. And as @Patrick noted, a binary tree backed by an array is typically stored in breadth-first traversal order anyway, so a breadth-first search on that would be trivial, also without needing an auxiliary queue.

下面使用Haskell对我来说似乎很自然。在树的各个层次上递归迭代(这里我将名字收集到一个大的有序字符串中，以显示树的路径):

data Node = Node {name :: String, children :: [Node]}
aTree = Node "r" [Node "c1" [Node "gc1" [Node "ggc1" []], Node "gc2" []] , Node "c2" [Node "gc3" []], Node "c3" [] ]
breadthFirstOrder x = levelRecurser [x]
    where levelRecurser level = if length level == 0
                                then ""
                                else concat [name node ++ " " | node <- level] ++ levelRecurser (concat [children node | node <- level])

c#实现的递归宽度优先搜索二叉树算法。

二叉树数据可视化

IDictionary<string, string[]> graph = new Dictionary<string, string[]> {
    {"A", new [] {"B", "C"}},
    {"B", new [] {"D", "E"}},
    {"C", new [] {"F", "G"}},
    {"E", new [] {"H"}}
};

void Main()
{
    var pathFound = BreadthFirstSearch("A", "H", new string[0]);
    Console.WriteLine(pathFound); // [A, B, E, H]

    var pathNotFound = BreadthFirstSearch("A", "Z", new string[0]);
    Console.WriteLine(pathNotFound); // []
}

IEnumerable<string> BreadthFirstSearch(string start, string end, IEnumerable<string> path)
{
    if (start == end)
    {
        return path.Concat(new[] { end });
    }

    if (!graph.ContainsKey(start)) { return new string[0]; }    

    return graph[start].SelectMany(letter => BreadthFirstSearch(letter, end, path.Concat(new[] { start })));
}

如果你想让算法不仅适用于二叉树，而且适用于有两个或两个以上节点指向同一个节点的图，你必须通过持有已经访问过的节点列表来避免自循环。实现可能是这样的。

图形数据可视化

IDictionary<string, string[]> graph = new Dictionary<string, string[]> {
    {"A", new [] {"B", "C"}},
    {"B", new [] {"D", "E"}},
    {"C", new [] {"F", "G", "E"}},
    {"E", new [] {"H"}}
};

void Main()
{
    var pathFound = BreadthFirstSearch("A", "H", new string[0], new List<string>());
    Console.WriteLine(pathFound); // [A, B, E, H]

    var pathNotFound = BreadthFirstSearch("A", "Z", new string[0], new List<string>());
    Console.WriteLine(pathNotFound); // []
}

IEnumerable<string> BreadthFirstSearch(string start, string end, IEnumerable<string> path, IList<string> visited)
{
    if (start == end)
    {
        return path.Concat(new[] { end });
    }

    if (!graph.ContainsKey(start)) { return new string[0]; }


    return graph[start].Aggregate(new string[0], (acc, letter) =>
    {
        if (visited.Contains(letter))
        {
            return acc;
        }

        visited.Add(letter);

        var result = BreadthFirstSearch(letter, end, path.Concat(new[] { start }), visited);
        return acc.Concat(result).ToArray();
    });
}

Here is a JavaScript Implementation that fakes Breadth First Traversal with Depth First recursion. I'm storing the node values at each depth inside an array, inside of a hash. If a level already exists(we have a collision), so we just push to the array at that level. You could use an array instead of a JavaScript object as well since our levels are numeric and can serve as array indices. You can return nodes, values, convert to a Linked List, or whatever you want. I'm just returning values for the sake of simplicity.

BinarySearchTree.prototype.breadthFirstRec = function() {

    var levels = {};

    var traverse = function(current, depth) {
        if (!current) return null;
        if (!levels[depth]) levels[depth] = [current.value];
        else levels[depth].push(current.value);
        traverse(current.left, depth + 1);
        traverse(current.right, depth + 1);
    };

    traverse(this.root, 0);
    return levels;
};


var bst = new BinarySearchTree();
bst.add(20, 22, 8, 4, 12, 10, 14, 24);
console.log('Recursive Breadth First: ', bst.breadthFirstRec());
/*Recursive Breadth First:  
{ '0': [ 20 ],
  '1': [ 8, 22 ],
  '2': [ 4, 12, 24 ],
  '3': [ 10, 14 ] } */

下面是一个使用迭代方法的实际广度优先遍历的示例。

BinarySearchTree.prototype.breadthFirst = function() {

    var result = '',
        queue = [],
        current = this.root;

    if (!current) return null;
    queue.push(current);

    while (current = queue.shift()) {
        result += current.value + ' ';
        current.left && queue.push(current.left);
        current.right && queue.push(current.right);
    }
    return result;
};

console.log('Breadth First: ', bst.breadthFirst());
//Breadth First:  20 8 22 4 12 24 10 14