两个对象。assign和Object spread只做浅合并。
这个问题的一个例子:
// No object nesting
const x = { a: 1 }
const y = { b: 1 }
const z = { ...x, ...y } // { a: 1, b: 1 }
输出是您所期望的。然而，如果我尝试这样做:
// Object nesting
const x = { a: { a: 1 } }
const y = { a: { b: 1 } }
const z = { ...x, ...y } // { a: { b: 1 } }
而不是
{ a: { a: 1, b: 1 } }
你得到
{ a: { b: 1 } }
X被完全覆盖，因为扩展语法只覆盖了一层。这与Object.assign()相同。
有办法做到这一点吗?
当前回答
与减少
export const merge = (objFrom, objTo) => Object.keys(objFrom)
.reduce(
(merged, key) => {
merged[key] = objFrom[key] instanceof Object && !Array.isArray(objFrom[key])
? merge(objFrom[key], merged[key] ?? {})
: objFrom[key]
return merged
}, { ...objTo }
)
test('merge', async () => {
const obj1 = { par1: -1, par2: { par2_1: -21, par2_5: -25 }, arr: [0,1,2] }
const obj2 = { par1: 1, par2: { par2_1: 21 }, par3: 3, arr: [3,4,5] }
const obj3 = merge3(obj1, obj2)
expect(obj3).toEqual(
{ par1: -1, par2: { par2_1: -21, par2_5: -25 }, par3: 3, arr: [0,1,2] }
)
})
其他回答
如果您想合并多个普通对象(不要修改输入对象)。基于对象。分配polyfill
function isPlainObject(a) { return (!!a) && (a.constructor === Object); } function merge(target) { let to = Object.assign({}, target); for (let index = 1; index < arguments.length; index++) { let nextSource = arguments[index]; if (nextSource !== null && nextSource !== undefined) { for (let nextKey in nextSource) { // Avoid bugs when hasOwnProperty is shadowed if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(nextSource, nextKey)) { if (isPlainObject(to[nextKey]) && isPlainObject(nextSource[nextKey])) { to[nextKey] = merge(to[nextKey], nextSource[nextKey]); } else { to[nextKey] = nextSource[nextKey]; } } } } } return to; } // Usage var obj1 = { a: 1, b: { x: 2, y: { t: 3, u: 4 } }, c: "hi" }; var obj2 = { b: { x: 200, y: { u: 4000, v: 5000 } } }; var obj3 = { c: "hello" }; console.log("result", merge(obj1, obj2, obj3)); console.log("obj1", obj1); console.log("obj2", obj2); console.log("obj3", obj3);
如果你想合并有限的深度
function isPlainObject(a) { return (!!a) && (a.constructor === Object); } function merge(target) { let to = Object.assign({}, target); const hasDepth = arguments.length > 2 && typeof arguments[arguments.length - 1] === 'number'; const depth = hasDepth ? arguments[arguments.length - 1] : Infinity; const lastObjectIndex = hasDepth ? arguments.length - 2 : arguments.length - 1; for (let index = 1; index <= lastObjectIndex; index++) { let nextSource = arguments[index]; if (nextSource !== null && nextSource !== undefined) { for (let nextKey in nextSource) { // Avoid bugs when hasOwnProperty is shadowed if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(nextSource, nextKey)) { if (depth > 0 && isPlainObject(to[nextKey]) && isPlainObject(nextSource[nextKey])) { to[nextKey] = merge(to[nextKey], nextSource[nextKey], depth - 1); } else { to[nextKey] = nextSource[nextKey]; } } } } } return to; } // Usage var obj1 = { a: 1, b: { x: 2, y: { t: 3, u: 4, z: {zzz: 100} } }, c: "hi" }; var obj2 = { b: { y: { u: 4000, v: 5000, z: {} } } }; var obj3 = { c: "hello" }; console.log('deep 0', merge(obj1, obj2, obj3, 0)); console.log('deep 1', merge(obj1, obj2, obj3, 1)); console.log('deep 2', merge(obj1, obj2, obj3, 2)); console.log('deep 2', merge(obj1, obj2, obj3, 4));
这是我刚刚写的另一个支持数组的程序。它把它们连接起来。
function isObject(obj) {
return obj !== null && typeof obj === 'object';
}
function isPlainObject(obj) {
return isObject(obj) && (
obj.constructor === Object // obj = {}
|| obj.constructor === undefined // obj = Object.create(null)
);
}
function mergeDeep(target, ...sources) {
if (!sources.length) return target;
const source = sources.shift();
if(Array.isArray(target)) {
if(Array.isArray(source)) {
target.push(...source);
} else {
target.push(source);
}
} else if(isPlainObject(target)) {
if(isPlainObject(source)) {
for(let key of Object.keys(source)) {
if(!target[key]) {
target[key] = source[key];
} else {
mergeDeep(target[key], source[key]);
}
}
} else {
throw new Error(`Cannot merge object with non-object`);
}
} else {
target = source;
}
return mergeDeep(target, ...sources);
};
我知道这是一个老问题，但在ES2015/ES6中我能想到的最简单的解决方案实际上很简单，使用Object.assign()，
希望这能有所帮助:
/**
* Simple object check.
* @param item
* @returns {boolean}
*/
export function isObject(item) {
return (item && typeof item === 'object' && !Array.isArray(item));
}
/**
* Deep merge two objects.
* @param target
* @param ...sources
*/
export function mergeDeep(target, ...sources) {
if (!sources.length) return target;
const source = sources.shift();
if (isObject(target) && isObject(source)) {
for (const key in source) {
if (isObject(source[key])) {
if (!target[key]) Object.assign(target, { [key]: {} });
mergeDeep(target[key], source[key]);
} else {
Object.assign(target, { [key]: source[key] });
}
}
}
return mergeDeep(target, ...sources);
}
使用示例:
mergeDeep(this, { a: { b: { c: 123 } } });
// or
const merged = mergeDeep({a: 1}, { b : { c: { d: { e: 12345}}}});
console.dir(merged); // { a: 1, b: { c: { d: [Object] } } }
你将在下面的答案中找到一个不可更改的版本。
注意，这将导致循环引用上的无限递归。这里有一些关于如何检测循环引用的很好的答案，如果你认为你会面临这个问题。
我发现只有2行解决方案得到深度合并在javascript。一定要告诉我你的结果。
const obj1 = { a: { b: "c", x: "y" } }
const obj2 = { a: { b: "d", e: "f" } }
temp = Object.assign({}, obj1, obj2)
Object.keys(temp).forEach(key => {
temp[key] = (typeof temp[key] === 'object') ? Object.assign(temp[key], obj1[key], obj2[key]) : temp[key])
}
console.log(temp)
临时对象将打印{a: {b: 'd'， e: 'f'， x: 'y'}}
ES5的一个简单解决方案(覆盖现有值):
function merge(current, update) { Object.keys(update).forEach(function(key) { // if update[key] exist, and it's not a string or array, // we go in one level deeper if (current.hasOwnProperty(key) && typeof current[key] === 'object' && !(current[key] instanceof Array)) { merge(current[key], update[key]); // if update[key] doesn't exist in current, or it's a string // or array, then assign/overwrite current[key] to update[key] } else { current[key] = update[key]; } }); return current; } var x = { a: { a: 1 } } var y = { a: { b: 1 } } console.log(merge(x, y));
