有人知道深度合并在ES6/ES7规范中存在吗?

对象。赋值文档建议它不做深度克隆。

这里的大多数示例似乎太复杂了，我使用的是我创建的TypeScript中的一个，我认为它应该涵盖大多数情况(我将数组作为常规数据处理，只是替换它们)。

const isObject = (item: any) => typeof item === 'object' && !Array.isArray(item);

export const merge = <A = Object, B = Object>(target: A, source: B): A & B => {
  const isDeep = (prop: string) =>
    isObject(source[prop]) && target.hasOwnProperty(prop) && isObject(target[prop]);
  const replaced = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source)
    .map(prop => ({ [prop]: isDeep(prop) ? merge(target[prop], source[prop]) : source[prop] }))
    .reduce((a, b) => ({ ...a, ...b }), {});

  return {
    ...(target as Object),
    ...(replaced as Object)
  } as A & B;
};

在纯JS中也是如此，以防万一:

const isObject = item => typeof item === 'object' && !Array.isArray(item);

const merge = (target, source) => {
  const isDeep = prop => 
    isObject(source[prop]) && target.hasOwnProperty(prop) && isObject(target[prop]);
  const replaced = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source)
    .map(prop => ({ [prop]: isDeep(prop) ? merge(target[prop], source[prop]) : source[prop] }))
    .reduce((a, b) => ({ ...a, ...b }), {});

  return {
    ...target,
    ...replaced
  };
};

下面是我的测试用例，向您展示如何使用它

describe('merge', () => {
  context('shallow merges', () => {
    it('merges objects', () => {
      const a = { a: 'discard' };
      const b = { a: 'test' };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ a: 'test' });
    });
    it('extends objects', () => {
      const a = { a: 'test' };
      const b = { b: 'test' };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ a: 'test', b: 'test' });
    });
    it('extends a property with an object', () => {
      const a = { a: 'test' };
      const b = { b: { c: 'test' } };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ a: 'test', b: { c: 'test' } });
    });
    it('replaces a property with an object', () => {
      const a = { b: 'whatever', a: 'test' };
      const b = { b: { c: 'test' } };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ a: 'test', b: { c: 'test' } });
    });
  });

  context('deep merges', () => {
    it('merges objects', () => {
      const a = { test: { a: 'discard', b: 'test' }  };
      const b = { test: { a: 'test' } } ;
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ test: { a: 'test', b: 'test' } });
    });
    it('extends objects', () => {
      const a = { test: { a: 'test' } };
      const b = { test: { b: 'test' } };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ test: { a: 'test', b: 'test' } });
    });
    it('extends a property with an object', () => {
      const a = { test: { a: 'test' } };
      const b = { test: { b: { c: 'test' } } };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ test: { a: 'test', b: { c: 'test' } } });
    });
    it('replaces a property with an object', () => {
      const a = { test: { b: 'whatever', a: 'test' } };
      const b = { test: { b: { c: 'test' } } };
      expect(merge(a, b)).to.deep.equal({ test: { a: 'test', b: { c: 'test' } } });
    });
  });
});

如果你认为我缺少一些功能，请告诉我。

Ramda是一个很好的javascript函数库，它有mergeDeepLeft和mergeDeepRight。这些方法都能解决这个问题。请在这里查看文档:https://ramdajs.com/docs/#mergeDeepLeft

对于问题中的具体例子，我们可以使用:

import { mergeDeepLeft } from 'ramda'
const x = { a: { a: 1 } }
const y = { a: { b: 1 } }
const z = mergeDeepLeft(x, y)) // {"a":{"a":1,"b":1}}

用例:合并默认配置

如果我们以以下形式定义配置:

const defaultConf = {
    prop1: 'config1',
    prop2: 'config2'
}

我们可以这样定义更具体的配置:

const moreSpecificConf = {
    ...defaultConf,
    prop3: 'config3'
}

但是如果这些配置包含嵌套结构，这种方法就不再适用了。

因此，我写了一个函数，它只合并{key: value，…}并替换其余的。

const isObject = (val) => val === Object(val);

const merge = (...objects) =>
    objects.reduce(
        (obj1, obj2) => ({
            ...obj1,
            ...obj2,
            ...Object.keys(obj2)
                .filter((key) => key in obj1 && isObject(obj1[key]) && isObject(obj2[key]))
                .map((key) => ({[key]: merge(obj1[key], obj2[key])}))
                .reduce((n1, n2) => ({...n1, ...n2}), {})
        }),
        {}
    );

当涉及到宿主对象或比值包更复杂的任何类型的对象时，这个问题就不那么简单了

do you invoke a getter to obtain a value or do you copy over the property descriptor? what if the merge target has a setter (either own property or in its prototype chain)? Do you consider the value as already-present or call the setter to update the current value? do you invoke own-property functions or copy them over? What if they're bound functions or arrow functions depending on something in their scope chain at the time they were defined? what if it's something like a DOM node? You certainly don't want to treat it as simple object and just deep-merge all its properties over into how to deal with "simple" structures like arrays or maps or sets? Consider them already-present or merge them too? how to deal with non-enumerable own properties? what about new subtrees? Simply assign by reference or deep clone? how to deal with frozen/sealed/non-extensible objects?

另一件需要记住的事情是:包含循环的对象图。这通常不难处理——简单地保留一组已经访问过的源对象——但经常被遗忘。

您可能应该编写一个深度合并函数，它只期望原始值和简单对象(结构化克隆算法最多可以处理的那些类型)作为合并源。如果遇到它不能处理的东西，或者只是通过引用而不是深度合并进行赋值，则抛出。

换句话说，没有一种适合所有人的算法，您要么必须使用自己的算法，要么寻找恰好涵盖您的用例的库方法。

如果你正在使用ImmutableJS，你可以使用mergeDeep:

fromJS(options).mergeDeep(options2).toJS();