下面是TypeScript的实现:

export const mergeObjects = <T extends object = object>(target: T, ...sources: T[]): T  => {
  if (!sources.length) {
    return target;
  }
  const source = sources.shift();
  if (source === undefined) {
    return target;
  }

  if (isMergebleObject(target) && isMergebleObject(source)) {
    Object.keys(source).forEach(function(key: string) {
      if (isMergebleObject(source[key])) {
        if (!target[key]) {
          target[key] = {};
        }
        mergeObjects(target[key], source[key]);
      } else {
        target[key] = source[key];
      }
    });
  }

  return mergeObjects(target, ...sources);
};

const isObject = (item: any): boolean => {
  return item !== null && typeof item === 'object';
};

const isMergebleObject = (item): boolean => {
  return isObject(item) && !Array.isArray(item);
};

和单元测试:

describe('merge', () => {
  it('should merge Objects and all nested Ones', () => {
    const obj1 = { a: { a1: 'A1'}, c: 'C', d: {} };
    const obj2 = { a: { a2: 'A2'}, b: { b1: 'B1'}, d: null };
    const obj3 = { a: { a1: 'A1', a2: 'A2'}, b: { b1: 'B1'}, c: 'C', d: null};
    expect(mergeObjects({}, obj1, obj2)).toEqual(obj3);
  });
  it('should behave like Object.assign on the top level', () => {
    const obj1 = { a: { a1: 'A1'}, c: 'C'};
    const obj2 = { a: undefined, b: { b1: 'B1'}};
    expect(mergeObjects({}, obj1, obj2)).toEqual(Object.assign({}, obj1, obj2));
  });
  it('should not merge array values, just override', () => {
    const obj1 = {a: ['A', 'B']};
    const obj2 = {a: ['C'], b: ['D']};
    expect(mergeObjects({}, obj1, obj2)).toEqual({a: ['C'], b: ['D']});
  });
  it('typed merge', () => {
    expect(mergeObjects<TestPosition>(new TestPosition(0, 0), new TestPosition(1, 1)))
      .toEqual(new TestPosition(1, 1));
  });
});

class TestPosition {
  constructor(public x: number = 0, public y: number = 0) {/*empty*/}
}

2022年更新:

我创建mergician是为了满足评论中讨论的各种合并/克隆需求。它基于与我最初的答案相同的概念(如下)，但提供了可配置的选项:

Unlike native methods and other merge/clone utilities, Mergician provides advanced options for customizing the merge/clone process. These options make it easy to inspect, filter, and modify keys and properties; merge or skip unique, common, and universal keys (i.e., intersections, unions, and differences); and merge, sort, and remove duplicates from arrays. Property accessors and descriptors are also handled properly, ensuring that getter/setter functions are retained and descriptor values are defined on new merged/cloned objects.

值得注意的是，mergician比lodash等类似工具要小得多(1.5k min+gzip)。合并(5.1k min+gzip)。

GitHub: https://github.com/jhildenbiddle/mergician NPM: https://www.npmjs.com/package/mergician 文档:https://jhildenbiddle.github.io/mergician/

最初的回答:

由于这个问题仍然存在，这里有另一种方法:

ES6/2015 不可变(不修改原始对象) 处理数组(连接它们)

/** * Performs a deep merge of objects and returns new object. Does not modify * objects (immutable) and merges arrays via concatenation. * * @param {...object} objects - Objects to merge * @returns {object} New object with merged key/values */ function mergeDeep(...objects) { const isObject = obj => obj && typeof obj === 'object'; return objects.reduce((prev, obj) => { Object.keys(obj).forEach(key => { const pVal = prev[key]; const oVal = obj[key]; if (Array.isArray(pVal) && Array.isArray(oVal)) { prev[key] = pVal.concat(...oVal); } else if (isObject(pVal) && isObject(oVal)) { prev[key] = mergeDeep(pVal, oVal); } else { prev[key] = oVal; } }); return prev; }, {}); } // Test objects const obj1 = { a: 1, b: 1, c: { x: 1, y: 1 }, d: [ 1, 1 ] } const obj2 = { b: 2, c: { y: 2, z: 2 }, d: [ 2, 2 ], e: 2 } const obj3 = mergeDeep(obj1, obj2); // Out console.log(obj3);

function isObject(obj) {
    return obj !== null && typeof obj === 'object';
}
const isArray = Array.isArray;

function isPlainObject(obj) {
    return isObject(obj) && (
        obj.constructor === Object  // obj = {}
        || obj.constructor === undefined // obj = Object.create(null)
    );
}

function mergeDeep(target, ...sources){
    if (!sources.length) return target;
    const source = sources.shift();

    if (isPlainObject(source) || isArray(source)) {
        for (const key in source) {
            if (isPlainObject(source[key]) || isArray(source[key])) {
                if (isPlainObject(source[key]) && !isPlainObject(target[key])) {
                    target[key] = {};
                }else if (isArray(source[key]) && !isArray(target[key])) {
                    target[key] = [];
                }
                mergeDeep(target[key], source[key]);
            } else if (source[key] !== undefined && source[key] !== '') {
                target[key] = source[key];
            }
        }
    }

    return mergeDeep(target, ...sources);
}

// test...
var source = {b:333};
var source2 = {c:32, arr: [33,11]}
var n = mergeDeep({a:33}, source, source2);
source2.arr[1] = 22;
console.log(n.arr); // out: [33, 11]

这是一个廉价的深度合并，使用尽可能少的代码我能想到。当前一个属性存在时，每个源都会覆盖它。

const { keys } = Object;

const isObject = a => typeof a === "object" && !Array.isArray(a);
const merge = (a, b) =>
  isObject(a) && isObject(b)
    ? deepMerge(a, b)
    : isObject(a) && !isObject(b)
    ? a
    : b;

const coalesceByKey = source => (acc, key) =>
  (acc[key] && source[key]
    ? (acc[key] = merge(acc[key], source[key]))
    : (acc[key] = source[key])) && acc;

/**
 * Merge all sources into the target
 * overwriting primitive values in the the accumulated target as we go (if they already exist)
 * @param {*} target
 * @param  {...any} sources
 */
const deepMerge = (target, ...sources) =>
  sources.reduce(
    (acc, source) => keys(source).reduce(coalesceByKey(source), acc),
    target
  );

console.log(deepMerge({ a: 1 }, { a: 2 }));
console.log(deepMerge({ a: 1 }, { a: { b: 2 } }));
console.log(deepMerge({ a: { b: 2 } }, { a: 1 }));

你可以使用Lodash合并:

Var对象= { 'a': [{'b': 2}， {'d': 4}] }； Var other = { 'a': [{'c': 3}， {'e': 5}] }； console.log(_。合并(对象,其他)); / / = > {a: [{b: 2,“c”:3},{' d ': 4,“e”:5}]} < script src = " https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js " > < /脚本>

当涉及到宿主对象或比值包更复杂的任何类型的对象时，这个问题就不那么简单了

do you invoke a getter to obtain a value or do you copy over the property descriptor? what if the merge target has a setter (either own property or in its prototype chain)? Do you consider the value as already-present or call the setter to update the current value? do you invoke own-property functions or copy them over? What if they're bound functions or arrow functions depending on something in their scope chain at the time they were defined? what if it's something like a DOM node? You certainly don't want to treat it as simple object and just deep-merge all its properties over into how to deal with "simple" structures like arrays or maps or sets? Consider them already-present or merge them too? how to deal with non-enumerable own properties? what about new subtrees? Simply assign by reference or deep clone? how to deal with frozen/sealed/non-extensible objects?

另一件需要记住的事情是:包含循环的对象图。这通常不难处理——简单地保留一组已经访问过的源对象——但经常被遗忘。

您可能应该编写一个深度合并函数，它只期望原始值和简单对象(结构化克隆算法最多可以处理的那些类型)作为合并源。如果遇到它不能处理的东西，或者只是通过引用而不是深度合并进行赋值，则抛出。

换句话说，没有一种适合所有人的算法，您要么必须使用自己的算法，要么寻找恰好涵盖您的用例的库方法。