两个对象。assign和Object spread只做浅合并。
这个问题的一个例子:
// No object nesting
const x = { a: 1 }
const y = { b: 1 }
const z = { ...x, ...y } // { a: 1, b: 1 }
输出是您所期望的。然而，如果我尝试这样做:
// Object nesting
const x = { a: { a: 1 } }
const y = { a: { b: 1 } }
const z = { ...x, ...y } // { a: { b: 1 } }
而不是
{ a: { a: 1, b: 1 } }
你得到
{ a: { b: 1 } }
X被完全覆盖，因为扩展语法只覆盖了一层。这与Object.assign()相同。
有办法做到这一点吗?
当前回答
// copies all properties from source object to dest object recursively
export function recursivelyMoveProperties(source, dest) {
for (const prop in source) {
if (!source.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
continue;
}
if (source[prop] === null) {
// property is null
dest[prop] = source[prop];
continue;
}
if (typeof source[prop] === 'object') {
// if property is object let's dive into in
if (Array.isArray(source[prop])) {
dest[prop] = [];
} else {
if (!dest.hasOwnProperty(prop)
|| typeof dest[prop] !== 'object'
|| dest[prop] === null || Array.isArray(dest[prop])
|| !Object.keys(dest[prop]).length) {
dest[prop] = {};
}
}
recursivelyMoveProperties(source[prop], dest[prop]);
continue;
}
// property is simple type: string, number, e.t.c
dest[prop] = source[prop];
}
return dest;
}
单元测试:
describe('recursivelyMoveProperties', () => {
it('should copy properties correctly', () => {
const source: any = {
propS1: 'str1',
propS2: 'str2',
propN1: 1,
propN2: 2,
propA1: [1, 2, 3],
propA2: [],
propB1: true,
propB2: false,
propU1: null,
propU2: null,
propD1: undefined,
propD2: undefined,
propO1: {
subS1: 'sub11',
subS2: 'sub12',
subN1: 11,
subN2: 12,
subA1: [11, 12, 13],
subA2: [],
subB1: false,
subB2: true,
subU1: null,
subU2: null,
subD1: undefined,
subD2: undefined,
},
propO2: {
subS1: 'sub21',
subS2: 'sub22',
subN1: 21,
subN2: 22,
subA1: [21, 22, 23],
subA2: [],
subB1: false,
subB2: true,
subU1: null,
subU2: null,
subD1: undefined,
subD2: undefined,
},
};
let dest: any = {
propS2: 'str2',
propS3: 'str3',
propN2: -2,
propN3: 3,
propA2: [2, 2],
propA3: [3, 2, 1],
propB2: true,
propB3: false,
propU2: 'not null',
propU3: null,
propD2: 'defined',
propD3: undefined,
propO2: {
subS2: 'inv22',
subS3: 'sub23',
subN2: -22,
subN3: 23,
subA2: [5, 5, 5],
subA3: [31, 32, 33],
subB2: false,
subB3: true,
subU2: 'not null --- ',
subU3: null,
subD2: ' not undefined ----',
subD3: undefined,
},
propO3: {
subS1: 'sub31',
subS2: 'sub32',
subN1: 31,
subN2: 32,
subA1: [31, 32, 33],
subA2: [],
subB1: false,
subB2: true,
subU1: null,
subU2: null,
subD1: undefined,
subD2: undefined,
},
};
dest = recursivelyMoveProperties(source, dest);
expect(dest).toEqual({
propS1: 'str1',
propS2: 'str2',
propS3: 'str3',
propN1: 1,
propN2: 2,
propN3: 3,
propA1: [1, 2, 3],
propA2: [],
propA3: [3, 2, 1],
propB1: true,
propB2: false,
propB3: false,
propU1: null,
propU2: null,
propU3: null,
propD1: undefined,
propD2: undefined,
propD3: undefined,
propO1: {
subS1: 'sub11',
subS2: 'sub12',
subN1: 11,
subN2: 12,
subA1: [11, 12, 13],
subA2: [],
subB1: false,
subB2: true,
subU1: null,
subU2: null,
subD1: undefined,
subD2: undefined,
},
propO2: {
subS1: 'sub21',
subS2: 'sub22',
subS3: 'sub23',
subN1: 21,
subN2: 22,
subN3: 23,
subA1: [21, 22, 23],
subA2: [],
subA3: [31, 32, 33],
subB1: false,
subB2: true,
subB3: true,
subU1: null,
subU2: null,
subU3: null,
subD1: undefined,
subD2: undefined,
subD3: undefined,
},
propO3: {
subS1: 'sub31',
subS2: 'sub32',
subN1: 31,
subN2: 32,
subA1: [31, 32, 33],
subA2: [],
subB1: false,
subB2: true,
subU1: null,
subU2: null,
subD1: undefined,
subD2: undefined,
},
});
});
});
其他回答
如果你想要一个单行程序，而不需要像lodash那样庞大的库，我建议你使用deepmerge (npm install deepmerge)或deepmerge-ts (npm install deepmerge-ts)。
deepmerge也为TypeScript提供了类型，并且更加稳定(因为它比较老)，但是deepmerge-ts也可用于Deno，并且从设计上看更快，尽管顾名思义是用TypeScript编写的。
一旦导入就可以了
deepmerge({ a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 }, { a: 2, d: 3 });
得到
{ a: 2, b: 2, c: 3, d: 3 }
这对于复杂的对象和数组非常有效。这是一个真正的全面解决方案。
用例:合并默认配置
如果我们以以下形式定义配置:
const defaultConf = {
prop1: 'config1',
prop2: 'config2'
}
我们可以这样定义更具体的配置:
const moreSpecificConf = {
...defaultConf,
prop3: 'config3'
}
但是如果这些配置包含嵌套结构，这种方法就不再适用了。
因此，我写了一个函数，它只合并{key: value，…}并替换其余的。
const isObject = (val) => val === Object(val);
const merge = (...objects) =>
objects.reduce(
(obj1, obj2) => ({
...obj1,
...obj2,
...Object.keys(obj2)
.filter((key) => key in obj1 && isObject(obj1[key]) && isObject(obj2[key]))
.map((key) => ({[key]: merge(obj1[key], obj2[key])}))
.reduce((n1, n2) => ({...n1, ...n2}), {})
}),
{}
);
使用这个函数:
merge(target, source, mutable = false) {
const newObj = typeof target == 'object' ? (mutable ? target : Object.assign({}, target)) : {};
for (const prop in source) {
if (target[prop] == null || typeof target[prop] === 'undefined') {
newObj[prop] = source[prop];
} else if (Array.isArray(target[prop])) {
newObj[prop] = source[prop] || target[prop];
} else if (target[prop] instanceof RegExp) {
newObj[prop] = source[prop] || target[prop];
} else {
newObj[prop] = typeof source[prop] === 'object' ? this.merge(target[prop], source[prop]) : source[prop];
}
}
return newObj;
}
https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.15#defaultsDeep
注意:此方法会使源发生突变。
_.defaultsDeep({ 'a': { 'b': 2 } }, { 'a': { 'b': 1, 'c': 3 } });
// => { 'a': { 'b': 2, 'c': 3 } }
我发现只有2行解决方案得到深度合并在javascript。一定要告诉我你的结果。
const obj1 = { a: { b: "c", x: "y" } }
const obj2 = { a: { b: "d", e: "f" } }
temp = Object.assign({}, obj1, obj2)
Object.keys(temp).forEach(key => {
temp[key] = (typeof temp[key] === 'object') ? Object.assign(temp[key], obj1[key], obj2[key]) : temp[key])
}
console.log(temp)
临时对象将打印{a: {b: 'd'， e: 'f'， x: 'y'}}
