x = type('new_dict', (object,), d)

然后再加上递归，就完成了。

编辑这是我如何实现它:

>>> d
{'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ['hi', {'foo': 'bar'}]}
>>> def obj_dic(d):
    top = type('new', (object,), d)
    seqs = tuple, list, set, frozenset
    for i, j in d.items():
        if isinstance(j, dict):
            setattr(top, i, obj_dic(j))
        elif isinstance(j, seqs):
            setattr(top, i, 
                type(j)(obj_dic(sj) if isinstance(sj, dict) else sj for sj in j))
        else:
            setattr(top, i, j)
    return top

>>> x = obj_dic(d)
>>> x.a
1
>>> x.b.c
2
>>> x.d[1].foo
'bar'

这是另一种将字典列表转换为对象的替代方法:

def dict2object(in_dict):
    class Struct(object):
        def __init__(self, in_dict):
            for key, value in in_dict.items():
                if isinstance(value, (list, tuple)):
                    setattr(
                        self, key,
                        [Struct(sub_dict) if isinstance(sub_dict, dict)
                         else sub_dict for sub_dict in value])
                else:
                    setattr(
                        self, key,
                        Struct(value) if isinstance(value, dict)
                        else value)
    return [Struct(sub_dict) for sub_dict in in_dict] \
        if isinstance(in_dict, list) else Struct(in_dict)

我偶然发现的情况下，我需要递归转换字典列表到对象列表，所以基于罗伯托的片段在这里为我做了什么工作:

def dict2obj(d):
    if isinstance(d, dict):
        n = {}
        for item in d:
            if isinstance(d[item], dict):
                n[item] = dict2obj(d[item])
            elif isinstance(d[item], (list, tuple)):
                n[item] = [dict2obj(elem) for elem in d[item]]
            else:
                n[item] = d[item]
        return type('obj_from_dict', (object,), n)
    elif isinstance(d, (list, tuple,)):
        l = []
        for item in d:
            l.append(dict2obj(item))
        return l
    else:
        return d

注意，由于显而易见的原因，任何元组都将被转换为与其列表相当的元素。

希望这能像你们的答案对我一样帮助到别人。

如果只是将dict赋值给一个空对象的__dict__呢?

class Object:
    """If your dict is "flat", this is a simple way to create an object from a dict

    >>> obj = Object()
    >>> obj.__dict__ = d
    >>> d.a
    1
    """
    pass

当然，这在你嵌套的dict例子上失败了，除非你递归地遍历dict:

# For a nested dict, you need to recursively update __dict__
def dict2obj(d):
    """Convert a dict to an object

    >>> d = {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ["hi", {'foo': "bar"}]}
    >>> obj = dict2obj(d)
    >>> obj.b.c
    2
    >>> obj.d
    ["hi", {'foo': "bar"}]
    """
    try:
        d = dict(d)
    except (TypeError, ValueError):
        return d
    obj = Object()
    for k, v in d.iteritems():
        obj.__dict__[k] = dict2obj(v)
    return obj

你的例子列表元素可能是一个映射，一个(键，值)对的列表，像这样:

>>> d = {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': [("hi", {'foo': "bar"})]}
>>> obj = dict2obj(d)
>>> obj.d.hi.foo
"bar"

在2021年，使用pydantic BaseModel -将嵌套字典和嵌套json对象转换为python对象，反之亦然:

https://pydantic-docs.helpmanual.io/usage/models/

>>> class Foo(BaseModel):
...     count: int
...     size: float = None
... 
>>> 
>>> class Bar(BaseModel):
...     apple = 'x'
...     banana = 'y'
... 
>>> 
>>> class Spam(BaseModel):
...     foo: Foo
...     bars: List[Bar]
... 
>>> 
>>> m = Spam(foo={'count': 4}, bars=[{'apple': 'x1'}, {'apple': 'x2'}])

对象to dict

>>> print(m.dict())
{'foo': {'count': 4, 'size': None}, 'bars': [{'apple': 'x1', 'banana': 'y'}, {'apple': 'x2', 'banana': 'y'}]}

对象转换为JSON

>>> print(m.json())
{"foo": {"count": 4, "size": null}, "bars": [{"apple": "x1", "banana": "y"}, {"apple": "x2", "banana": "y"}]}

反对的词典

>>> spam = Spam.parse_obj({'foo': {'count': 4, 'size': None}, 'bars': [{'apple': 'x1', 'banana': 'y'}, {'apple': 'x2', 'banana': 'y2'}]})
>>> spam
Spam(foo=Foo(count=4, size=None), bars=[Bar(apple='x1', banana='y'), Bar(apple='x2', banana='y2')])

JSON到对象

>>> spam = Spam.parse_raw('{"foo": {"count": 4, "size": null}, "bars": [{"apple": "x1", "banana": "y"}, {"apple": "x2", "banana": "y"}]}')
>>> spam
Spam(foo=Foo(count=4, size=None), bars=[Bar(apple='x1', banana='y'), Bar(apple='x2', banana='y')])

为dict寻找一个简单的包装器类，支持属性样式的键访问/赋值(点表示法)，我对现有选项不满意，原因如下。

数据类、pydantic等都很棒，但需要对内容进行静态定义。此外，它们不能在依赖dict的代码中替换dict，因为它们不共享相同的方法，并且不支持__getitem__()语法。

因此，我开发了MetaDict。它的行为完全类似于dict，但支持点表示法和IDE自动补全(如果对象被加载到RAM中)，而没有其他解决方案的缺点和潜在的名称空间冲突。所有功能和使用示例都可以在GitHub上找到(见上面的链接)。

完全披露:我是MetaDict的作者。

我在尝试其他解决方案时遇到的缺点/限制:

Addict No key autocompletion in IDE Nested key assignment cannot be turned off Newly assigned dict objects are not converted to support attribute-style key access Shadows inbuilt type Dict Prodict No key autocompletion in IDE without defining a static schema (similar to dataclass) No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables AttrDict No key autocompletion in IDE Converts list objects to tuple behind the scenes Munch Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables EasyDict Only strings are valid keys, but dict accepts all hashable objects as keys Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] Inbuilt methods don't behave as expected: obj.pop('unknown_key', None) raises an AttributeError

注意:我在这个stackoverflow中写了一个类似的答案，这是相关的。