为什么不两者都用呢?在Cygwin中调用PowerShell脚本，就像其他解释性脚本(如Perl)一样。

为此，我编写了https://bitbucket.org/jbianchi/powershell，以便Bash包装器在Cygwin中调用powershell.exe。它可以用作PowerShell .exe .ps1脚本的第一行shebang(因为PowerShell也使用“#”作为注释)。参见https://bitbucket.org/jbianchi/powershell/wiki/Home获取示例

我直到最近才开始认真地接触PowerShell。尽管在过去的7年里，我一直在一个几乎完全基于Windows的环境中工作，但我有Unix背景，我发现自己一直在努力将我在Windows上的交互体验“Unix化”。至少可以说，这令人沮丧。

将PowerShell与Bash、tcsh或zsh这样的东西进行比较是公平的，因为grep、sed、awk、find等实用程序严格来说都不是shell的一部分;然而，它们将永远是任何Unix环境的一部分。也就是说，像Select-String这样的PowerShell命令具有与grep非常相似的功能，并且被捆绑为PowerShell的核心模块…所以界限可能有点模糊。

我认为最关键的是文化，而事实上，各自的工具集将体现各自的文化:

Unix is a file-based, (in general, non Unicode) text-based culture. Configuration files are almost exclusively text files. Windows, on the other hand has always been far more structured in respect of configuration formats--configurations are generally kept in proprietary databases (e.g., the Windows registry) which require specialised tools for their management. The Unix administrative (and, for many years, development) interface has traditionally been the command line and the virtual terminal. Windows started off as a GUI and administrative functions have only recently started moving away from being exclusively GUI-based. We can expect the Unix experience on the command line to be a richer, more mature one given the significant lead it has on PowerShell, and my experience matches this. On this, in my experience: The Unix administrative experience is geared towards making things easy to do in a minimal amount of key strokes; this is probably as a result of the historical situation of having to administer a server over a slow 9600 baud dial-up connection. Now PowerShell does have aliases which go a long way to getting around the rather verbose Verb-Noun standard, but getting to know those aliases is a bit of a pain (anyone know of something better than: alias | where {$_.ResolvedCommandName -eq "<command>"}?). An example of the rich way in which history can be manipulated: iptables commands are often long-winded and repeating them with slight differences would be a pain if it weren't for just one of many neat features of history manipulation built into Bash, so inserting an iptables rule like the following: iptables -I camera-1-internet -s 192.168.0.50 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT a second time for another camera ("camera-2"), is just a case of issuing: !!:s/-1-/-2-/:s/50/51 which means "perform the previous command, but substitute -1- with -2- and 50 with 51. The Unix experience is optimised for touch-typists; one can pretty much do everything without leaving the "home" position. For example, in Bash, using the Emacs key bindings (yes, Bash also supports vi bindings), cycling through the history is done using Ctrl-P and Ctrl-N whilst moving to the start and end of a line is done using Ctrl-A and Ctrl-E respectively ... and it definitely doesn't end there. Try even the simplest of navigation in the PowerShell console without moving from the home position and you're in trouble. Simple things like versatile paging (a la less) on Unix don't seem to be available out-of-the-box in PowerShell which is a little frustrating, and a rich editor experience doesn't exist either. Of course, one can always download third-party tools that will fill those gaps, but it sure would be nice if these things were just "there" like they are on pretty much any flavour of Unix. The Windows culture, at least in terms of system API's is largely driven by the supporting frameworks, viz., COM and .NET, both of-which are highly structured and object-based. On the other hand, access to Unix APIs has traditionally been through a file interface (/dev and /proc) or (non-object-oriented) C-style library calls. It's no surprise then that the scripting experiences match their respective OS paradigms. PowerShell is by nature structured (everything is an object) and Bash-and-friends file-based. The structured API which is at the disposal of a PowerShell programmer is vast (essentially matching the vastness of the existing set of standard COM and .NET interfaces).

简而言之，尽管PowerShell的脚本功能可以说比Bash更强大(特别是当您考虑到. net BCL的可用性时)，但交互体验明显较弱，特别是如果您从完全由键盘驱动、基于控制台的角度(就像许多unix用户一样)进行交互时。

我还没有看到PowerShell真正流行起来，至少现在还没有。因此，除非团队中的其他人已经知道它，否则学习它可能不值得。

对于您的困境，您最好使用其他人可以支持的脚本语言，如您提到的Perl或Ruby或Python。

我认为这在很大程度上取决于你需要做什么。就我个人而言，我一直在为自己的个人脚本使用Python，但我知道当我开始编写一些东西时，我永远无法将其传递下去——所以我尽量不做任何太有革命性的事情。

PowerShell功能非常强大，比Unix shell的标准内置功能更强大(但这只是因为它包含了许多通常分配给子程序的功能)。另外，考虑到你可以用任何。net语言编写小程序，包括IronPython、IronRuby、PerlNet等。或者你可以简单地从PowerShell调用你的Cygwin命令，忽略所有额外的功能，它将类似于Bash, KornShell，或任何…

为什么不两者都用呢?在Cygwin中调用PowerShell脚本，就像其他解释性脚本(如Perl)一样。

为此，我编写了https://bitbucket.org/jbianchi/powershell，以便Bash包装器在Cygwin中调用powershell.exe。它可以用作PowerShell .exe .ps1脚本的第一行shebang(因为PowerShell也使用“#”作为注释)。参见https://bitbucket.org/jbianchi/powershell/wiki/Home获取示例

TL;DR——我不讨厌Windows或PowerShell。我在Windows或PowerShell上什么都做不了。

我个人仍然觉得PowerShell充其量只能说是平淡无奇。

tab completion of directory paths do not compound, requiring the user to enter a path separator after every name completion. I still feel like Windows doesn't even have the concept of a path or of what a path is, with no accessible user home indicator ~/ short of some @environment://somejibberish/%user_home% NTFS is still a mess and seemingly always will be. Good luck navigating. cmd-esque interface, The dinosaur cmd.exe is still visible in PowerShell, Edit → Mark still being the only way to copy information, and copying only in the form of rectangular blocks of visible terminal space. and Edit → Mark still being the only way to paste strings into the terminal. Painting it blue doesn't make it any more attractive. I don't mind Microsoft developers having a taste in color though. Windows always opens at top left corner of screen. For somebody who uses vertical task bars this is incredibly annoying, especially considering that the Windows task bar will cover the only corner of the window that gives access to copy/paste functionality.

关于Windows包含的工具，我不能说太多。由于有一整套开源的、免费授权的CLI工具，而且PowerShell附带了这些工具，据我所知，没有一个是完全令人失望的。

PowerShell的wget的参数似乎与GNU的wget无法相比。谢谢，希望之光便携无用。 PowerShell POSIX与bash不兼容，特别是&&运算符没有被处理，使得最简单的条件命令也不能跟在后面。

我不了解人类;我试过了，真的;我仍然试着给它一个机会，希望下次我打开它的时候，它不会那么无用。我不能在PowerShell中做任何事情，我也几乎不能在真正的项目中将GNU工具引入Windows。

MySysGit为我提供了带有几个GNU工具的陈旧cmd.exe提示符，它仍然非常令人印象深刻，但最终路径补全工作了。Git命令将在Git Bash中运行。

Mintty for MySysGit为MySysGit的环境提供了Cygwin界面，使复制和粘贴一个东西(选择复制(鼠标)，Shift+Ins粘贴，多么现代…)然而，像git push这样的东西在Mintty中被破坏了。

我并不是要抱怨，但我仍然看到Windows上命令行可用性的巨大问题，即使使用了Cygwin这样的工具。

注:仅仅因为在PowerShell中可以做一些事情，并不意味着它就可用。可用性比能力更重要，这也是我作为消费者在使用产品时所关注的问题。