我得到以下警告:

(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.
Trace: 
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (events.js:139:15)
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (node.js:385:29)
    at Server.<anonymous> (server.js:20:17)
    at Server.emit (events.js:70:17)
    at HTTPParser.onIncoming (http.js:1514:12)
    at HTTPParser.onHeadersComplete (http.js:102:31)
    at Socket.ondata (http.js:1410:22)
    at TCP.onread (net.js:354:27)

我在server.js中写了这样的代码:

http.createServer(
    function (req, res) { ... }).listen(3013);

如何解决这个问题?


当前回答

有时,这些警告发生在我们没有做过的事情,而是我们忘记做的事情!

当我用npm安装dotenv包时遇到了这个警告,但在我在应用程序开始添加require('dotenv').load()语句之前就被打断了。当我回到项目时,我开始得到“可能的EventEmitter内存泄漏检测到”警告。

我以为问题出在我做了什么,而不是我没做什么!

一旦我发现了我的疏忽并添加了require语句,内存泄漏警告就清除了。

其他回答

将.on()替换为once()。使用once()在同一函数处理事件时删除事件监听器。

如果这不能解决问题,那么在package.json中重新安装restler :“restler git: / / github.com/danwrong/restler.git # 9 d455ff14c57ddbe263dbbcd0289d76413bfe07d”

这与restler 0.10对node的错误行为有关。你可以在这里看到git关闭的问题:https://github.com/danwrong/restler/issues/112 然而,npm还没有更新这个,所以这就是为什么你必须引用git头。

节点版本号:v11.10.1

来自堆栈跟踪的警告消息:

process.on('warning', e => console.warn(e.stack));
(node:17905) MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
    at _addListener (events.js:255:17)
    at Connection.addListener (events.js:271:10)
    at Connection.Readable.on (_stream_readable.js:826:35)
    at Connection.once (events.js:300:8)
    at Connection._send (/var/www/html/fleet-node-api/node_modules/http2/lib/protocol/connection.js:355:10)
    at processImmediate (timers.js:637:19)
    at process.topLevelDomainCallback (domain.js:126:23)

在搜索github问题,文档和创建类似的事件发射器内存泄漏后,由于node-apn模块用于iOS推送通知,观察到此问题。

这就解决了问题:

您应该为每个进程只创建一个Provider 您拥有的证书/密钥对。您不需要创建一个新的 每个通知的提供者。如果你只是发送通知 一个应用程序,那么就不需要一个以上的提供商。 如果你经常在你的应用程序中创建Provider实例,make 当你使用完每个提供者时,一定要调用provider .shutdown() 释放其资源和内存。

每次发送通知时,我都在创建提供者对象,并期望gc将其清除。

You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');

I prefer to hunt down and fix problems instead of suppressing logs whenever possible. After a couple days of observing this issue in my app, I realized I was setting listeners on the req.socket in an Express middleware to catch socket io errors that kept popping up. At some point, I learned that that was not necessary, but I kept the listeners around anyway. I just removed them and the error you are experiencing went away. I verified it was the cause by running requests to my server with and without the following middleware:

socketEventsHandler(req, res, next) {
        req.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------REQ ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        res.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------RES ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        next();
    }

删除该中间件将停止您所看到的警告。我会查看您的代码,并尝试找到您可能设置了不需要的侦听器的任何地方。

直到今天我开始监视咕噜咕噜的时候,我才开始这样做。最终由

watch: {
  options: {
    maxListeners: 99,
    livereload: true
  },
}

烦人的信息消失了。