我得到以下警告:

(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.
Trace: 
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (events.js:139:15)
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (node.js:385:29)
    at Server.<anonymous> (server.js:20:17)
    at Server.emit (events.js:70:17)
    at HTTPParser.onIncoming (http.js:1514:12)
    at HTTPParser.onHeadersComplete (http.js:102:31)
    at Socket.ondata (http.js:1410:22)
    at TCP.onread (net.js:354:27)

我在server.js中写了这样的代码:

http.createServer(
    function (req, res) { ... }).listen(3013);

如何解决这个问题?


当前回答

添加EventEmitter.defaultMaxListeners = <MaxNumberOfClients>到node_modules\loop -datasource-juggler\lib\datasource.js修复了可能的问题:)

其他回答

I prefer to hunt down and fix problems instead of suppressing logs whenever possible. After a couple days of observing this issue in my app, I realized I was setting listeners on the req.socket in an Express middleware to catch socket io errors that kept popping up. At some point, I learned that that was not necessary, but I kept the listeners around anyway. I just removed them and the error you are experiencing went away. I verified it was the cause by running requests to my server with and without the following middleware:

socketEventsHandler(req, res, next) {
        req.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------REQ ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        res.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------RES ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        next();
    }

删除该中间件将停止您所看到的警告。我会查看您的代码,并尝试找到您可能设置了不需要的侦听器的任何地方。

直到今天我开始监视咕噜咕噜的时候,我才开始这样做。最终由

watch: {
  options: {
    maxListeners: 99,
    livereload: true
  },
}

烦人的信息消失了。

节点版本号:v11.10.1

来自堆栈跟踪的警告消息:

process.on('warning', e => console.warn(e.stack));
(node:17905) MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
    at _addListener (events.js:255:17)
    at Connection.addListener (events.js:271:10)
    at Connection.Readable.on (_stream_readable.js:826:35)
    at Connection.once (events.js:300:8)
    at Connection._send (/var/www/html/fleet-node-api/node_modules/http2/lib/protocol/connection.js:355:10)
    at processImmediate (timers.js:637:19)
    at process.topLevelDomainCallback (domain.js:126:23)

在搜索github问题,文档和创建类似的事件发射器内存泄漏后,由于node-apn模块用于iOS推送通知,观察到此问题。

这就解决了问题:

您应该为每个进程只创建一个Provider 您拥有的证书/密钥对。您不需要创建一个新的 每个通知的提供者。如果你只是发送通知 一个应用程序,那么就不需要一个以上的提供商。 如果你经常在你的应用程序中创建Provider实例,make 当你使用完每个提供者时,一定要调用provider .shutdown() 释放其资源和内存。

每次发送通知时,我都在创建提供者对象,并期望gc将其清除。

这在节点eventEmitter文档中有解释

这是什么版本的Node ?你还有其他代码吗?这不是正常的行为。

简而言之,它:process.setMaxListeners(0);

另见:node.js - request -如何“emitter.setMaxListeners()”?

我也面临着同样的问题,但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }