我得到以下警告:

(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.
Trace: 
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (events.js:139:15)
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (node.js:385:29)
    at Server.<anonymous> (server.js:20:17)
    at Server.emit (events.js:70:17)
    at HTTPParser.onIncoming (http.js:1514:12)
    at HTTPParser.onHeadersComplete (http.js:102:31)
    at Socket.ondata (http.js:1410:22)
    at TCP.onread (net.js:354:27)

我在server.js中写了这样的代码:

http.createServer(
    function (req, res) { ... }).listen(3013);

如何解决这个问题?


当前回答

把它放在你的server.js(或任何包含你的主Node.js应用程序)的第一行:

需要.EventEmitter.prototype(“事件”)。_maxListeners = 0;

错误就消失了:)

其他回答

直到今天我开始监视咕噜咕噜的时候,我才开始这样做。最终由

watch: {
  options: {
    maxListeners: 99,
    livereload: true
  },
}

烦人的信息消失了。

把它放在你的server.js(或任何包含你的主Node.js应用程序)的第一行:

需要.EventEmitter.prototype(“事件”)。_maxListeners = 0;

错误就消失了:)

在我的例子中,它是child.stderr.pipe(process.stderr),当我启动10个(或左右)child实例时,它被调用。因此,任何导致在LOOP中将事件处理程序附加到同一个EventEmitter对象的事情都会导致nodejs抛出这个错误。

我想在这里指出,这个警告是有原因的,正确的解决方法很可能不是增加限制,而是弄清楚为什么要向同一个事件添加如此多的侦听器。只有当您知道为什么要添加这么多侦听器并且确信这是您真正想要的时候,才增加限制。

我找到了这个页面,因为我得到了这个警告,在我的情况下,我正在使用的一些代码中有一个错误,将全局对象转换为EventEmitter!我当然不建议在全球范围内增加限制,因为你不想让这些事情被忽视。

You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');