I prefer to hunt down and fix problems instead of suppressing logs whenever possible. After a couple days of observing this issue in my app, I realized I was setting listeners on the req.socket in an Express middleware to catch socket io errors that kept popping up. At some point, I learned that that was not necessary, but I kept the listeners around anyway. I just removed them and the error you are experiencing went away. I verified it was the cause by running requests to my server with and without the following middleware:

socketEventsHandler(req, res, next) {
        req.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------REQ ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        res.socket.on("error", function(err) {
            console.error('------RES ERROR')
            console.error(err.stack)
        });
        next();
    }

删除该中间件将停止您所看到的警告。我会查看您的代码，并尝试找到您可能设置了不需要的侦听器的任何地方。

有时，这些警告发生在我们没有做过的事情，而是我们忘记做的事情!

当我用npm安装dotenv包时遇到了这个警告，但在我在应用程序开始添加require('dotenv').load()语句之前就被打断了。当我回到项目时，我开始得到“可能的EventEmitter内存泄漏检测到”警告。

我以为问题出在我做了什么，而不是我没做什么!

一旦我发现了我的疏忽并添加了require语句，内存泄漏警告就清除了。

公认的答案提供了如何增加限制的语义，但正如@voltrevo指出的那样，警告是有原因的，您的代码可能存在错误。

考虑以下有bug的代码:

//Assume Logger is a module that emits errors
var Logger = require('./Logger.js');

for (var i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
    //BUG: This will cause the warning
    //As the event listener is added in a loop
    Logger.on('error', function (err) {
        console.log('error writing log: ' + err)
    });

    Logger.writeLog('Hello');
}

现在观察添加监听器的正确方法:

//Good: event listener is not in a loop
Logger.on('error', function (err) {
    console.log('error writing log: ' + err)
});

for (var i = 0; i < 11; i++) {
    Logger.writeLog('Hello');
}

在更改maxListeners之前搜索代码中的类似问题(在其他答案中有解释)

我想在这里指出，这个警告是有原因的，正确的解决方法很可能不是增加限制，而是弄清楚为什么要向同一个事件添加如此多的侦听器。只有当您知道为什么要添加这么多侦听器并且确信这是您真正想要的时候，才增加限制。

我找到了这个页面，因为我得到了这个警告，在我的情况下，我正在使用的一些代码中有一个错误，将全局对象转换为EventEmitter!我当然不建议在全球范围内增加限制，因为你不想让这些事情被忽视。

我也面临着同样的问题，但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }

You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');