基于以前的答案

const groupBy = (prop) => (xs) =>
  xs.reduce((rv, x) =>
    Object.assign(rv, {[x[prop]]: [...(rv[x[prop]] || []), x]}), {});

如果您的环境支持，使用对象扩展语法会更好一些。

const groupBy = (prop) => (xs) =>
  xs.reduce((acc, x) => ({
    ...acc,
    [ x[ prop ] ]: [...( acc[ x[ prop ] ] || []), x],
  }), {});

在这里，我们的reducer接受部分形成的返回值（从一个空对象开始），并返回一个由上一个返回值的展开成员组成的对象，以及一个新成员，该成员的键是从prop处的当前iteree值计算的，其值是该prop的所有值以及当前值的列表。

使用linq.js可能更容易做到这一点，它是linq在JavaScript（DEMO）中的真正实现：

var linq = Enumerable.From(data);
var result =
    linq.GroupBy(function(x){ return x.Phase; })
        .Select(function(x){
          return {
            Phase: x.Key(),
            Value: x.Sum(function(y){ return y.Value|0; })
          };
        }).ToArray();

结果：

[
    { Phase: "Phase 1", Value: 50 },
    { Phase: "Phase 2", Value: 130 }
]

或者，更简单地使用基于字符串的选择器（DEMO）：

linq.GroupBy("$.Phase", "",
    "k,e => { Phase:k, Value:e.Sum('$.Value|0') }").ToArray();

使用lodash库很简单

let temp = []
  _.map(yourCollectionData, (row) => {
    let index = _.findIndex(temp, { 'Phase': row.Phase })
    if (index > -1) {
      temp[index].Value += row.Value 
    } else {
      temp.push(row)
    }
  })

发帖是因为即使这个问题已经7年了，我仍然没有看到一个符合原始标准的答案：

我不希望它们“拆分”，而是“合并”，更像SQL组方法

我最初发表这篇文章是因为我想找到一种方法来减少对象数组（例如，当您从csv中读取时创建的数据结构），并通过给定索引聚合以生成相同的数据结构。我正在寻找的返回值是另一个对象数组，而不是我在这里看到的嵌套对象或映射。

下面的函数获取一个数据集（对象数组）、一个索引列表（数组）和一个reducer函数，并将reducer功能应用于索引的结果作为一个对象数组返回。

function agg(data, indices, reducer) {

  // helper to create unique index as an array
  function getUniqueIndexHash(row, indices) {
    return indices.reduce((acc, curr) => acc + row[curr], "");
  }

  // reduce data to single object, whose values will be each of the new rows
  // structure is an object whose values are arrays
  // [{}] -> {{}}
  // no operation performed, simply grouping
  let groupedObj = data.reduce((acc, curr) => {
    let currIndex = getUniqueIndexHash(curr, indices);

    // if key does not exist, create array with current row
    if (!Object.keys(acc).includes(currIndex)) {
      acc = {...acc, [currIndex]: [curr]}
    // otherwise, extend the array at currIndex
    } else {
      acc = {...acc, [currIndex]: acc[currIndex].concat(curr)};
    }

    return acc;
  }, {})

  // reduce the array into a single object by applying the reducer
  let reduced = Object.values(groupedObj).map(arr => {
    // for each sub-array, reduce into single object using the reducer function
    let reduceValues = arr.reduce(reducer, {});

    // reducer returns simply the aggregates - add in the indices here
    // each of the objects in "arr" has the same indices, so we take the first
    let indexObj = indices.reduce((acc, curr) => {
      acc = {...acc, [curr]: arr[0][curr]};
      return acc;
    }, {});

    reduceValues = {...indexObj, ...reduceValues};


    return reduceValues;
  });


  return reduced;
}

我将创建一个返回count（*）和sum（Value）的reducer：

reducer = (acc, curr) => {
  acc.count = 1 + (acc.count || 0);
  acc.value = +curr.Value + (acc.value|| 0);
  return acc;
}

最后，使用我们的reducer将agg函数应用于原始数据集会生成一个应用了适当聚合的对象数组：

agg(tasks, ["Phase"], reducer);
// yields:
Array(2) [
  0: Object {Phase: "Phase 1", count: 4, value: 50}
  1: Object {Phase: "Phase 2", count: 4, value: 130}
]

agg(tasks, ["Phase", "Step"], reducer);
// yields:
Array(4) [
  0: Object {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", count: 2, value: 15}
  1: Object {Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", count: 2, value: 35}
  2: Object {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", count: 2, value: 55}
  3: Object {Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", count: 2, value: 75}
]

无突变：

const groupBy = (xs, key) => xs.reduce((acc, x) => Object.assign({}, acc, {
  [x[key]]: (acc[x[key]] || []).concat(x)
}), {})

console.log(groupBy(['one', 'two', 'three'], 'length'));
// => {3: ["one", "two"], 5: ["three"]}

我会检查声明性js groupBy，它似乎正符合您的要求。它也是：

非常有性能（性能基准）用打字机书写，所以所有打字都包括在内。不强制使用第三方类似数组的对象。

import { Reducers } from 'declarative-js';
import groupBy = Reducers.groupBy;
import Map = Reducers.Map;

const data = [
    { Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", Task: "Task 1", Value: "5" },
    { Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 1", Task: "Task 2", Value: "10" },
    { Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", Task: "Task 1", Value: "15" },
    { Phase: "Phase 1", Step: "Step 2", Task: "Task 2", Value: "20" },
    { Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", Task: "Task 1", Value: "25" },
    { Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 1", Task: "Task 2", Value: "30" },
    { Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", Task: "Task 1", Value: "35" },
    { Phase: "Phase 2", Step: "Step 2", Task: "Task 2", Value: "40" }
];

data.reduce(groupBy(element=> element.Step), Map());
data.reduce(groupBy('Step'), Map());