博士tl;

只是替换:

使用实现(如果你不需要传递性)或API(如果你需要传递性)编译 使用testimplemimplementation进行testCompile 使用debugImplementation进行debugCompile androidTestCompile与androidTestImplementation compileOnly仍然有效。它是在3.0中添加的，用于替换提供的和不编译的。(当Gradle没有为该用例提供配置名称时，就引入了该用例，并以Maven提供的作用域命名。)

这是谷歌在IO17大会上宣布的Android Gradle插件3.0的突破性变化之一。

compile配置现在已弃用，应该由实现或api取代

来自Gradle文档:

dependencies { api("commons-httpclient:commons-httpclient:3.1") implementation("org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.5") } Dependencies appearing in the api configurations will be transitively exposed to consumers of the library, and as such will appear on the compile classpath of consumers. Dependencies found in the implementation configuration will, on the other hand, not be exposed to consumers, and therefore not leak into the consumers' compile classpath. This comes with several benefits: dependencies do not leak into the compile classpath of consumers anymore, so you will never accidentally depend on a transitive dependency faster compilation thanks to reduced classpath size less recompilations when implementation dependencies change: consumers would not need to be recompiled cleaner publishing: when used in conjunction with the new maven-publish plugin, Java libraries produce POM files that distinguish exactly between what is required to compile against the library and what is required to use the library at runtime (in other words, don't mix what is needed to compile the library itself and what is needed to compile against the library). The compile configuration still exists, but should not be used as it will not offer the guarantees that the api and implementation configurations provide.

---

注意:如果你只在你的app模块中使用一个库——通常情况下——你不会注意到任何区别。 只有当您有一个相互依赖的模块的复杂项目，或者您正在创建一个库时，您才会看到区别。

编译配置已弃用，应由实现或api取代。

你可以在API和实现分离部分阅读文档。

简短的部分是

The key difference between the standard Java plugin and the Java Library plugin is that the latter introduces the concept of an API exposed to consumers. A library is a Java component meant to be consumed by other components. It's a very common use case in multi-project builds, but also as soon as you have external dependencies. The plugin exposes two configurations that can be used to declare dependencies: api and implementation. The api configuration should be used to declare dependencies which are exported by the library API, whereas the implementation configuration should be used to declare dependencies which are internal to the component.

进一步的解释请参考这张图片。

简单的解决方案:

更好的方法是用实现依赖替换所有编译依赖。只有在泄露模块接口时，才应该使用api。这应该会减少大量的重新编译。

 dependencies {
         implementation fileTree(dir: 'libs', include: ['*.jar'])
 
         implementation 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:25.4.0'
         implementation 'com.android.support.constraint:constraint-layout:1.0.2'
         // …
 
         testImplementation 'junit:junit:4.12'
         androidTestImplementation('com.android.support.test.espresso:espresso-core:2.2.2', {
             exclude group: 'com.android.support', module: 'support-annotations'
         })
 }

---

解释:

在Android Gradle插件3.0之前:我们遇到了一个大问题，即一个代码更改导致所有模块被重新编译。造成这种情况的根本原因是Gradle不知道你是否通过另一个模块泄露了一个模块的接口。

在Android Gradle插件3.0之后:最新的Android Gradle插件现在要求你显式定义是否泄露了模块的接口。在此基础上，它可以对应该重新编译的内容做出正确的选择。

因此，compile依赖项已被弃用，并被两个新的依赖项所取代:

Api:你通过你自己的接口泄露了这个模块的接口，这意味着和旧的编译依赖完全一样 实现:你只在内部使用这个模块，不会通过你的接口泄露它

所以现在你可以显式地告诉Gradle重新编译一个模块，如果使用的模块的接口改变与否。

由Jeroen Mols博客提供

这个答案将演示项目中的实现、api和编译之间的区别。

---

假设我有一个有三个Gradle模块的项目:

app (Android应用程序) myandroidlibrary(一个Android库) myjavalibrary(一个Java库)

应用程序有myandroidlibrary作为依赖项。Myandroidlibrary有myjavlibrary作为依赖项。

myjavlibrary有一个MySecret类

public class MySecret {

    public static String getSecret() {
        return "Money";
    }
}

myandroidlibrary中有MyAndroidComponent类，用于操作MySecret类的值。

public class MyAndroidComponent {

    private static String component = MySecret.getSecret();

    public static String getComponent() {
        return "My component: " + component;
    }    
}

最后，app只对myandroidlibrary的值感兴趣

TextView tvHelloWorld = findViewById(R.id.tv_hello_world);
tvHelloWorld.setText(MyAndroidComponent.getComponent());

---

现在，让我们谈谈依赖关系……

应用需要消耗:myandroidlibrary，所以在应用构建中。Gradle使用实现。

(注意:你也可以使用api/compile。但请稍等片刻。)

dependencies {
    implementation project(':myandroidlibrary')      
}

你认为myandroidlibrary构建了什么?Gradle应该是什么样子?我们应该使用哪个作用域?

我们有三个选择:

dependencies {
    // Option #1
    implementation project(':myjavalibrary') 
    // Option #2
    compile project(':myjavalibrary')      
    // Option #3
    api project(':myjavalibrary')           
}

它们之间的区别是什么，我应该用什么?

编译或Api(选项#2或#3)

如果你使用的是编译器或者api。我们的Android应用现在可以访问myandroidcomponent依赖，这是一个MySecret类。

TextView textView = findViewById(R.id.text_view);
textView.setText(MyAndroidComponent.getComponent());
// You can access MySecret
textView.setText(MySecret.getSecret());

实现(选项#1)

如果您正在使用实现配置，MySecret将不会公开。

TextView textView = findViewById(R.id.text_view);
textView.setText(MyAndroidComponent.getComponent());
// You can NOT access MySecret
textView.setText(MySecret.getSecret()); // Won't even compile

---

那么，应该选择哪种配置呢?那要看你的要求了。

如果你想公开依赖关系，请使用api或compile。

如果你不想公开依赖关系(隐藏你的内部模块)，那么使用实现。

注意:

这只是Gradle配置的一个要点，参见表49.1。Java库插件-用于声明依赖关系的配置，以获得更详细的解释。

这个答案的示例项目可以在https://github.com/aldoKelvianto/ImplementationVsCompile上找到

门外汉术语的简单区别是:

如果你正在处理一个接口或模块，它通过公开所声明的依赖关系的成员来为其他模块提供支持，你应该使用'api'。 如果你正在创建一个应用程序或模块，要在内部实现或使用声明的依赖项，请使用'implementation'。 'compile'与'api'工作方式相同，但是，如果你只是实现或使用任何库，'implementation'将更好地工作并节省资源。

阅读@aldok的回答以获得一个全面的示例。

+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| Name               | Role                 | Consumable? | Resolveable? | Description                             |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| api                | Declaring            |      no     |      no      | This is where you should declare        |
|                    | API                  |             |              | dependencies which are transitively     |
|                    | dependencies         |             |              | exported to consumers, for compile.     |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| implementation     | Declaring            |      no     |      no      | This is where you should                |
|                    | implementation       |             |              | declare dependencies which are          |
|                    | dependencies         |             |              | purely internal and not                 |
|                    |                      |             |              | meant to be exposed to consumers.       |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| compileOnly        | Declaring compile    |     yes     |      yes     | This is where you should                |
|                    | only                 |             |              | declare dependencies                    |
|                    | dependencies         |             |              | which are only required                 |
|                    |                      |             |              | at compile time, but should             |
|                    |                      |             |              | not leak into the runtime.              |
|                    |                      |             |              | This typically includes dependencies    |
|                    |                      |             |              | which are shaded when found at runtime. |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| runtimeOnly        | Declaring            |      no     |      no      | This is where you should                |
|                    | runtime              |             |              | declare dependencies which              |
|                    | dependencies         |             |              | are only required at runtime,           |
|                    |                      |             |              | and not at compile time.                |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| testImplementation | Test dependencies    |      no     |      no      | This is where you                       |
|                    |                      |             |              | should declare dependencies             |
|                    |                      |             |              | which are used to compile tests.        |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| testCompileOnly    | Declaring test       |     yes     |      yes     | This is where you should                |
|                    | compile only         |             |              | declare dependencies                    |
|                    | dependencies         |             |              | which are only required                 |
|                    |                      |             |              | at test compile time,                   |
|                    |                      |             |              | but should not leak into the runtime.   |
|                    |                      |             |              | This typically includes dependencies    |
|                    |                      |             |              | which are shaded when found at runtime. |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+
| testRuntimeOnly    | Declaring test       |      no     |      no      | This is where you should                |
|                    | runtime dependencies |             |              | declare dependencies which              |
|                    |                      |             |              | are only required at test               |
|                    |                      |             |              | runtime, and not at test compile time.  |
+--------------------+----------------------+-------------+--------------+-----------------------------------------+

从版本5.6.3开始，Gradle文档提供了简单的经验规则来识别旧的编译依赖项(或新的依赖项)是否应该用一个实现或api依赖项替换:

Prefer the implementation configuration over api when possible This keeps the dependencies off of the consumer’s compilation classpath. In addition, the consumers will immediately fail to compile if any implementation types accidentally leak into the public API. So when should you use the api configuration? An API dependency is one that contains at least one type that is exposed in the library binary interface, often referred to as its ABI (Application Binary Interface). This includes, but is not limited to: types used in super classes or interfaces types used in public method parameters, including generic parameter types (where public is something that is visible to compilers. I.e. , public, protected and package private members in the Java world) types used in public fields public annotation types By contrast, any type that is used in the following list is irrelevant to the ABI, and therefore should be declared as an implementation dependency: types exclusively used in method bodies types exclusively used in private members types exclusively found in internal classes (future versions of Gradle will let you declare which packages belong to the public API)

Gradle依赖项配置

Gradle 3.0引入了以下变化:

compile -> api api keyword is the same as deprecated compile which expose this dependency for all levels compile -> implementation Is preferable way because has some advantages. implementation expose dependency only for one level up at build time (the dependency is available at runtime). As a result you have a faster build(no need to recompile consumers which are higher then 1 level up) provided -> compileOnly This dependency is available only in compile time(the dependency is not available at runtime). This dependency can not be transitive and be .aar. It can be used with compile time annotation processor[About] and allows you to reduce a final output file compile -> annotationProcessor Very similar to compileOnly but also guarantees that transitive dependency are not visible for consumer apk -> runtimeOnly Dependency is not available in compile time but available at runtime.

[POM依赖类型]

implementation: mostly we use implementation configuration. It hides the internal dependency of the module to its consumer to avoid accidental use of any transitive dependency, hence faster compilation and less recompilation. api: must be used very carefully, since it leaks the to consumer’s compile classpath, hence misusing of api could lead to dependency pollution. compileOnly: when we don’t need any dependency at runtime, since compileOnly dependency won’t become the part of the final build. we will get a smaller build size. runtimeOnly: when we want to change or swap the behaviour of the library at runtime (in final build).

我已经创建了一个深入了解每个工作示例的帖子:源代码

https://medium.com/@gauraw.negi/how-gradle-dependency-configurations-work-underhood-e934906752e5

在继续之前先做一些笔记;compile已弃用，并且文档声明您应该使用implementation，因为compile将在Gradle 7.0版本中被删除。 如果你使用——warning-mode运行Gradle构建，你会看到以下消息:

对于依赖项声明，compile配置已弃用。这将失败，并在Gradle 7.0中出现错误。请改用实现配置。

---

只要看看帮助页上的图片，就很有意义了。

你有蓝色框compileClasspath和runtimeClassPath。 当运行gradle build时，compileClasspath是成功构建所必需的。编译时将出现在类路径上的库将是在gradle构建中使用compileOnly或implementation配置的所有库。

然后我们有runtimeClasspath，这些都是使用实现或runtimeOnly添加的包。所有这些库都将添加到您部署到服务器上的最终构建文件中。

如图所示，如果您希望一个库既用于编译，又希望将它添加到构建文件中，那么应该使用实现。

runtimeOnly的示例可以是数据库驱动程序。 compileOnly的一个例子可以是servlet-api。 实现的一个例子是spring-core。

当你在gradle项目中声明一个依赖项时 代码库+它的依赖关系(声明为api)可以被gradle项目的消费者使用。

让我们举个例子

我们有一级，二级，三级gradle项目。

Level 1使用Level 2。Level 2使用Level 3。

一级<-二级<-三级

使用API和实现，我们可以控制是否应该将级别3的类公开到级别1。

这如何使构建更快:

关卡3的任何变化。不需要重新编译级别1。 特别是在开发过程中，节省时间。

其他答案解释了这种差异。

只要确保对于Kotlin DSL (build.gradle.kts)，函数应该有圆括号，它们的字符串参数应该用双引号括起来，而不是单引号:

Groovy (build.gradle) 实现“com.android.support: appcompat-v7:25.0.0” testImplementation“junit: junit: 4.12” 芬兰湾的科特林(build.gradle.kts) 实现(“com.android.support: appcompat-v7:25.0.0”) testImplementation(“junit: junit: 4.12”)