在更新到Android Studio 3.0并创建一个新项目后,我注意到在构建中。gradle有一种新方法来添加新的依赖项,而不是compile,而是implementation,而不是testCompile,而是testimplemimplementation。
例子:
implementation 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:25.0.0'
testImplementation 'junit:junit:4.12'
而不是
compile 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:25.0.0'
testCompile 'junit:junit:4.12'
它们之间的区别是什么,我应该用什么?
博士tl;
只是替换:
使用实现(如果你不需要传递性)或API(如果你需要传递性)编译
使用testimplemimplementation进行testCompile
使用debugImplementation进行debugCompile
androidTestCompile与androidTestImplementation
compileOnly仍然有效。它是在3.0中添加的,用于替换提供的和不编译的。(当Gradle没有为该用例提供配置名称时,就引入了该用例,并以Maven提供的作用域命名。)
这是谷歌在IO17大会上宣布的Android Gradle插件3.0的突破性变化之一。
compile配置现在已弃用,应该由实现或api取代
来自Gradle文档:
dependencies {
api("commons-httpclient:commons-httpclient:3.1")
implementation("org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.5")
}
Dependencies appearing in the api configurations will be
transitively exposed to consumers of the library, and as such will
appear on the compile classpath of consumers.
Dependencies found in the implementation configuration will, on the
other hand, not be exposed to consumers, and therefore not leak into
the consumers' compile classpath. This comes with several benefits:
dependencies do not leak into the compile classpath of consumers anymore, so you will never accidentally depend on a transitive
dependency
faster compilation thanks to reduced classpath size
less recompilations when implementation dependencies change: consumers would not need to be recompiled
cleaner publishing: when used in conjunction with the new maven-publish plugin, Java libraries produce POM files that
distinguish exactly between what is required to compile against the
library and what is required to use the library at runtime (in other
words, don't mix what is needed to compile the library itself and what
is needed to compile against the library).
The compile configuration still exists, but should not be used as it will not offer the guarantees that the api and implementation configurations provide.
注意:如果你只在你的app模块中使用一个库——通常情况下——你不会注意到任何区别。
只有当您有一个相互依赖的模块的复杂项目,或者您正在创建一个库时,您才会看到区别。
从版本5.6.3开始,Gradle文档提供了简单的经验规则来识别旧的编译依赖项(或新的依赖项)是否应该用一个实现或api依赖项替换:
Prefer the implementation configuration over api when possible
This keeps the dependencies off of the consumer’s compilation classpath. In addition, the consumers will immediately fail to compile if any implementation types accidentally leak into the public API.
So when should you use the api configuration? An API dependency is one that contains at least one type that is exposed in the library binary interface, often referred to as its ABI (Application Binary Interface). This includes, but is not limited to:
types used in super classes or interfaces
types used in public method parameters, including generic parameter types (where public is something that is visible to compilers. I.e. , public, protected and package private members in the Java world)
types used in public fields
public annotation types
By contrast, any type that is used in the following list is irrelevant to the ABI, and therefore should be declared as an implementation dependency:
types exclusively used in method bodies
types exclusively used in private members
types exclusively found in internal classes (future versions of Gradle will let you declare which packages belong to the public API)
简单的解决方案:
更好的方法是用实现依赖替换所有编译依赖。只有在泄露模块接口时,才应该使用api。这应该会减少大量的重新编译。
dependencies {
implementation fileTree(dir: 'libs', include: ['*.jar'])
implementation 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:25.4.0'
implementation 'com.android.support.constraint:constraint-layout:1.0.2'
// …
testImplementation 'junit:junit:4.12'
androidTestImplementation('com.android.support.test.espresso:espresso-core:2.2.2', {
exclude group: 'com.android.support', module: 'support-annotations'
})
}
解释:
在Android Gradle插件3.0之前:我们遇到了一个大问题,即一个代码更改导致所有模块被重新编译。造成这种情况的根本原因是Gradle不知道你是否通过另一个模块泄露了一个模块的接口。
在Android Gradle插件3.0之后:最新的Android Gradle插件现在要求你显式定义是否泄露了模块的接口。在此基础上,它可以对应该重新编译的内容做出正确的选择。
因此,compile依赖项已被弃用,并被两个新的依赖项所取代:
Api:你通过你自己的接口泄露了这个模块的接口,这意味着和旧的编译依赖完全一样
实现:你只在内部使用这个模块,不会通过你的接口泄露它
所以现在你可以显式地告诉Gradle重新编译一个模块,如果使用的模块的接口改变与否。
由Jeroen Mols博客提供