我听说有人选择了其中一种方式,并对其中一种方式发誓。
作为一个Eclipse的忠实粉丝,但没有时间尝试IntelliJ,我很有兴趣从“前Eclipse用户”IntelliJ用户那里听到一些用IntelliJ可以做而用Eclipse不能做的具体事情。
注意:这不是一个主观的问题,也不意味着变成一场IDE圣战。请为任何煽动性的答案投票。
我听说有人选择了其中一种方式,并对其中一种方式发誓。
作为一个Eclipse的忠实粉丝,但没有时间尝试IntelliJ,我很有兴趣从“前Eclipse用户”IntelliJ用户那里听到一些用IntelliJ可以做而用Eclipse不能做的具体事情。
注意:这不是一个主观的问题,也不意味着变成一场IDE圣战。请为任何煽动性的答案投票。
当前回答
别忘了“和剪贴板比较”。
这是我在IntelliJ中一直使用的,而在Eclipse中没有对应的东西。
其他回答
我不记得在Eclipse中是否可以实现字/行/方法/类换行
在Intellij Idea中,您使用Ctrl+W
有很多事情是idea用更简单的方法解决的,或者没有等价的方法:
Autocomplete actions: Doing ctrl+shift+a you can call any idea action from the keyboard without remembering its key combination... Think about gnome-do or launchy in windows, and you've got the idea! Also, this feature supports CamelCasing abbreviations ;) Shelf: Lets you keep easily some pieces of code apart, and then review them through the diff viewer. Local history: It's far better managed, and simpler. SVN annotations and history: simpler to inspect, and also you can easily see the history only for such a part of a whole source file. Autocomplete everywhere, such as the evaluate expression and breakpoint condition windows. Maven integration... much, much simpler, and well integrated. Refactors much closer to the hand, such as loops insertion, wrapping/casting, renaming, and add variables. Find much powerful and well organized. Even in big projects Much stable to work with several branches of a big project at the same time (as a former bugfixer of 1.5Gb by branch sources, and the need to working in them simultaneously, idea shown its rock-solid capabilities) Cleaner and simpler interface... And, simpler to use only with the keyboard, letting apart the need of using the mouse for lots of simple taks, saving you time and giving you more focus on the code... where it matters!
现在,作为开源的…Idea的用户群将呈指数级增长。
Well, for me it's a thousand tiny things. Some of the macros, the GUI layout in general in Eclipse I find awful. I can't open multiple projects in different windows in Eclipse. I can open multiple projects, but then it's view based system swaps a bunch of things around on me when I switch files. IntelliJ's code inspections seem better. Its popup helpers to fix common issues is nice. Lots of simple usability things like the side bar where I can hover over a hot spot and it'll tell me every implementing subclass of a method or the method I'm implementing and from where.
每当我不得不使用Eclipse时,或者看到别人使用Eclipse时,他们似乎可以做我在IntelliJ中可以做的大部分事情,但它花费的时间更长,而且更笨重。
结构搜索和替换。
例如,搜索如下内容:
System.out.println($string$ + $expr$);
其中$string$是一个文字,$expr$是my.package.and.Class类型的表达式,然后替换为:
$expr$.inspect($string$);
Intellij有一个比subversion或Subclipse优秀得多的SVN插件,而且它是有效的!我们在使用Eclipse合并源文件上所浪费的时间是无法想象的。对于IntelliJ,这不是一个问题,因为插件可以帮助你更多。
此外,Subclipse插件也不可靠——我们经常遇到插件认为其他开发人员没有将任何代码签入SVN的情况,但确实存在——CI服务器已经处理了它们!