对于无意中发现这条线索的人，这里有一个更完整的解决方案。它将比较两个对象，并给出所有属性的键，这些属性要么只存在于object1中，要么只存在于object2中，要么同时存在于object1和object2中，但值不同:

/*
 * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the
 * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. Key points:
 *
 * - All keys of obj2 are initially in the result.
 *
 * - If the loop finds a key (from obj1, remember) not in obj2, it adds
 *   it to the result.
 *
 * - If the loop finds a key that are both in obj1 and obj2, it compares
 *   the value. If it's the same value, the key is removed from the result.
 */
function getObjectDiff(obj1, obj2) {
    const diff = Object.keys(obj1).reduce((result, key) => {
        if (!obj2.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
            result.push(key);
        } else if (_.isEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key])) {
            const resultKeyIndex = result.indexOf(key);
            result.splice(resultKeyIndex, 1);
        }
        return result;
    }, Object.keys(obj2));

    return diff;
}

下面是一个输出示例:

// Test
let obj1 = {
    a: 1,
    b: 2,
    c: { foo: 1, bar: 2},
    d: { baz: 1, bat: 2 }
}

let obj2 = {
    b: 2, 
    c: { foo: 1, bar: 'monkey'}, 
    d: { baz: 1, bat: 2 }
    e: 1
}
getObjectDiff(obj1, obj2)
// ["c", "e", "a"]

如果你不关心嵌套对象并且想要跳过lodash，你可以替换_。isEqual用于正常的值比较，例如obj1[key] === obj2[key]。

As it was asked, here's a recursive object comparison function. And a bit more. Assuming that primary use of such function is object inspection, I have something to say. Complete deep comparison is a bad idea when some differences are irrelevant. For example, blind deep comparison in TDD assertions makes tests unnecessary brittle. For that reason, I'd like to introduce a much more valuable partial diff. It is a recursive analogue of a previous contribution to this thread. It ignores keys not present in a

var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => key + '.' + x) 
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key] : [])),
        []);

BDiff允许检查期望值，同时容忍其他属性，这正是您想要的自动检查。这允许构建各种高级断言。例如:

var diff = bdiff(expected, actual);
// all expected properties match
console.assert(diff.length == 0, "Objects differ", diff, expected, actual);
// controlled inequality
console.assert(diff.length < 3, "Too many differences", diff, expected, actual);

回到完整的解决方案。使用bdiff构建一个完整的传统diff是很简单的:

function diff(a, b) {
    var u = bdiff(a, b), v = bdiff(b, a);
    return u.filter(x=>!v.includes(x)).map(x=>' < ' + x)
    .concat(u.filter(x=>v.includes(x)).map(x=>' | ' + x))
    .concat(v.filter(x=>!u.includes(x)).map(x=>' > ' + x));
};

在两个复杂对象上运行上述函数将输出类似于下面的内容:

 [
  " < components.0.components.1.components.1.isNew",
  " < components.0.cryptoKey",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.min",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.max",
  " > components.0.components.1.components.1.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.3.FFTResult"
 ]

最后，为了了解值之间的差异，我们可能需要直接eval() diff输出。为此，我们需要一个更丑的bdiff版本，输出语法正确的路径:

// provides syntactically correct output
var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => 
                key + (key.trim ? '':']') + (x.search(/^\d/)? '.':'[') + x)
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key + (key.trim ? '':']')] : [])),
        []);

// now we can eval output of the diff fuction that we left unchanged
diff(a, b).filter(x=>x[1] == '|').map(x=>[x].concat([a, b].map(y=>((z) =>eval('z.' + x.substr(3))).call(this, y)))));

这将输出类似于下面的内容:

[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.min", 0, 3]
[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.max", 100, 50]

“一族”许可

var isEqual = function(f,s) {
  if (f === s) return true;

  if (Array.isArray(f)&&Array.isArray(s)) {
    return isEqual(f.sort(), s.sort());
  }
  if (_.isObject(f)) {
    return isEqual(f, s);
  }
  return _.isEqual(f, s);
};

我尝试了Adam Boduch的代码来输出一个很深的差异-这完全没有经过测试，但碎片在那里:

function diff (obj1, obj2, path) {
    obj1 = obj1 || {};
    obj2 = obj2 || {};

    return _.reduce(obj1, function(result, value, key) {
        var p = path ? path + '.' + key : key;
        if (_.isObject(value)) {
            var d = diff(value, obj2[key], p);
            return d.length ? result.concat(d) : result;
        }
        return _.isEqual(value, obj2[key]) ? result : result.concat(p);
    }, []);
}

diff({ foo: 'lol', bar: { baz: true }}, {}) // returns ["foo", "bar.baz"]

已经有很多答案发布，但对于那些好奇的人来说，避免编写任何代码来计算具有任何类型结构的两个对象之间的差异，实际上有一个库可以做到这一点。Lodash isEqual只返回true或false，它不返回任何关于更改属性的信息。https://www.npmjs.com/package/deep-diff

它返回两个对象之间差异的完整细节

import DeepDiff from 'deep-diff';
let a = {...} //some object
let b = {...} //some object 
var differences = DeepDiff.diff(a, b);

在这篇文章中也有人提出了类似的问题 获取2个JSON对象之间的差异

这段代码返回一个具有不同值的所有属性的对象，以及两个对象的值。对记录差异很有用。

var allkeys = _.union(_.keys(obj1), _.keys(obj2));
var difference = _.reduce(allkeys, function (result, key) {
  if ( !_.isEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key]) ) {
    result[key] = {obj1: obj1[key], obj2: obj2[key]}
  }
  return result;
}, {});