我有2个不同的嵌套对象,我需要知道它们是否在其中一个嵌套属性中有不同。

var a = {};
var b = {};

a.prop1 = 2;
a.prop2 = { prop3: 2 };

b.prop1 = 2;
b.prop2 = { prop3: 3 };

对象可以更复杂,有更多嵌套的属性。但这是一个很好的例子。我可以选择使用递归函数或lodash的东西…


当前回答

As it was asked, here's a recursive object comparison function. And a bit more. Assuming that primary use of such function is object inspection, I have something to say. Complete deep comparison is a bad idea when some differences are irrelevant. For example, blind deep comparison in TDD assertions makes tests unnecessary brittle. For that reason, I'd like to introduce a much more valuable partial diff. It is a recursive analogue of a previous contribution to this thread. It ignores keys not present in a

var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => key + '.' + x) 
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key] : [])),
        []);

BDiff允许检查期望值,同时容忍其他属性,这正是您想要的自动检查。这允许构建各种高级断言。例如:

var diff = bdiff(expected, actual);
// all expected properties match
console.assert(diff.length == 0, "Objects differ", diff, expected, actual);
// controlled inequality
console.assert(diff.length < 3, "Too many differences", diff, expected, actual);

回到完整的解决方案。使用bdiff构建一个完整的传统diff是很简单的:

function diff(a, b) {
    var u = bdiff(a, b), v = bdiff(b, a);
    return u.filter(x=>!v.includes(x)).map(x=>' < ' + x)
    .concat(u.filter(x=>v.includes(x)).map(x=>' | ' + x))
    .concat(v.filter(x=>!u.includes(x)).map(x=>' > ' + x));
};

在两个复杂对象上运行上述函数将输出类似于下面的内容:

 [
  " < components.0.components.1.components.1.isNew",
  " < components.0.cryptoKey",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.min",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.max",
  " > components.0.components.1.components.1.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.3.FFTResult"
 ]

最后,为了了解值之间的差异,我们可能需要直接eval() diff输出。为此,我们需要一个更丑的bdiff版本,输出语法正确的路径:

// provides syntactically correct output
var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => 
                key + (key.trim ? '':']') + (x.search(/^\d/)? '.':'[') + x)
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key + (key.trim ? '':']')] : [])),
        []);

// now we can eval output of the diff fuction that we left unchanged
diff(a, b).filter(x=>x[1] == '|').map(x=>[x].concat([a, b].map(y=>((z) =>eval('z.' + x.substr(3))).call(this, y)))));

这将输出类似于下面的内容:

[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.min", 0, 3]
[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.max", 100, 50]

“一族”许可

其他回答

深度比较使用模板的(嵌套)属性进行检查

function objetcsDeepEqualByTemplate(objectA, objectB, comparisonTemplate) {
  if (!objectA || !objectB) return false

  let areDifferent = false
  Object.keys(comparisonTemplate).some((key) => {
    if (typeof comparisonTemplate[key] === 'object') {
      areDifferent = !objetcsDeepEqualByTemplate(objectA[key], objectB[key], comparisonTemplate[key])
      return areDifferent
    } else if (comparisonTemplate[key] === true) {
      areDifferent = objectA[key] !== objectB[key]
      return areDifferent
    } else {
      return false
    }
  })

  return !areDifferent
}

const objA = { 
  a: 1,
  b: {
    a: 21,
    b: 22,
  },
  c: 3,
}

const objB = { 
  a: 1,
  b: {
    a: 21,
    b: 25,
  },
  c: true,
}

// template tells which props to compare
const comparisonTemplateA = {
  a: true,
  b: {
    a: true
  }
}
objetcsDeepEqualByTemplate(objA, objB, comparisonTemplateA)
// returns true

const comparisonTemplateB = {
  a: true,
  c: true
}
// returns false
objetcsDeepEqualByTemplate(objA, objB, comparisonTemplateB)

这将在控制台中工作。如果需要,可以添加数组支持

要递归地显示一个对象与其他对象的不同之处,可以使用_。Reduce与_结合。isEqual和_.isPlainObject。在这种情况下,你可以比较a与b的不同,或者b与a的不同:

const objectA = { a: { 1: "SAME WILL BE MISSING IN RESULT", 2: "BBB", 3: [1, 2, 3] }, b: "not", c: "foo bar" }; const objectB = { a: { 1: "SAME WILL BE MISSING IN RESULT", 2: [1, 2] }, b: "foo", c: "bar" }; const diff = function(obj1, obj2) { return _.reduce(obj1, function(result, value, key) { if (_.isPlainObject(value)) { result[key] = diff(value, obj2[key]); } else if (!_.isEqual(value, obj2[key])) { result[key] = value; } return result; }, {}); }; const diffAOverB = diff(objectA, objectB); const diffBOverA = diff(objectA, objectB); console.log(diffAOverB); console.log(diffBOverA); <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

已经有很多答案发布,但对于那些好奇的人来说,避免编写任何代码来计算具有任何类型结构的两个对象之间的差异,实际上有一个库可以做到这一点。Lodash isEqual只返回true或false,它不返回任何关于更改属性的信息。https://www.npmjs.com/package/deep-diff

它返回两个对象之间差异的完整细节

import DeepDiff from 'deep-diff';
let a = {...} //some object
let b = {...} //some object 
var differences = DeepDiff.diff(a, b);

在这篇文章中也有人提出了类似的问题 获取2个JSON对象之间的差异

下面是一个使用Lodash的简单解决方案:

_.differenceWith(a, b, _.isEqual);

注意,两个输入都需要是数组(可能是一个对象的数组)。

As it was asked, here's a recursive object comparison function. And a bit more. Assuming that primary use of such function is object inspection, I have something to say. Complete deep comparison is a bad idea when some differences are irrelevant. For example, blind deep comparison in TDD assertions makes tests unnecessary brittle. For that reason, I'd like to introduce a much more valuable partial diff. It is a recursive analogue of a previous contribution to this thread. It ignores keys not present in a

var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => key + '.' + x) 
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key] : [])),
        []);

BDiff允许检查期望值,同时容忍其他属性,这正是您想要的自动检查。这允许构建各种高级断言。例如:

var diff = bdiff(expected, actual);
// all expected properties match
console.assert(diff.length == 0, "Objects differ", diff, expected, actual);
// controlled inequality
console.assert(diff.length < 3, "Too many differences", diff, expected, actual);

回到完整的解决方案。使用bdiff构建一个完整的传统diff是很简单的:

function diff(a, b) {
    var u = bdiff(a, b), v = bdiff(b, a);
    return u.filter(x=>!v.includes(x)).map(x=>' < ' + x)
    .concat(u.filter(x=>v.includes(x)).map(x=>' | ' + x))
    .concat(v.filter(x=>!u.includes(x)).map(x=>' > ' + x));
};

在两个复杂对象上运行上述函数将输出类似于下面的内容:

 [
  " < components.0.components.1.components.1.isNew",
  " < components.0.cryptoKey",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.min",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.max",
  " > components.0.components.1.components.1.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.3.FFTResult"
 ]

最后,为了了解值之间的差异,我们可能需要直接eval() diff输出。为此,我们需要一个更丑的bdiff版本,输出语法正确的路径:

// provides syntactically correct output
var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => 
                key + (key.trim ? '':']') + (x.search(/^\d/)? '.':'[') + x)
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key + (key.trim ? '':']')] : [])),
        []);

// now we can eval output of the diff fuction that we left unchanged
diff(a, b).filter(x=>x[1] == '|').map(x=>[x].concat([a, b].map(y=>((z) =>eval('z.' + x.substr(3))).call(this, y)))));

这将输出类似于下面的内容:

[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.min", 0, 3]
[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.max", 100, 50]

“一族”许可