我知道这并不能直接回答OP的问题，但我是通过搜索如何删除lodash被引导到这里的。希望这能帮助到和我处境相似的人。

这要归功于@JohanPersson。我在这个答案的基础上实现了对深度嵌套值的比较，并获得对差异的键引用

getObjectDiff = (obj1, obj2) => { const obj1Props = Object.keys(obj1); const obj2Props = Object.keys(obj2); const keysWithDiffValue = obj1Props.reduce((keysWithDiffValueAccumulator, key) => { const propExistsOnObj2 = obj2.hasOwnProperty(key); const hasNestedValue = obj1[key] instanceof Object && obj2[key] instanceof Object; const keyValuePairBetweenBothObjectsIsEqual = obj1[key] === obj2[key]; if (!propExistsOnObj2) { keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.push(key); } else if (hasNestedValue) { const keyIndex = keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.indexOf(key); if (keyIndex >= 0) { keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.splice(keyIndex, 1); } const nestedDiffs = getObjectDiff(obj1[key], obj2[key]); for (let diff of nestedDiffs) { keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.push(`${key}.${diff}`); } } else if (keyValuePairBetweenBothObjectsIsEqual) { const equalValueKeyIndex = keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.indexOf(key); keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.splice(equalValueKeyIndex, 1); } return keysWithDiffValueAccumulator; }, obj2Props); return keysWithDiffValue; } const obj1 = {a0: {a1: {a2: {a3: 'Im here'}}}}; const obj2 = {a0: {a1: {a2: {a3: 'Not here', b3: 'some'}}}}; console.log('final', getObjectDiff(obj1, obj2));

As it was asked, here's a recursive object comparison function. And a bit more. Assuming that primary use of such function is object inspection, I have something to say. Complete deep comparison is a bad idea when some differences are irrelevant. For example, blind deep comparison in TDD assertions makes tests unnecessary brittle. For that reason, I'd like to introduce a much more valuable partial diff. It is a recursive analogue of a previous contribution to this thread. It ignores keys not present in a

var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => key + '.' + x) 
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key] : [])),
        []);

BDiff允许检查期望值，同时容忍其他属性，这正是您想要的自动检查。这允许构建各种高级断言。例如:

var diff = bdiff(expected, actual);
// all expected properties match
console.assert(diff.length == 0, "Objects differ", diff, expected, actual);
// controlled inequality
console.assert(diff.length < 3, "Too many differences", diff, expected, actual);

回到完整的解决方案。使用bdiff构建一个完整的传统diff是很简单的:

function diff(a, b) {
    var u = bdiff(a, b), v = bdiff(b, a);
    return u.filter(x=>!v.includes(x)).map(x=>' < ' + x)
    .concat(u.filter(x=>v.includes(x)).map(x=>' | ' + x))
    .concat(v.filter(x=>!u.includes(x)).map(x=>' > ' + x));
};

在两个复杂对象上运行上述函数将输出类似于下面的内容:

 [
  " < components.0.components.1.components.1.isNew",
  " < components.0.cryptoKey",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.min",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.max",
  " > components.0.components.1.components.1.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.3.FFTResult"
 ]

最后，为了了解值之间的差异，我们可能需要直接eval() diff输出。为此，我们需要一个更丑的bdiff版本，输出语法正确的路径:

// provides syntactically correct output
var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => 
                key + (key.trim ? '':']') + (x.search(/^\d/)? '.':'[') + x)
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key + (key.trim ? '':']')] : [])),
        []);

// now we can eval output of the diff fuction that we left unchanged
diff(a, b).filter(x=>x[1] == '|').map(x=>[x].concat([a, b].map(y=>((z) =>eval('z.' + x.substr(3))).call(this, y)))));

这将输出类似于下面的内容:

[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.min", 0, 3]
[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.max", 100, 50]

“一族”许可

对于无意中发现这条线索的人，这里有一个更完整的解决方案。它将比较两个对象，并给出所有属性的键，这些属性要么只存在于object1中，要么只存在于object2中，要么同时存在于object1和object2中，但值不同:

/*
 * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the
 * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. Key points:
 *
 * - All keys of obj2 are initially in the result.
 *
 * - If the loop finds a key (from obj1, remember) not in obj2, it adds
 *   it to the result.
 *
 * - If the loop finds a key that are both in obj1 and obj2, it compares
 *   the value. If it's the same value, the key is removed from the result.
 */
function getObjectDiff(obj1, obj2) {
    const diff = Object.keys(obj1).reduce((result, key) => {
        if (!obj2.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
            result.push(key);
        } else if (_.isEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key])) {
            const resultKeyIndex = result.indexOf(key);
            result.splice(resultKeyIndex, 1);
        }
        return result;
    }, Object.keys(obj2));

    return diff;
}

下面是一个输出示例:

// Test
let obj1 = {
    a: 1,
    b: 2,
    c: { foo: 1, bar: 2},
    d: { baz: 1, bat: 2 }
}

let obj2 = {
    b: 2, 
    c: { foo: 1, bar: 'monkey'}, 
    d: { baz: 1, bat: 2 }
    e: 1
}
getObjectDiff(obj1, obj2)
// ["c", "e", "a"]

如果你不关心嵌套对象并且想要跳过lodash，你可以替换_。isEqual用于正常的值比较，例如obj1[key] === obj2[key]。

一个简单而优雅的解决方案是使用_。isEqual，它执行深度比较:

Var a = {}; Var b = {}; A.prop1 = 2; A.prop2 = {prop3: 2}; B.prop1 = 2; B.prop2 = {prop3: 3}; console.log(_。isEqual (a, b));//如果不同则返回false < script src = " https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js " > < /脚本>

然而，这个解决方案并没有显示哪个属性是不同的。

此解决方案返回一个具有修改过的属性的对象。

_.reduce(a, (r, v, k) => { return _.merge(r, _.isEqual(v, b[k]) ? {} : { [k]: v }); }, {});

下面是一个使用Lodash的简单解决方案:

_.differenceWith(a, b, _.isEqual);

注意，两个输入都需要是数组(可能是一个对象的数组)。