我知道这并不能直接回答OP的问题，但我是通过搜索如何删除lodash被引导到这里的。希望这能帮助到和我处境相似的人。

这要归功于@JohanPersson。我在这个答案的基础上实现了对深度嵌套值的比较，并获得对差异的键引用

getObjectDiff = (obj1, obj2) => { const obj1Props = Object.keys(obj1); const obj2Props = Object.keys(obj2); const keysWithDiffValue = obj1Props.reduce((keysWithDiffValueAccumulator, key) => { const propExistsOnObj2 = obj2.hasOwnProperty(key); const hasNestedValue = obj1[key] instanceof Object && obj2[key] instanceof Object; const keyValuePairBetweenBothObjectsIsEqual = obj1[key] === obj2[key]; if (!propExistsOnObj2) { keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.push(key); } else if (hasNestedValue) { const keyIndex = keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.indexOf(key); if (keyIndex >= 0) { keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.splice(keyIndex, 1); } const nestedDiffs = getObjectDiff(obj1[key], obj2[key]); for (let diff of nestedDiffs) { keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.push(`${key}.${diff}`); } } else if (keyValuePairBetweenBothObjectsIsEqual) { const equalValueKeyIndex = keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.indexOf(key); keysWithDiffValueAccumulator.splice(equalValueKeyIndex, 1); } return keysWithDiffValueAccumulator; }, obj2Props); return keysWithDiffValue; } const obj1 = {a0: {a1: {a2: {a3: 'Im here'}}}}; const obj2 = {a0: {a1: {a2: {a3: 'Not here', b3: 'some'}}}}; console.log('final', getObjectDiff(obj1, obj2));

已经有很多答案发布，但对于那些好奇的人来说，避免编写任何代码来计算具有任何类型结构的两个对象之间的差异，实际上有一个库可以做到这一点。Lodash isEqual只返回true或false，它不返回任何关于更改属性的信息。https://www.npmjs.com/package/deep-diff

它返回两个对象之间差异的完整细节

import DeepDiff from 'deep-diff';
let a = {...} //some object
let b = {...} //some object 
var differences = DeepDiff.diff(a, b);

在这篇文章中也有人提出了类似的问题 获取2个JSON对象之间的差异

As it was asked, here's a recursive object comparison function. And a bit more. Assuming that primary use of such function is object inspection, I have something to say. Complete deep comparison is a bad idea when some differences are irrelevant. For example, blind deep comparison in TDD assertions makes tests unnecessary brittle. For that reason, I'd like to introduce a much more valuable partial diff. It is a recursive analogue of a previous contribution to this thread. It ignores keys not present in a

var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => key + '.' + x) 
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key] : [])),
        []);

BDiff允许检查期望值，同时容忍其他属性，这正是您想要的自动检查。这允许构建各种高级断言。例如:

var diff = bdiff(expected, actual);
// all expected properties match
console.assert(diff.length == 0, "Objects differ", diff, expected, actual);
// controlled inequality
console.assert(diff.length < 3, "Too many differences", diff, expected, actual);

回到完整的解决方案。使用bdiff构建一个完整的传统diff是很简单的:

function diff(a, b) {
    var u = bdiff(a, b), v = bdiff(b, a);
    return u.filter(x=>!v.includes(x)).map(x=>' < ' + x)
    .concat(u.filter(x=>v.includes(x)).map(x=>' | ' + x))
    .concat(v.filter(x=>!u.includes(x)).map(x=>' > ' + x));
};

在两个复杂对象上运行上述函数将输出类似于下面的内容:

 [
  " < components.0.components.1.components.1.isNew",
  " < components.0.cryptoKey",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.min",
  " | components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.FFT.max",
  " > components.0.components.1.components.1.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.2.components.2.components.2.merkleTree",
  " > components.0.components.3.FFTResult"
 ]

最后，为了了解值之间的差异，我们可能需要直接eval() diff输出。为此，我们需要一个更丑的bdiff版本，输出语法正确的路径:

// provides syntactically correct output
var bdiff = (a, b) =>
    _.reduce(a, (res, val, key) =>
        res.concat((_.isPlainObject(val) || _.isArray(val)) && b
            ? bdiff(val, b[key]).map(x => 
                key + (key.trim ? '':']') + (x.search(/^\d/)? '.':'[') + x)
            : (!b || val != b[key] ? [key + (key.trim ? '':']')] : [])),
        []);

// now we can eval output of the diff fuction that we left unchanged
diff(a, b).filter(x=>x[1] == '|').map(x=>[x].concat([a, b].map(y=>((z) =>eval('z.' + x.substr(3))).call(this, y)))));

这将输出类似于下面的内容:

[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.min", 0, 3]
[" | components[0].components[2].components[2].components[2].FFT.max", 100, 50]

“一族”许可

如果你需要知道哪些属性是不同的，使用reduce():

_.reduce(a, function(result, value, key) {
    return _.isEqual(value, b[key]) ?
        result : result.concat(key);
}, []);
// → [ "prop2" ]

下面是一个使用Lodash的简单解决方案:

_.differenceWith(a, b, _.isEqual);

注意，两个输入都需要是数组(可能是一个对象的数组)。

在没有使用lodash/下划线的情况下，我已经编写了这段代码，并且可以很好地对object1和object2进行深入比较

function getObjectDiff(a, b) {
    var diffObj = {};
    if (Array.isArray(a)) {
        a.forEach(function(elem, index) {
            if (!Array.isArray(diffObj)) {
                diffObj = [];
            }
            diffObj[index] = getObjectDiff(elem, (b || [])[index]);
        });
    } else if (a != null && typeof a == 'object') {
        Object.keys(a).forEach(function(key) {
            if (Array.isArray(a[key])) {
                var arr = getObjectDiff(a[key], b[key]);
                if (!Array.isArray(arr)) {
                    arr = [];
                }
                arr.forEach(function(elem, index) {
                    if (!Array.isArray(diffObj[key])) {
                        diffObj[key] = [];
                    }
                    diffObj[key][index] = elem;
                });
            } else if (typeof a[key] == 'object') {
                diffObj[key] = getObjectDiff(a[key], b[key]);
            } else if (a[key] != (b || {})[key]) {
                diffObj[key] = a[key];
            } else if (a[key] == (b || {})[key]) {
                delete a[key];
            }
        });
    }
    Object.keys(diffObj).forEach(function(key) {
        if (typeof diffObj[key] == 'object' && JSON.stringify(diffObj[key]) == '{}') {
            delete diffObj[key];
        }
    });
    return diffObj;
}