另一个答案是:

想象一下这个文件夹结构:

node_modules lodash src 子目录 foo.js bar.js main.js 测试 . js

然后在test.js中，你需要这样的文件:

const foo = require("../src/subdir/foo");
const bar = require("../src/subdir/bar");
const main = require("../src/main");
const _ = require("lodash");

在main.js中:

const foo = require("./subdir/foo");
const bar = require("./subdir/bar");
const _ = require("lodash");

现在你可以使用。babelrc文件中的babel和babel插件模块解析器来配置两个根文件夹:

{
    "plugins": [
        ["module-resolver", {
            "root": ["./src", "./src/subdir"]
        }]
    ]
}

现在你可以在测试和src中以同样的方式要求文件:

const foo = require("foo");
const bar = require("bar");
const main = require("main");
const _ = require("lodash");

如果你想使用es6模块语法:

{
    "plugins": [
        ["module-resolver", {
            "root": ["./src", "./src/subdir"]
        }],
        "transform-es2015-modules-commonjs"
    ]
}

然后像这样在测试和SRC中导入文件:

import foo from "foo"
import bar from "bar"
import _ from "lodash"

在Browserify手册中有一个非常有趣的章节:

avoiding ../../../../../../.. Not everything in an application properly belongs on the public npm and the overhead of setting up a private npm or git repo is still rather large in many cases. Here are some approaches for avoiding the ../../../../../../../ relative paths problem. node_modules People sometimes object to putting application-specific modules into node_modules because it is not obvious how to check in your internal modules without also checking in third-party modules from npm. The answer is quite simple! If you have a .gitignore file that ignores node_modules: node_modules You can just add an exception with ! for each of your internal application modules: node_modules/* !node_modules/foo !node_modules/bar Please note that you can't unignore a subdirectory, if the parent is already ignored. So instead of ignoring node_modules, you have to ignore every directory inside node_modules with the node_modules/* trick, and then you can add your exceptions. Now anywhere in your application you will be able to require('foo') or require('bar') without having a very large and fragile relative path. If you have a lot of modules and want to keep them more separate from the third-party modules installed by npm, you can just put them all under a directory in node_modules such as node_modules/app: node_modules/app/foo node_modules/app/bar Now you will be able to require('app/foo') or require('app/bar') from anywhere in your application. In your .gitignore, just add an exception for node_modules/app: node_modules/* !node_modules/app If your application had transforms configured in package.json, you'll need to create a separate package.json with its own transform field in your node_modules/foo or node_modules/app/foo component directory because transforms don't apply across module boundaries. This will make your modules more robust against configuration changes in your application and it will be easier to independently reuse the packages outside of your application. symlink Another handy trick if you are working on an application where you can make symlinks and don't need to support windows is to symlink a lib/ or app/ folder into node_modules. From the project root, do: ln -s ../lib node_modules/app and now from anywhere in your project you'll be able to require files in lib/ by doing require('app/foo.js') to get lib/foo.js. custom paths You might see some places talk about using the $NODE_PATH environment variable or opts.paths to add directories for node and browserify to look in to find modules. Unlike most other platforms, using a shell-style array of path directories with $NODE_PATH is not as favorable in node compared to making effective use of the node_modules directory. This is because your application is more tightly coupled to a runtime environment configuration so there are more moving parts and your application will only work when your environment is setup correctly. node and browserify both support but discourage the use of $NODE_PATH.

我编写了这个小包，它允许您通过项目根的相对路径来要求包，而不引入任何全局变量或覆盖节点默认值

https://github.com/Gaafar/pkg-require

它是这样工作的

// create an instance that will find the nearest parent dir containing package.json from your __dirname
const pkgRequire = require('pkg-require')(__dirname);

// require a file relative to the your package.json directory 
const foo = pkgRequire('foo/foo')

// get the absolute path for a file
const absolutePathToFoo = pkgRequire.resolve('foo/foo')

// get the absolute path to your root directory
const packageRootPath = pkgRequire.root()

这是我六个多月来的实际做法。我在项目中使用一个名为node_modules的文件夹作为我的根文件夹，这样它将始终从我调用绝对require的任何地方查找该文件夹:

node_modules myProject index.js我可以require("myProject/someFolder/hey.js")而不是require("./someFolder/hey.js") 包含hey.js的someFolder

当你被嵌套到文件夹中时，这更有用，如果以绝对方式设置，更改文件位置的工作要少得多。我在整个应用程序中只使用了2个相对要求。

我认为你不需要用你描述的方式来解决这个问题。如果您想在大量文件中更改相同的字符串，请使用sed。在你的例子中，

find . -name "*.js" -exec sed -i 's/\.\.\/\.\.\//\.\.\//g' {} +

/../变成了../

或者，您可以要求配置文件存储包含库路径的变量。如果您将以下文件存储为config.js在示例目录中

var config = {};
config.path = '../../';

在你的例子文件中

myConfiguration = require('./config');
express = require(config.path);

您将能够从一个文件控制每个示例的配置。

这只是个人喜好。

前段时间我创建了一个模块，用于加载相对于预定义路径的模块。

https://github.com/raaymax/irequire

你可以用它来代替require。

irequire.prefix('controllers',join.path(__dirname,'app/master'));
var adminUsersCtrl = irequire("controllers:admin/users");
var net = irequire('net');

也许它会对某人有用。