我想要求我的文件总是通过我的项目的根,而不是相对于当前模块。

例如,如果查看https://github.com/visionmedia/express/blob/2820f2227de0229c5d7f28009aa432f9f3a7b5f9/examples/downloads/app.js第6行,您将看到

express = require('../../')

在我看来,这真的很糟糕。假设我想让我所有的例子都只靠近根结点一层。这是不可能的,因为我必须更新超过30个例子,并且在每个例子中更新很多次。:

express = require('../')

我的解决方案是有一个基于根的特殊情况:如果字符串以$开头,那么它相对于项目的根文件夹。

任何帮助都是感激的,谢谢

更新2

现在我使用require.js,它允许你以一种方式编写,在客户端和服务器上都可以工作。Require.js还允许你创建自定义路径。

更新3

现在我转移到webpack + gulp,我使用enhanced-require来处理服务器端模块。看这里的基本原理:http://hackhat.com/p/110/module-loader-webpack-vs-requirejs-vs-browserify/


当前回答

我在我的项目中使用process.cwd()。例如:

var Foo = require(process.cwd() + '/common/foo.js');

值得注意的是,这将导致需要一个绝对路径,尽管我还没有在这方面遇到问题。

其他回答

你可以用我做的一个模块,Undot。它没有什么高级的,只是一个助手,让你可以避免那些点地狱与简单。

例子:

var undot = require('undot');
var User = undot('models/user');
var config = undot('config');
var test = undot('test/api/user/auth');

在Browserify手册中有一个非常有趣的章节:

avoiding ../../../../../../.. Not everything in an application properly belongs on the public npm and the overhead of setting up a private npm or git repo is still rather large in many cases. Here are some approaches for avoiding the ../../../../../../../ relative paths problem. node_modules People sometimes object to putting application-specific modules into node_modules because it is not obvious how to check in your internal modules without also checking in third-party modules from npm. The answer is quite simple! If you have a .gitignore file that ignores node_modules: node_modules You can just add an exception with ! for each of your internal application modules: node_modules/* !node_modules/foo !node_modules/bar Please note that you can't unignore a subdirectory, if the parent is already ignored. So instead of ignoring node_modules, you have to ignore every directory inside node_modules with the node_modules/* trick, and then you can add your exceptions. Now anywhere in your application you will be able to require('foo') or require('bar') without having a very large and fragile relative path. If you have a lot of modules and want to keep them more separate from the third-party modules installed by npm, you can just put them all under a directory in node_modules such as node_modules/app: node_modules/app/foo node_modules/app/bar Now you will be able to require('app/foo') or require('app/bar') from anywhere in your application. In your .gitignore, just add an exception for node_modules/app: node_modules/* !node_modules/app If your application had transforms configured in package.json, you'll need to create a separate package.json with its own transform field in your node_modules/foo or node_modules/app/foo component directory because transforms don't apply across module boundaries. This will make your modules more robust against configuration changes in your application and it will be easier to independently reuse the packages outside of your application. symlink Another handy trick if you are working on an application where you can make symlinks and don't need to support windows is to symlink a lib/ or app/ folder into node_modules. From the project root, do: ln -s ../lib node_modules/app and now from anywhere in your project you'll be able to require files in lib/ by doing require('app/foo.js') to get lib/foo.js. custom paths You might see some places talk about using the $NODE_PATH environment variable or opts.paths to add directories for node and browserify to look in to find modules. Unlike most other platforms, using a shell-style array of path directories with $NODE_PATH is not as favorable in node compared to making effective use of the node_modules directory. This is because your application is more tightly coupled to a runtime environment configuration so there are more moving parts and your application will only work when your environment is setup correctly. node and browserify both support but discourage the use of $NODE_PATH.

我们准备尝试一种新的方法来解决这个问题。

以其他已知项目(如spring和guice)为例,我们将定义一个“context”对象,它将包含所有的“require”语句。

该对象将被传递给所有其他模块使用。

例如

var context = {}

context.module1 = require("./module1")( { "context" : context } )
context.module2 = require("./module2")( { "context" : context } )

这要求我们将每个模块编写为一个接收选项的函数,这对我们来说是一个最佳实践。

module.exports = function(context){ ... }

然后你会引用上下文而不是要求东西。

var module1Ref = context.moduel1;

如果您愿意,可以轻松地编写一个循环来执行require语句

var context = {};
var beans = {"module1" : "./module1","module2" : "./module2" }; 
for ( var i in beans ){
    if ( beans.hasOwnProperty(i)){
         context[i] = require(beans[i])(context);
    }
};

当您想要模拟(测试)时,这将使工作变得更容易,并且在使代码作为包可重用的同时解决了您的问题。

您还可以通过分离bean声明来重用上下文初始化代码。 例如,你的main.js文件可能是这样的

var beans = { ... }; // like before
var context = require("context")(beans); // this example assumes context is a node_module since it is reused.. 

这种方法也适用于外部库,不需要每次我们需要它们时都硬编码它们的名称-但是它需要特殊处理,因为它们的导出不是需要上下文的函数。

稍后,我们还可以将bean定义为函数——这将允许我们根据环境需要不同的模块——但这超出了这个线程的范围。

我认为你不需要用你描述的方式来解决这个问题。如果您想在大量文件中更改相同的字符串,请使用sed。在你的例子中,

find . -name "*.js" -exec sed -i 's/\.\.\/\.\.\//\.\.\//g' {} +

/../变成了../

或者,您可以要求配置文件存储包含库路径的变量。如果您将以下文件存储为config.js在示例目录中

var config = {};
config.path = '../../';

在你的例子文件中

myConfiguration = require('./config');
express = require(config.path);

您将能够从一个文件控制每个示例的配置。

这只是个人喜好。

我在我的项目中使用process.cwd()。例如:

var Foo = require(process.cwd() + '/common/foo.js');

值得注意的是,这将导致需要一个绝对路径,尽管我还没有在这方面遇到问题。