经过仔细搜索，我找到了实现这一目标的最佳方法。

    private HttpResponseMessage response;

    [SetUp]
    public void Setup()
    {
        var handlerMock = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();

        handlerMock
           .Protected()
           .Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>(
              "SendAsync",
              ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(),
              ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
           // This line will let you to change the response in each test method
           .ReturnsAsync(() => response);

        _httpClient = new HttpClient(handlerMock.Object);

        yourClinet = new YourClient( _httpClient);
    }

正如你所注意到的，我使用了Moq和Moq。保护包。

不要有一个包装器来创建一个新的HttpClient实例。如果您这样做，您将在运行时耗尽套接字(即使您正在处理HttpClient对象)。

如果使用MOQ，正确的做法是添加使用MOQ . protected;到您的测试，然后编写如下代码:

var response = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
    Content = new StringContent("It worked!")
};
var mockHttpMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();
mockHttpMessageHandler
    .Protected()
    .Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>(
        "SendAsync",
        ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(),
        ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
    .ReturnsAsync(() => response);


var httpClient = new HttpClient(mockHttpMessageHandler.Object);

你所需要的只是传递给HttpClient ctor的HttpMessageHandler类的测试版本。主要的一点是，您的测试HttpMessageHandler类将有一个HttpRequestHandler委托，调用者可以设置它，并简单地以他们想要的方式处理HttpRequest。

public class FakeHttpMessageHandler : HttpMessageHandler
    {
        public Func<HttpRequestMessage, CancellationToken, HttpResponseMessage> HttpRequestHandler { get; set; } =
        (r, c) => 
            new HttpResponseMessage
            {
                ReasonPhrase = r.RequestUri.AbsoluteUri,
                StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK
            };


        protected override Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            return Task.FromResult(HttpRequestHandler(request, cancellationToken));
        }
    }

您可以使用该类的实例来创建具体的HttpClient实例。通过HttpRequestHandler委托，你可以完全控制HttpClient发出的http请求。

我做了一些非常简单的事情，因为我在一个依赖注入环境中。

public class HttpHelper : IHttpHelper
{
    private ILogHelper _logHelper;

    public HttpHelper(ILogHelper logHelper)
    {
        _logHelper = logHelper;
    }

    public virtual async Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string uri, Dictionary<string, string> headers = null)
    {
        HttpResponseMessage response;
        using (var client = new HttpClient())
        {
            if (headers != null)
            {
                foreach (var h in headers)
                {
                    client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add(h.Key, h.Value);
                }
            }
            response = await client.GetAsync(uri);
        }

        return response;
    }

    public async Task<T> GetAsync<T>(string uri, Dictionary<string, string> headers = null)
    {
        ...

        rawResponse = await GetAsync(uri, headers);

        ...
    }

}

这个笑话是:

    [TestInitialize]
    public void Initialize()
    {
       ...
        _httpHelper = new Mock<HttpHelper>(_logHelper.Object) { CallBase = true };
       ...
    }

    [TestMethod]
    public async Task SuccessStatusCode_WithAuthHeader()
    {
        ...

        _httpHelper.Setup(m => m.GetAsync(_uri, myHeaders)).Returns(
            Task<HttpResponseMessage>.Factory.StartNew(() =>
            {
                return new HttpResponseMessage(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK)
                {
                    Content = new StringContent(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(_testData))
                };
            })
        );
        var result = await _httpHelper.Object.GetAsync<TestDTO>(...);

        Assert.AreEqual(...);
    }

正如注释中提到的，您需要抽象HttpClient，这样就不会与它耦合。我以前也做过类似的事情。我会试着把我的方法和你们要做的方法相适应。

首先看一下HttpClient类，并决定需要它提供哪些功能。

以下是一种可能性:

public interface IHttpClient {
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> DeleteAsync<T>(string uri) where T : class;
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> DeleteAsync<T>(Uri uri) where T : class;
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> GetAsync<T>(string uri) where T : class;
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> GetAsync<T>(Uri uri) where T : class;
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> PostAsync<T>(string uri, object package);
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> PostAsync<T>(Uri uri, object package);
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> PutAsync<T>(string uri, object package);
    System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> PutAsync<T>(Uri uri, object package);
}

如前所述，这是为了特定目的。我完全抽象出了对HttpClient的依赖，并专注于我想要返回的东西。您应该评估如何抽象HttpClient以只提供您想要的必要功能。

这将允许您只模拟需要测试的内容。

我甚至建议完全放弃IHttpHandler，而使用HttpClient抽象IHttpClient。但我只是没有选择，因为你可以用抽象客户端的成员替换你的处理程序接口的主体。

IHttpClient的实现可以用来包装/改编一个真正的/具体的HttpClient或任何其他对象，它可以用来发出HTTP请求，因为你真正想要的是一个服务，它提供了与HttpClient相反的功能。使用抽象是一种干净(我的观点)和可靠的方法，并且可以使您的代码更易于维护，如果您需要在框架更改时将底层客户端切换为其他东西。

下面是如何实现的代码片段。

/// <summary>
/// HTTP Client adaptor wraps a <see cref="System.Net.Http.HttpClient"/> 
/// that contains a reference to <see cref="ConfigurableMessageHandler"/>
/// </summary>
public sealed class HttpClientAdaptor : IHttpClient {
    HttpClient httpClient;

    public HttpClientAdaptor(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory) {
        httpClient = httpClientFactory.CreateHttpClient(**Custom configurations**);
    }

    //...other code

     /// <summary>
    ///  Send a GET request to the specified Uri as an asynchronous operation.
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">Response type</typeparam>
    /// <param name="uri">The Uri the request is sent to</param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public async System.Threading.Tasks.Task<T> GetAsync<T>(Uri uri) where T : class {
        var result = default(T);
        //Try to get content as T
        try {
            //send request and get the response
            var response = await httpClient.GetAsync(uri).ConfigureAwait(false);
            //if there is content in response to deserialize
            if (response.Content.Headers.ContentLength.GetValueOrDefault() > 0) {
                //get the content
                string responseBodyAsText = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
                //desrialize it
                result = deserializeJsonToObject<T>(responseBodyAsText);
            }
        } catch (Exception ex) {
            Log.Error(ex);
        }
        return result;
    }

    //...other code
}

正如你在上面的例子中所看到的，很多通常与使用HttpClient相关的繁重工作都隐藏在抽象后面。

然后可以用抽象客户端注入连接类

public class Connection
{
    private IHttpClient _httpClient;

    public Connection(IHttpClient httpClient)
    {
        _httpClient = httpClient;
    }
}

然后，您的测试可以模拟SUT所需的内容

private IHttpClient _httpClient;

[TestMethod]
public void TestMockConnection()
{
    SomeModelObject model = new SomeModelObject();
    var httpClientMock = new Mock<IHttpClient>();
    httpClientMock.Setup(c => c.GetAsync<SomeModelObject>(It.IsAny<string>()))
        .Returns(() => Task.FromResult(model));

    _httpClient = httpClientMock.Object;

    var client = new Connection(_httpClient);

    // Assuming doSomething uses the client to make
    // a request for a model of type SomeModelObject
    client.doSomething();  
}

这是一个常见的问题，我非常希望能够模拟HttpClient，但我想我最终意识到不应该模拟HttpClient。这样做似乎是合乎逻辑的，但我认为我们已经被我们在开源库中看到的东西洗脑了。

We often see "Clients" out there that we mock in our code so that we can test in isolation, so we automatically try to apply the same principle to HttpClient. HttpClient actually does a lot; you can think of it as a manager for HttpMessageHandler, so you don't wanna mock that, and that's why it still doesn't have an interface. The part that you're really interested in for unit testing, or designing your services, even, is the HttpMessageHandler since that is what returns the response, and you can mock that.

同样值得指出的是，您可能应该开始把HttpClient当作一个更大的交易来对待。例如:让你的新HttpClients的实例化最小化。重复使用它们，它们被设计成可重复使用的，如果你这样做，会使用更少的资源。如果您开始把它当作一个更大的事情来对待，那么想要模拟它就会感觉更错误，现在消息处理程序将开始成为您正在注入的东西，而不是客户端。

换句话说，围绕处理程序而不是客户端设计依赖项。更好的是，使用HttpClient的抽象“服务”允许你注入一个处理程序，并将其作为你的可注入依赖项。事实上，HttpClientFactor(您应该使用它)被设计为带有注入消息处理程序的扩展。然后在测试中，可以伪造处理程序来控制设置测试的响应。

包装HttpClient是一种疯狂的时间浪费。

更新: 请看约书亚·杜姆斯的例子。这正是我所推荐的。