我有一些问题，试图包装我的代码在单元测试中使用。问题在于。我有接口IHttpHandler:
public interface IHttpHandler
{
HttpClient client { get; }
}
使用它的类HttpHandler:
public class HttpHandler : IHttpHandler
{
public HttpClient client
{
get
{
return new HttpClient();
}
}
}
然后是Connection类，它使用simpleIOC注入客户端实现:
public class Connection
{
private IHttpHandler _httpClient;
public Connection(IHttpHandler httpClient)
{
_httpClient = httpClient;
}
}
然后我有一个单元测试项目，它有这个类:
private IHttpHandler _httpClient;
[TestMethod]
public void TestMockConnection()
{
var client = new Connection(_httpClient);
client.doSomething();
// Here I want to somehow create a mock instance of the http client
// Instead of the real one. How Should I approach this?
}
现在很明显，我将在Connection类中拥有从后端检索数据(JSON)的方法。但是，我想为这个类编写单元测试，显然我不想针对真正的后端编写测试，而是一个模拟的后端。我试着给这个问题一个好的答案，但没有成功。我以前可以用Moq来模拟，但从来没有在HttpClient这样的东西上使用过。我应该如何处理这个问题?
你所需要的只是传递给HttpClient ctor的HttpMessageHandler类的测试版本。主要的一点是，您的测试HttpMessageHandler类将有一个HttpRequestHandler委托，调用者可以设置它，并简单地以他们想要的方式处理HttpRequest。
public class FakeHttpMessageHandler : HttpMessageHandler
{
public Func<HttpRequestMessage, CancellationToken, HttpResponseMessage> HttpRequestHandler { get; set; } =
(r, c) =>
new HttpResponseMessage
{
ReasonPhrase = r.RequestUri.AbsoluteUri,
StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK
};
protected override Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
return Task.FromResult(HttpRequestHandler(request, cancellationToken));
}
}
您可以使用该类的实例来创建具体的HttpClient实例。通过HttpRequestHandler委托，你可以完全控制HttpClient发出的http请求。
这是一个老问题，但我有一种冲动，想用一个我在这里没有看到的解决方案来扩展答案。
您可以伪造Microsoft程序集(System.Net.Http)，然后在测试期间使用ShinsContext。
In VS 2017, right click on the System.Net.Http assembly and choose "Add Fakes Assembly"
Put your code in the unit test method under a ShimsContext.Create() using. This way, you can isolate the code where you are planning to fake the HttpClient.
Depends on your implementation and test, I would suggest to implement all the desired acting where you call a method on the HttpClient and want to fake the returned value. Using ShimHttpClient.AllInstances will fake your implementation in all the instances created during your test. For example, if you want to fake the GetAsync() method, do the following:
[TestMethod]
public void FakeHttpClient()
{
using (ShimsContext.Create())
{
System.Net.Http.Fakes.ShimHttpClient.AllInstances.GetAsyncString = (c, requestUri) =>
{
//Return a service unavailable response
var httpResponseMessage = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.ServiceUnavailable);
var task = Task.FromResult(httpResponseMessage);
return task;
};
//your implementation will use the fake method(s) automatically
var client = new Connection(_httpClient);
client.doSomething();
}
}
这是一个常见的问题，我非常希望能够模拟HttpClient，但我想我最终意识到不应该模拟HttpClient。这样做似乎是合乎逻辑的，但我认为我们已经被我们在开源库中看到的东西洗脑了。
We often see "Clients" out there that we mock in our code so that we can test in isolation, so we automatically try to apply the same principle to HttpClient. HttpClient actually does a lot; you can think of it as a manager for HttpMessageHandler, so you don't wanna mock that, and that's why it still doesn't have an interface. The part that you're really interested in for unit testing, or designing your services, even, is the HttpMessageHandler since that is what returns the response, and you can mock that.
同样值得指出的是，您可能应该开始把HttpClient当作一个更大的交易来对待。例如:让你的新HttpClients的实例化最小化。重复使用它们，它们被设计成可重复使用的，如果你这样做，会使用更少的资源。如果您开始把它当作一个更大的事情来对待，那么想要模拟它就会感觉更错误，现在消息处理程序将开始成为您正在注入的东西，而不是客户端。
换句话说，围绕处理程序而不是客户端设计依赖项。更好的是，使用HttpClient的抽象“服务”允许你注入一个处理程序，并将其作为你的可注入依赖项。事实上，HttpClientFactor(您应该使用它)被设计为带有注入消息处理程序的扩展。然后在测试中，可以伪造处理程序来控制设置测试的响应。
包装HttpClient是一种疯狂的时间浪费。
更新:
请看约书亚·杜姆斯的例子。这正是我所推荐的。
您的接口公开了具体的HttpClient类，因此任何使用该接口的类都被绑定到它，这意味着它不能被模拟。
HttpClient不继承任何接口，所以你必须自己编写。我建议使用类似装饰器的图案:
public interface IHttpHandler
{
HttpResponseMessage Get(string url);
HttpResponseMessage Post(string url, HttpContent content);
Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string url);
Task<HttpResponseMessage> PostAsync(string url, HttpContent content);
}
你的类看起来是这样的:
public class HttpClientHandler : IHttpHandler
{
private HttpClient _client = new HttpClient();
public HttpResponseMessage Get(string url)
{
return GetAsync(url).Result;
}
public HttpResponseMessage Post(string url, HttpContent content)
{
return PostAsync(url, content).Result;
}
public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string url)
{
return await _client.GetAsync(url);
}
public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> PostAsync(string url, HttpContent content)
{
return await _client.PostAsync(url, content);
}
}
所有这些的重点是HttpClientHandler创建了它自己的HttpClient，然后你当然可以创建多个以不同方式实现IHttpHandler的类。
这种方法的主要问题是，你实际上是在编写一个只调用另一个类中的方法的类，然而你可以创建一个从HttpClient继承的类(参见Nkosi的例子，这是一个比我的方法更好的方法)。如果HttpClient有一个可以模拟的接口，事情会简单得多，不幸的是它没有。
This example is not the golden ticket however. IHttpHandler still relies on HttpResponseMessage, which belongs to System.Net.Http namespace, therefore if you do need other implementations other than HttpClient, you will have to perform some kind of mapping to convert their responses into HttpResponseMessage objects. This of course is only a problem if you need to use multiple implementations of IHttpHandler but it doesn't look like you do so it's not the end of the world, but it's something to think about.
无论如何，您可以简单地模拟IHttpHandler，而不必担心具体的HttpClient类，因为它已经被抽象掉了。
我建议测试非异步方法，因为这些方法仍然调用异步方法，但不必担心单元测试异步方法的麻烦，参见这里
